zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Taiyuan Xinderuida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Taiyuan Xinderuida Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shanxi, with a reported factory area of 4,100+ sqm and 10+ staff. The company appears to operate as a small-scale but platform-verified supplier, offering aluminum gutter-related products and one listed metal feeder product, with MOQs ranging from 100 to 1,000 pieces. Its profile shows Gold Supplier status for 1 year, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and platform labels including low MOQ for customization, warranty availability, and finished product inspection. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 90+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating from 10 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 98.2% on-time dispatch rate. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking verified small-to-mid volume sourcing, especially where platform protection, acceptable responsiveness, and reliable shipment timing are more important than large-scale factory capacity.

Taiyuan Xinderuida Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shanxi, China
- Factory area: 4,100+ sqm
- Employees: 10+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory footprint of over 4,100 sqm, which indicates a basic manufacturing or operational facility rather than a purely trading profile. However, the employee count of 10+ staff suggests a relatively small workforce. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding company existence and platform-level verification, but the available data does not indicate large-scale production lines, annual output, equipment details, or major factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates foundational production capability through its factory area and verified supplier status. However, the limited staff size prevents it from being assessed as a large or highly scaled supplier. The profile is stronger than an information-poor supplier but does not reach the level of a medium or large stable factory due to insufficient evidence of production scale, workforce depth, or advanced factory certification.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, Finished product inspection

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These elements reduce procurement risk compared with an unverified supplier. The available platform labels also indicate some commercial and quality-related assurances, particularly finished product inspection and warranty availability. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the evidence of long-term platform credibility.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has the core credibility framework in place: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a moderate-to-good compliance profile. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier duration, which means the supplier has not yet demonstrated a long platform track record. Certification data is also limited to platform labels rather than detailed third-party certificates.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 90+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 10

Elaboration
The supplier has measurable recent commercial activity, with more than 90 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value during the past six months. This suggests that the supplier is active on the platform and has completed transactions with buyers. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is only 10, which limits the depth of customer feedback available for performance validation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable but not high-volume business performance. The order count is meaningful for a smaller supplier, and the transaction amount indicates real sales activity. However, the commercial scale remains moderate, and the limited number of reviews makes the rating less statistically robust. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of stable medium-level transaction performance rather than high-volume, highly validated performance.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard procurement inquiries. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests that the supplier may support some customization at lower order thresholds. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, engineering support, design assistance, sample development process, or dedicated project management capability.

Scoring Rationale
The service capability is reasonable but not exceptional. A response time of ≤4h is acceptable, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The customization evidence is positive but limited because only low MOQ customization is stated, while Full Customization is not confirmed. As a result, the supplier receives a mid-level service score.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 98.2%

Elaboration
The supplier’s stated on-time dispatch rate of 98.2% is strong and exceeds the 90% benchmark for high delivery reliability. This indicates that, based on available platform data, the supplier has been able to meet dispatch commitments consistently.

Scoring Rationale
With an on-time dispatch rate above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance band. The score reflects strong shipment execution according to the provided data. No additional logistics data, such as average lead time or international shipping performance, is available, but the dispatch metric itself is clearly positive.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 10
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, and the presence of a finished product inspection label indicates that some level of quality checking is available before shipment. Supplier verification also adds confidence to the company’s operational legitimacy. However, the number of reviews is limited to 10, so customer feedback volume is not large enough to fully validate consistent quality performance across many orders or buyer types.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has good quality indicators, especially the 5.0 rating and finished product inspection label. However, the small review base limits the reliability of the rating as a broad quality benchmark. There is also insufficient data on formal quality certifications, defect rates, inspection standards, or third-party audit results. The score therefore reflects good but not fully proven quality assurance.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

75 / 100

  • Company Strength: 12 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
  • Business Performance: 15 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order sizes and appropriate pre-shipment verification. Taiyuan Xinderuida Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking aluminum gutter-related products with moderate MOQs, platform-backed transaction protection, and strong on-time dispatch performance. The supplier may be appropriate for small to medium importers, e-commerce sellers, trial orders, and buyers who value Trade Assurance and finished product inspection.

Key risks include limited company scale, only 10+ reported staff, a short 1-year Gold Supplier history, and a relatively small review base of 10 reviews. Full Customization capability is also not confirmed, so buyers with complex technical or design requirements should verify customization scope before placing orders.

Growth potential exists if the supplier continues increasing transaction volume, review count, and platform history while providing more evidence of production capacity, quality systems, and customization capability.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Skycut Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Skycut Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topjet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topjet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lumina Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lumina Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nextshapes Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nextshapes Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topfast Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topfast Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengyi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hengyi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ancreu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ancreu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Urovo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Urovo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengko Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengko Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Levinko Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Levinko Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Winstars Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Winstars Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Fullcolor Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Fullcolor Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Fortune Technology Group Supplier Evaluation
Kus Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Kus Technology Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengye Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhengye Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Gz Leangle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gz Leangle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Hanwei Foods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Hanwei Foods Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Sanyuan Electric Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ninghai Sanyuan Electric Tools Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Invitop Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ziziguo Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Ziziguo Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Baibo Eyeglasses Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Baibo Eyeglasses Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huoxi Silicone Rubber Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huoxi Silicone Rubber Technology Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanning Fangda Printing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Nateen Intelligence Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Nateen Intelligence Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Suoer Electronic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Suoer Electronic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baotou City Guixin Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baotou City Guixin Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Chengtai Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Chengtai Environmental Protection Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Flt Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Flt Chain Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yinglian Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Yinglian Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Telon Audio And Visual Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huizhou Telon Audio And Visual Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Aquacubic Sanitaryware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Aquacubic Sanitaryware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Haoquwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Haoquwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prestressed Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Prestressed Building Materials Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026