Jieyang Ace Metal And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jieyang Ace Metal And Plastic Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier offering stainless steel vacuum flasks, thermoses, double-wall bottles, and smart temperature-display drinkware products. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but operationally active supplier, with an 800+㎡ factory area, 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its strongest advantages are platform credibility and delivery performance: it has 8 years as an Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and reports a 97.8% on-time delivery rate. Business activity is also strong, with 1,000+ orders and CN¥1.3M+ transaction value in the past six months. However, the company’s factory scale is limited, the store rating of 4.3 is moderate rather than premium, and there is insufficient data on full customization, finished product inspection, or additional product certifications. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ, cost-sensitive stainless steel drinkware sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — Final Score: 12 / 20

Basis

• Factory location: Guangdong, China
• Factory area: 800+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes stainless steel vacuum flasks, thermoses, double-wall bottles, and smart LED temperature-display bottles.

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined factory footprint and workforce, indicating basic in-house operational capacity. An 800+㎡ factory and 30+ employees suggest a small manufacturing or light-production setup rather than a large-scale industrial facility. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification. However, the provided data does not include production line quantity, monthly output, machinery details, warehouse capacity, R&D team size, or independent factory audit documentation beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic manufacturing capability and operational presence, but the scale is relatively limited. Compared with large-scale factories, the available factory area and workforce do not support a conclusion of high-volume industrial production strength. The verified supplier status helps reduce credibility concerns, but the absence of detailed production capacity data limits the score. Therefore, the company fits the category of a small supplier with basic production capability.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — Final Score: 18 / 20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 8 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Platform/industry labels: “On-time delivery 97.8%”, “Response time ≤4h”

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform profile. An 8-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transactional protection for buyers. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform credibility. The supplier also displays operational labels related to delivery and response time, which support its reliability from a platform-performance perspective. However, the provided data does not include third-party management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or complete certification documentation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several core platform credibility indicators: long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These are meaningful signals for procurement risk control, especially for international buyers using as the sourcing channel. The score is not maximized because the data does not show broader certification completeness, such as ISO, product safety certifications, or detailed audit reports. Still, based strictly on the available platform data, credibility is strong.

Final Score

18 / 20

3. Business Performance — Final Score: 17 / 20

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 1,000+
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.3M+
• Store rating: 4.3
• Number of reviews: 500+

Elaboration

The supplier shows substantial recent commercial activity. More than 1,000 orders and over CN¥1.3M in transaction value during the past six months indicate active market demand and transaction execution. The 500+ reviews provide a relatively broad customer feedback base, which improves commercial validation. However, the store rating of 4.3 is moderate and below what would typically be considered a top-tier supplier rating.

Scoring Rationale

The high order volume and transaction value support a strong business performance assessment. The supplier appears to have proven sales activity and a meaningful number of buyers or completed transactions. However, the 4.3 store rating prevents a top-band score because it suggests customer satisfaction is acceptable but not outstanding. The overall commercial performance is strong, but quality consistency, service experience, or expectation alignment may require further review before large-scale procurement.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability — Final Score: 6 / 10

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤4h
• Platform label: “Response time ≤4h”
• Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within four hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for online sourcing. This is suitable for general quotation requests, product inquiries, and order coordination. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, packaging customization, design development, or engineering support.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal response capability, but the lack of customization information limits the service capability score. Since the scoring criteria place value on both response speed and customization ability, the absence of Full Customization data creates a clear limitation. The supplier may be suitable for standard product procurement, but buyers requiring customized bottles, branding, packaging, or product development should verify these capabilities directly before placing orders.

Final Score

6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — Final Score: 10 / 10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 97.8%

Elaboration

A 97.8% on-time delivery rate is a strong operational indicator. It exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band and suggests that the supplier has reliable order fulfillment performance on the platform. For buyers managing replenishment cycles, marketplace inventory, or promotional sales schedules, this delivery performance is a meaningful advantage.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is well above 90%, which qualifies it for the highest delivery performance range. Based on the provided data, delivery reliability is one of the supplier’s strongest measurable capabilities. No negative delivery data was provided.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — Final Score: 15 / 20

Basis

• Store rating: 4.3
• Reviews: 500+
• Verified supplier: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification: Supplier verification indicated as True
• Product certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a meaningful customer feedback base, with 500+ reviews, which provides useful market validation. The 4.3 store rating indicates generally acceptable customer satisfaction, though it is not high enough to be considered excellent. Verified supplier status adds a degree of quality and credibility support, but the data does not confirm whether the supplier conducts Finished Product Inspection or holds specific product compliance certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a mid-to-good score due to its review volume and verified status. However, the 4.3 rating suggests some room for improvement in customer satisfaction or consistency. In addition, the lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and product certification data prevents a higher quality assurance score. Buyers should request inspection procedures, sample evaluation, and applicable compliance documents before bulk procurement.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional Cooperation Recommended

Jieyang Ace Metal And Plastic Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking low-MOQ, cost-sensitive sourcing of stainless steel thermoses, vacuum flasks, and smart temperature-display bottles through with Trade Assurance protection. The supplier is especially suitable for small to medium-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, cross-border sellers, and buyers requiring flexible trial orders rather than immediate large-scale industrial procurement.

Suitable Customer Types:
- E-commerce and cross-border sellers
- Buyers testing stainless steel drinkware products with small MOQs
- Importers seeking platform-protected transactions
- Price-sensitive buyers requiring standard models

Main Risk Points:
- Factory scale is limited: 800+㎡ and 30+ staff
- Store rating is moderate at 4.3
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Product compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Growth Potential:
The supplier shows strong commercial activity, long platform history, and excellent on-time delivery performance. If it can provide clearer quality inspection procedures, customization capabilities, and product compliance documentation, it could become a stronger sourcing option for larger or more quality-sensitive buyers.