Henan Yutuo Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Henan Yutuo Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based greenhouse supplier located in Henan, offering multiple agricultural greenhouse products, including poly tunnel greenhouses, polycarbonate greenhouses, tomato cultivation greenhouses, photovoltaic glass greenhouses, and solar hydroponic Venlo greenhouses. Based on the provided data, the company has a factory area of 2,100+ m² and 30+ staff, indicating a small-to-medium production scale with basic manufacturing capability. The supplier is marked as a verified supplier and has 5 years of Gold Supplier history, supported by several platform labels such as Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and Warranty available. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business performance data such as six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are absent or zero. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customized greenhouse structures with moderate procurement risk tolerance, but commercial validation and customer feedback are currently insufficient.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Company name: Henan Yutuo Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd.
• Location: Henan, China
• Factory area: 2,100+ m²
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes multiple greenhouse categories.

Elaboration

The supplier has a defined manufacturing base with a factory area above 2,100 m² and more than 30 employees. This suggests the company has an operational production setup rather than being purely a trading entity, especially as it is marked as a verified supplier. The product range covers several greenhouse types, from single poly tunnel greenhouses to higher-value photovoltaic and hydroponic glass greenhouse products, indicating some breadth in agricultural greenhouse solutions.

However, the factory size and workforce remain relatively limited compared with large-scale industrial greenhouse manufacturers. There is no provided data on annual production capacity, machinery, production lines, export volume, or factory audit details beyond the verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate production strength through its physical factory area, employee count, and verified supplier status. The available data supports the view that it has real manufacturing capability, but the scale appears closer to a small or lower-mid-sized factory rather than a large-scale stable supply chain. The absence of detailed production capacity and audit documentation limits the confidence level.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
• Trade Assurance: False
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has 5 years of Gold Supplier history, which provides a meaningful level of platform continuity. The verified supplier status and listed platform labels strengthen its credibility, particularly Finished Product Inspection, Warranty available, ODM service, and Full Customization. These labels suggest the supplier presents itself with both service and quality-related platform features.

However, the supplier does not support Trade Assurance according to the provided data. This is a notable limitation because Trade Assurance is often used by buyers to reduce transaction risk, particularly for cross-border procurement involving customized industrial or agricultural structures.

Scoring Rationale

The company has a credible platform presence due to its 5-year Gold Supplier status and verified supplier tag. Its label completeness is relatively good, especially with inspection and customization-related tags. Nevertheless, the absence of Trade Assurance prevents it from reaching the highest credibility tier, as buyers may have weaker payment and delivery protection compared with suppliers that support full platform-backed transaction safeguards.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
• Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration

The provided business performance data is very limited. There is no available information on recent order quantity, transaction value, or store rating. The number of reviews is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base in the supplied dataset. As a result, the supplier’s actual transaction activity and commercial acceptance on the platform cannot be verified from the provided information.

This creates a significant evaluation gap. Even if the company has platform credibility and product coverage, the absence of order and transaction records makes it difficult to assess whether the supplier has stable demand, repeat buyers, or proven export execution.

Scoring Rationale

Because there is no provided order volume, no transaction amount, no store rating, and zero reviews, the supplier lacks sufficient commercial validation. The score must remain low despite its platform history, as business performance should be supported by measurable transaction activity and customer engagement. The current dataset does not demonstrate active or proven sales performance.

Final Score

6 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 2 hours indicates a relatively responsive communication capability. In addition, the presence of Full Customization and ODM service labels suggests that the supplier can support customized greenhouse requirements rather than only selling standardized products. This is relevant for greenhouse procurement, where buyers often require project-specific dimensions, structure types, covering materials, or functional configurations.

However, the response time is not stated as within 1 hour, which would represent the highest service responsiveness tier. Also, no additional data is provided regarding engineering support, design turnaround time, multilingual sales support, after-sales service team, or project management capability.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows good service capability based on a ≤2h response time and available customization services. The combination of ODM and Full Customization is a positive indicator for project-based buyers. However, because the response time does not meet the ≤1h benchmark and detailed service infrastructure is not provided, the supplier should be rated as good but not top-tier.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The provided delivery data shows a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the scoring standard, any on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest scoring range. This is a strong indicator of delivery reliability within the available dataset.

However, the evaluation should be interpreted with caution because the data does not include the number of orders behind this delivery rate. If the delivery performance is based on a small order sample, the reliability of this metric may be less representative. Since order quantity is not provided, the order base behind the 100.0% figure is Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the highest delivery performance threshold with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Although the lack of order-volume context limits deeper interpretation, the provided delivery metric itself is excellent and supports a high score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Number of reviews: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Available

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-related platform indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, Warranty available, and verified supplier status. These are positive signs that some quality assurance or inspection-related mechanisms are presented on the platform.

However, customer feedback data is weak. The store rating is not provided, and the review count is 0. This means there is no customer-side evidence in the provided dataset to confirm product quality, service satisfaction, complaint handling, or repeat purchasing experience. For greenhouse products, where structural quality, material durability, and installation accuracy can be critical, the absence of customer feedback is a notable risk factor.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns credit for having Finished Product Inspection and warranty-related platform labels, as well as verified supplier status. These provide some quality assurance foundation. However, the lack of store rating and zero reviews prevent a higher score because there is no customer validation to confirm quality consistency or buyer satisfaction. Therefore, the supplier is assessed as having basic quality safeguards but insufficient market-proven feedback.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended, subject to further verification.

Henan Yutuo Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. may be suitable for buyers seeking greenhouse products with customization requirements, especially small-to-medium procurement projects where ODM service, Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, and warranty availability are valued. The supplier’s 5-year Gold Supplier status, verified supplier label, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and ≤2h response time are positive indicators.

However, the main risks are the lack of business performance visibility and customer feedback. The provided data shows no six-month order quantity, no transaction value, no store rating, and 0 reviews. Trade Assurance is also not supported, which may increase transaction risk for overseas buyers.

Before placing a large order, buyers should request additional documentation, including recent transaction references, project case evidence, inspection records, production capacity details, and contract-based quality terms. The supplier shows growth potential in customized greenhouse solutions, but current commercial validation is insufficient for high-risk or large-scale procurement without further due diligence.