Zhejiang Geya Electrical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Zhejiang Geya Electrical Co., Ltd. is a China-based electrical products supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 5,500+㎡ and 180+ staff. The company’s listed product data focuses on GEYA timer relay and digital timing-related electrical products, with low minimum order quantities ranging from 10 to 20 pieces, which may suit buyers requiring flexible trial orders or small-to-medium procurement batches. Its supplier profile shows strong platform credibility, including 14 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and platform tags showing response time within 3 hours and 93.8% on-time delivery. Business performance is also solid, with 200+ orders and CN¥3.5M+ transaction value in the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating from 40+ reviews. However, the provided data does not include explicit information on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, or detailed factory certification names, so these areas should be verified before larger or quality-critical procurement.
Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 5,500+㎡
- Employees: 180+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Specific factory certification names: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a moderate physical production base, supported by a factory area exceeding 5,500 square meters and a workforce of more than 180 employees. This indicates more than a small workshop-scale operation and suggests the company has a defined manufacturing or operational structure. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of the company’s reported operational presence.
However, the provided data does not specify detailed factory audit results, production lines, monthly capacity, equipment list, or recognized factory certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable manufacturing foundation, its production depth and scalability cannot be fully validated from the available data alone.
Scoring Rationale
A factory size of 5,500+㎡ and 180+ staff places the supplier in the medium-sized factory category rather than a large-scale industrial supply chain. The verified supplier status supports basic credibility, but the absence of detailed factory certification or capacity data limits the score from reaching the highest band.
Final Score: 16/20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 93.8%”
- Detailed compliance certificates: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform presence, supported by 14 years of Gold Supplier membership. This long platform history indicates continuity and a relatively mature online trade profile. Trade Assurance availability adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status provides an additional layer of platform-backed credibility.
The listed platform tags are operational rather than certification-based, showing response speed and delivery performance. However, the dataset does not provide specific compliance certificates, product certifications, or industry-standard certifications. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, but compliance documentation completeness cannot be fully confirmed.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 14-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represents a complete and long-standing platform credibility structure. The lack of specific certification names prevents a perfect score, but the available platform indicators are strong and reliable.
Final Score: 19/20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past six months: 200+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥3.5M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 40+
Elaboration
The supplier shows clear commercial activity on the platform, with more than 200 orders and over CN¥3.5 million in transaction value during the past six months. These figures indicate active buyer engagement and a meaningful level of recent sales validation. The store rating of 4.8 is positive and suggests generally favorable buyer satisfaction.
The review count of 40+ provides some customer feedback support, though it is not extremely large relative to the order volume. This means the business performance is strong, but not fully supported by a very large public review base.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s 200+ recent orders and CN¥3.5M+ transaction value demonstrate solid business momentum. A 4.8 rating further supports buyer confidence. However, the review volume is moderate rather than extensive, so the score remains slightly below the highest possible level.
Final Score: 18/20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤3h”
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time within 3 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement. This is not in the strongest service band of ≤1 hour, but it still reflects a reasonably responsive sales or service team.
The dataset does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, technical customization, or engineering support. Therefore, service capability can only be assessed based on response speed, while customization capability remains unverified.
Scoring Rationale
A ≤3h response time reflects normal-to-good service responsiveness, but it does not meet the highest benchmark of ≤1h. Since Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data, the supplier should be scored in the mid-range rather than the top service category.
Final Score: 7/10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 93.8%
Elaboration
The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 93.8%, which exceeds the 90% threshold defined for the highest scoring band. This suggests that the supplier has generally reliable delivery execution on recorded platform transactions.
However, the data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics methods, delayed shipment cases, or performance by destination market. Therefore, the delivery assessment is strong but limited to the single available on-time delivery metric.
Scoring Rationale
With an on-time delivery rate above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the 9–10 point range. A score of 9 is appropriate because the rate is strong, but additional delivery details are not available to justify a full score.
Final Score: 9/10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 40+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True
- Detailed quality certifications: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s 4.8 store rating indicates positive customer satisfaction, and 40+ reviews provide a moderate level of buyer feedback. Verified supplier status adds some confidence in the supplier’s legitimacy and operational presence.
However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, defect rates, quality control workflow, or specific quality certifications. As a result, while customer feedback is favorable, the quality assurance system cannot be fully evaluated from the available information.
Scoring Rationale
The high store rating supports a positive quality perception, but the review count is moderate and the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection limits the quality assurance score. Factory verification helps, but it does not fully replace documented inspection or certification data.
Final Score: 15/20
Total Score
84/100
- Company Strength: 16/20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19/20
- Business Performance: 18/20
- Service Capability: 7/10
- Delivery Performance: 9/10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 15/20
Procurement Recommendation
Zhejiang Geya Electrical Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers seeking timer relays and related electrical timing products with flexible MOQs, active platform transaction history, and strong credibility. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium batch procurement, trial orders, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and verified supplier status.
Key risks include Insufficient Data on Full Customization capability, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory certifications, production capacity, and specific compliance certificates. For larger-volume or quality-critical purchasing, buyers should request product certificates, inspection reports, factory audit documentation, and sample validation before confirming bulk orders.
Overall, the supplier shows strong platform maturity, stable recent business performance, and reliable delivery indicators. Its growth potential is positive if it can provide clearer quality control documentation and confirmed customization capabilities.
Leave your comment