zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yiwu Kamu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yiwu Kamu Garment Co., Ltd. is a China-based garment supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 1,600+ sqm and 90+ staff. The company appears positioned as a small-to-mid-sized apparel manufacturer focused on women’s shirts, blouses, Oxford shirts, plaid shirts, satin fabric items, and OEM/customized garment products. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 13 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and certification/industry tags including Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, and Finished product inspection.

Commercial performance is solid, with 100+ orders and CN¥2M+ transaction value over the past six months, although the review base is still limited at 10+ reviews. Service responsiveness is acceptable at ≤4 hours, but there is insufficient data to confirm Full Customization capability beyond the customization-related tags and product descriptions. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small-to-medium buyers seeking women’s shirt products, low-MOQ customization, and platform-backed transaction protection.

Yiwu Kamu Garment Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,600+ sqm
- Staff size: 90+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Product scope includes women’s shirts, blouses, Oxford shirts, plaid shirts, satin fabric, and OEM/customized garment items

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base with over 1,600 sqm of factory space and more than 90 employees. This indicates a functioning manufacturing operation with basic production scale rather than a purely trading-oriented profile. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operating foundation. However, the available data does not include production lines, monthly capacity, machinery details, export volume, or factory management certifications, which limits the ability to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates stable small-to-mid-sized manufacturing capability. Its staff size and factory area are sufficient for regular apparel production and small-to-medium order fulfillment, especially given the listed MOQs of 100–200 pieces. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its basic operational legitimacy. However, the factory size is not large, and there is insufficient data on production capacity or internationally recognized factory certifications, so it should not be scored in the top range for large-scale supply chain strength.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, Finished product inspection

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance availability provides buyers with transaction protection through the platform. Verified supplier status and the presence of platform tags such as Finished product inspection and Warranty available improve its compliance credibility. The data does not provide details on third-party certifications such as ISO, BSCI, OEKO-TEX, WRAP, or social compliance audits, so compliance depth beyond platform-level verification remains insufficient.

Scoring Rationale
A 13-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and relevant platform tags create a credible platform-backed supplier profile. These indicators suggest a relatively mature operating history and a lower platform transaction risk compared with newer or unverified suppliers. The score is not full because the provided data does not confirm broader factory certifications, social compliance audits, or internationally recognized quality management systems.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥2M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 10+

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 100 orders and over CN¥2M in transaction value within the past six months, showing active commercial performance on the platform. The 4.8 store rating is positive and indicates generally favorable customer satisfaction. However, the review count of 10+ is relatively limited compared with the transaction volume, which reduces the depth of publicly visible buyer feedback.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable and meaningful transaction activity, especially for an apparel supplier with relatively low MOQs. CN¥2M+ in six-month transaction value and 100+ orders indicate that the company has recent commercial validation. The 4.8 rating supports a positive performance view, but the limited number of reviews prevents a top-tier score because the public feedback base is not broad enough to fully validate consistency across many buyers.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Customization-related data: Low MOQ for customization tag; product names include Custom, Customize, and OEM
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤4 hours is acceptable for online B2B sourcing but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. The presence of a Low MOQ for customization tag and product descriptions referencing OEM and customization suggest some level of customization service. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability, design support, sampling speed, technical development support, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier appears capable of handling basic customization inquiries and low-MOQ customized garment orders. Its response time is reasonable but not outstanding. Because Full Customization is not clearly confirmed and the available service data is limited, the score should remain in the normal-to-good range rather than the top range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 97.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 97.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. For apparel procurement, where order timing can be sensitive due to seasonal sales cycles and inventory planning, a delivery rate above 90% is favorable. No additional data is provided on average lead time, urgent order capacity, logistics methods, or delay handling procedures.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. A 97.0% rate indicates strong fulfillment discipline and supports confidence in delivery reliability. The score is high, though not necessarily perfect, because the dataset does not include lead time details, historical delay cases, or logistics performance beyond the platform delivery metric.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 10+
- Finished product inspection: Present in certification / industry tags
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Warranty available: Present in certification / industry tags

Elaboration
The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.8, which indicates favorable buyer feedback. The Finished product inspection tag suggests that quality checks are available before shipment, and the verified supplier status adds another layer of credibility. Warranty availability also supports post-sale confidence. However, the review count is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of customer feedback. There is also insufficient data on defect rates, inspection standards, quality control team size, lab testing, fabric compliance, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several useful quality indicators, including a high rating, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These factors support a positive quality assessment. However, the limited review base prevents the supplier from being classified as having extensive customer-validated quality performance. The absence of detailed quality system data also keeps the score below the highest range.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

81 / 100

  • Company Strength: 15 / 20
  • Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
  • Business Performance: 16 / 20
  • Service Capability: 7 / 10
  • Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
  • Quality & Customer Feedback: 16 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Yiwu Kamu Garment Co., Ltd. is suitable for small-to-medium buyers seeking women’s shirts, blouses, Oxford shirts, plaid shirts, satin fabric-related garments, and OEM/customized apparel products with relatively low MOQ requirements. The supplier is especially suitable for buyers who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, verified supplier status, and finished product inspection.

Key risks include limited review volume, insufficient data on full customization capability, insufficient details on production capacity, and lack of disclosed international factory or quality certifications. Buyers should request samples, confirm fabric specifications, clarify customization scope, verify production lead times, and define inspection standards before placing bulk orders.

The supplier shows good growth potential due to its long operating history, stable recent transaction performance, strong on-time delivery rate, and platform-backed quality indicators. Its best-fit customer profile is a buyer seeking reliable low-to-medium volume garment sourcing rather than a buyer requiring large-scale certified production or complex compliance-heavy supply programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Zhengpai Garment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Gathertop Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yiti Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Yiti Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Beauledo Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Warhorse Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Warhorse Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Ai Xue Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Jincong Garment Accessories Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shunri Garment Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yucheng Tianrun Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Binyang Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meiqiai Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Qianzi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Feitong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jindijia Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Nidu Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Longze Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Fanxi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanyang Fanxi Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sanmian Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiahao Marketing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Jiahao Marketing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Huzhou Lucky Bridge Polishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huzhou Lucky Bridge Polishing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanshui Rongying Kitchen-Bath Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Sanshui Rongying Kitchen-Bath Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jingcheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jingcheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yaxing Plastic Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yongjia Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yongjia Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Tuoxin Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Renqiu Tuoxin Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xiongqi Seal Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Xiongqi Seal Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou City Luqiao Zhengguan Hats Factory Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou City Luqiao Zhengguan Hats Factory Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Baecheng Jingjie Clothing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanjing Baecheng Jingjie Clothing Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jugaosheng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jugaosheng Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayi Voice Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Huayi Voice Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Florescence New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Florescence New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Sanjianke Gas Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Sanjianke Gas Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Domisi Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Domisi Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tianwen Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Tianwen Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huamo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huamo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Maxpower Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongkang Maxpower Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jialaibao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jialaibao Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shengyifan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shengyifan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yitai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yitai Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026