zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Changchun Golden Seed Agricultural Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Changchun Golden Seed Agricultural Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jilin, offering agricultural and food-related products including cherry tomato seeds, eggplant seeds/products, dried apricot, wildflower seeds, and dried morel mushroom. The supplier shows solid platform credibility with 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a recorded on-time delivery rate of 94.9%. Business activity is relatively active, with 300+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value in the past six months. However, the company’s operational scale is only partially visible: factory area is listed as 2,500+ m², but employee count is not provided. Customer feedback is moderate, with a 4.2 store rating and 80+ reviews. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ agricultural products and verified platform-backed sourcing, but buyers should conduct additional quality checks before larger-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis:
Factory area is listed as 2,500+ m². The supplier is marked as a verified supplier. Employee count is not provided.

Elaboration:
The available factory area suggests the supplier has a physical operating base, but the scale appears limited compared with larger industrial suppliers. The absence of employee count restricts the ability to evaluate labor capacity, production organization, or ability to handle larger and more complex orders. Verified supplier status provides some confidence that the business has passed a platform-level verification process, but it does not fully replace detailed factory capacity data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates basic production and operational presence through its factory area and verification status. However, because employee number and deeper production-scale indicators are missing, it cannot be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The score reflects a small-to-mid-sized supplier with basic verified operating capability but incomplete capacity transparency.

Final Score: 13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis:
Gold Supplier: True. Gold Supplier duration: 9 years. Trade Assurance: True. Verified supplier: True. Certification/industry labels include “On-time delivery 94.9%” and “Response time ≤2h”.

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long platform history, with 9 years as a Gold Supplier, which is a strong indicator of platform continuity. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection for buyers, while verified supplier status improves credibility. The provided labels also show measurable operational performance, especially delivery and response speed. However, no separate third-party product certification or industry-specific compliance certification is listed in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status creates a strong platform-based credibility profile. The lack of specific product or industry certifications prevents a perfect score, but the platform compliance structure is substantially complete and reliable for initial procurement screening.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis:
Past 6-month order volume: 300+. Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥1.2M+. Store rating: 4.2. Review count: 80+.

Elaboration:
The supplier shows meaningful commercial traction on the platform, with more than 300 orders and over CN¥1.2M in transaction value within six months. This indicates active buyer engagement and a proven record of completed transactions. The review count of 80+ provides some market feedback, although it is not extremely large. The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not outstanding, suggesting that buyer satisfaction is generally positive but may not be consistently high.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier’s order volume and transaction value support a stable medium-level business performance assessment. The main limitation is the 4.2 rating, which is below the level typically associated with top-performing suppliers. Therefore, the score reflects active and commercially validated operations, balanced by moderate customer satisfaction indicators.

Final Score: 16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis:
Communication response time: ≤2h. Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data.

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates reasonably efficient communication and an ability to support buyer inquiries without excessive delay. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, or other structured customization services. This limits the assessment of service depth beyond standard inquiry handling.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier performs well in response efficiency, but it does not meet the highest service-capability threshold because response time is not listed as ≤1h and customization capability is not confirmed. The score reflects normal-to-good communication capability with insufficient evidence of advanced customization services.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis:
On-time delivery rate: 94.9%.

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is above 90%, which indicates strong delivery discipline based on the provided platform data. This is especially important for agricultural and food-related products where timing, stock availability, and shipment reliability can directly affect buyer planning.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The 94.9% result demonstrates strong delivery reliability, though it is not a perfect score because the data still leaves a small percentage of delayed shipments.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis:
Store rating: 4.2. Review count: 80+. Verified supplier: True. Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data. Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided.

Elaboration:
The supplier has a moderate customer feedback base, with 80+ reviews and a 4.2 rating. This provides some validation from previous buyers, but the rating is not high enough to indicate consistently excellent satisfaction. Verified supplier status supports basic credibility and some level of business verification. However, no Finished Product Inspection information is provided, and no detailed quality-management certification is listed.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality profile is acceptable but not strong. The supplier has enough reviews to provide buyer feedback visibility, and factory/platform verification adds confidence. However, the 4.2 rating and lack of Finished Product Inspection data limit the quality assurance assessment. The score reflects basic quality credibility with moderate customer feedback and incomplete inspection-system visibility.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

Company Strength: 13 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
Business Performance: 16 / 20
Service Capability: 7 / 10
Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Total Score: 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order size and additional quality verification. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking agricultural seeds, dried agricultural products, and low-MOQ sourcing through Trade Assurance. It may be appropriate for small to medium buyers, trial orders, distributors testing product demand, or buyers prioritizing platform-backed transaction security.

Key risks include incomplete production-capacity visibility due to missing employee data, moderate store rating of 4.2, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and customization capability. For larger or quality-sensitive orders, buyers should request product samples, inspection records, batch consistency information, and written confirmation of specifications before scaling procurement.

Growth potential is supported by 9 years of Gold Supplier history, 300+ recent orders, CN¥1.2M+ recent transaction value, and strong 94.9% on-time delivery performance. Overall, the supplier is commercially active and credible, but not yet strong enough to qualify as a low-risk strategic supplier without further due diligence.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Changchun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Changchun Shoes Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changchun Sleep Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changchun Sleep Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changchun Guangfu Special Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changchun Guangfu Special Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Golden River Trading Co. Supplier Evaluation
Shanxi Golden River Trading Co. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Golden Sail Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Golden Sail Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Golden Security Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Golden Security Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Golden Orange Electronics Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Golden Orange Electronics Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing City Golden Choice Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaoxing City Golden Choice Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Mind Golden Card System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chengdu Mind Golden Card System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Golden-Choice Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Golden-Choice Sewing Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Golden River Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Golden River Industrial Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Golden Future Imp And Exp Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Golden Future Imp And Exp Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Golden Yangtze River Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Golden Yangtze River Water Treatment Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jinhui Agricultural S&T Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jinhui Agricultural S&T Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yantchau Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Yantchau Agricultural Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Deyuanxin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jilin Deyuanxin Agricultural Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Future Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Future Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grete (Guangdong) Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Grete (Guangdong) Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yutuo Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yutuo Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Focus Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Focus Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shandong Chenxuan Robot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Chenxuan Robot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Eyelashion Beauty Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Eyelashion Beauty Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lishui Mingyuan Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinchangsheng Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinchangsheng Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Kangfu Medical Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hanway Garments And Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yibo Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yibo Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nuoxin New Materials (Shandong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenhai Explosion-Proof Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenhai Explosion-Proof Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Chongde Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Chongde Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lu Qing Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Lu Qing Industrial Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Nif (Guangzhou) Agri Support Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nif (Guangzhou) Agri Support Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Heng Ning New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Heng Ning New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shenguang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Shenguang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Luba Traffic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Luba Traffic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidinghong International Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidinghong International Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hugerock Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hugerock Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Shengmo Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Shengmo Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Xuantai Pigment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoji Xuantai Pigment Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Giant Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026