Cangnan Yongbo Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Supplier Evaluation Report: Cangnan Yongbo Textile Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary
Cangnan Yongbo Textile Co., Ltd. is a Zhejiang, China-based textile supplier focused on nonwoven needle-punched felt products, including mattress felt pads, recycled polyester needle punch felt, furniture-related nonwoven felt, and bed felt pads. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a factory area of over 1,700 m² and more than 30 staff, indicating a small-to-medium production setup with basic manufacturing capability. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 13 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Commercial performance appears moderate, with over 20 orders and CN¥1.7M+ transaction value in the past six months, though customer feedback volume is very limited with only one review. Delivery performance is strong at 92.9% on-time shipment. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking cost-oriented nonwoven felt products with verified platform backing, but larger buyers should conduct additional quality and capacity checks before scaling orders.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 1,700+ m²
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes mattress felt pads, nonwoven needle punch felt, recycled polyester needle punch felt, furniture nonwoven felt, and bed felt pads.
Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated factory size and workforce, which provides a basic view of its production foundation. A 1,700+ m² facility with 30+ employees suggests the company has an operating manufacturing base, but it does not indicate a large-scale industrial production setup. The product information shows a consistent focus on nonwoven and felt-related textile materials, which implies specialization within a defined product category rather than a highly diversified manufacturing portfolio.
The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s existence and operating profile. However, the provided data does not include detailed production capacity, machinery list, annual output, export volume, or specific factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indication.
Scoring Rationale
Cangnan Yongbo Textile Co., Ltd. demonstrates basic-to-moderate manufacturing strength. The factory area and employee count are sufficient for small-to-medium production, and the company appears to have a focused product line in nonwoven felt materials. However, the scale is not large enough to classify it as a large stable supply chain, and there is insufficient data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, or formal factory certifications. Therefore, the score should reflect a small but operationally capable supplier rather than a large-scale manufacturer.
Final Score
12 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform tags: “Response time ≤2h”, “On-time delivery 92.9%”
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a strong platform history, with 13 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a meaningful indicator of long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support further improves buyer protection, especially for transaction security, payment protection, and order-related dispute handling through the platform.
The supplier also carries operational tags related to response time and delivery performance. However, the provided certification/tag information does not include detailed third-party management system certifications, product certifications, social compliance audits, or industry-specific compliance certificates. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, while broader compliance documentation remains insufficient based on the available data.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well in platform credibility due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. A 13-year platform history is a strong credibility factor and indicates stable presence on . However, the available certification labels are limited to response and delivery metrics, and there is no evidence of broader factory certifications or product compliance documentation. As a result, the supplier qualifies as highly credible from a platform perspective, but not fully comprehensive from a compliance documentation perspective.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.7M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 1
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded more than 20 orders over the past six months, with transaction value exceeding CN¥1.7M. This indicates that the supplier has recent commercial activity and has completed measurable transactions through the platform. The transaction amount is relatively meaningful, especially when considered alongside the listed product pricing and kilogram-based MOQ structure.
The store rating is 5.0, which is positive. However, the reliability of this rating is limited because it is based on only one review. A single review does not provide enough customer feedback depth to fully validate long-term buyer satisfaction, product consistency, or after-sales performance.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows moderate business performance. The six-month transaction value of CN¥1.7M+ is a positive indicator, and 20+ orders demonstrate active sales. However, order volume is not high enough to classify the supplier as a high-volume performer, and the extremely limited review count weakens the commercial validation of the 5.0 rating. The business data supports a stable but not yet strongly proven performance profile.
Final Score
15 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤2h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency. This is useful for procurement teams that require timely quotation, order clarification, and production coordination. The platform tag supports the response-time claim.
However, the provided service capability data does not confirm whether the supplier formally supports Full Customization. Although one product title includes the word “Customized,” this is not sufficient evidence to confirm a full customization service capability under the required evaluation standard. There is also no data on sample support, design support, packaging customization, dedicated account service, or multilingual communication capacity.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates normal service responsiveness, but not premium service capability. A response time of ≤2h is good, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. Since Full Customization capability is not clearly confirmed in the supplied data, the score should not assume advanced customization strength. The supplier is suitable for standard inquiries and routine order communication, but service depth remains partially unverified.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 92.9%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 92.9% is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. According to the provided scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 score range. This suggests that the supplier generally performs well in shipment scheduling and order fulfillment timing.
However, the data does not provide the number of shipments behind this percentage, the average lead time, peak-season delivery performance, or any record of delayed order handling. Therefore, while the on-time delivery metric is positive, deeper delivery risk assessment would require additional order-level logistics data.
Scoring Rationale
A 92.9% on-time delivery rate places the supplier in the high-performance delivery category. The figure is clearly above the 90% threshold, supporting a strong score. Because there is no additional evidence on delivery volume, logistics consistency, or lead-time stability, the score is strong but not perfect.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 1
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive at face value. However, the rating is based on only one review, making the feedback sample too small to strongly validate consistent product quality, customer satisfaction, or after-sales reliability. For procurement decisions, a larger number of reviews would be needed to form a more reliable quality-performance conclusion.
The verified supplier status provides some level of credibility, but the data does not include specific quality control procedures, Finished Product Inspection records, defect rates, inspection reports, product testing standards, or third-party quality certifications. Therefore, the supplier’s quality assurance system cannot be fully confirmed from the available information.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a positive rating and verified supplier status, but customer feedback volume is insufficient. The lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality control documentation limits confidence in product consistency. As a result, the quality profile should be considered partially validated but not strongly proven. The score reflects a supplier with basic quality indicators but limited customer feedback and insufficient documented inspection systems.
Final Score
12 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 12 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 18 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 15 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 9 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 12 / 20 |
| Total Score | 73 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended
Cangnan Yongbo Textile Co., Ltd. is recommended for buyers seeking nonwoven felt products from a supplier with long-term platform presence, Trade Assurance support, and good recent delivery performance. The supplier appears suitable for small-to-medium procurement projects, cost-sensitive buyers, and purchasers requiring mattress felt pads, needle-punched nonwoven felt, recycled polyester felt, or furniture-related felt materials.
However, the supplier should be approached with controlled order scaling. The main risks are limited factory scale, insufficient quality system disclosure, only one customer review, and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory certification data. For larger-volume or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request samples, technical specifications, inspection standards, production capacity details, and pre-shipment inspection arrangements before mass procurement.
The supplier’s growth potential lies in its long platform history, active recent transaction value, focused product category, and strong on-time delivery rate. With stronger quality documentation and more accumulated customer feedback, its procurement reliability could improve further.
Leave your comment