Changzhou Feiyang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Changzhou Feiyang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, offering high-frequency transformers, high-power transformers, control transformers, and transformer bobbins based on the provided product listings. The company shows a moderate-to-strong manufacturing foundation, with a reported factory area of 8,900+ ㎡, 280+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, Full Customization, and warranty-related labels.

However, its commercial transaction evidence is still limited, with only 10+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value over the past six months, plus only 2 customer reviews. Service and delivery indicators are strong, including response time within 1 hour and 100% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking customized transformer-related electronic components, especially small to medium procurement programs requiring responsive communication and basic quality safeguards.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company: Changzhou Feiyang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.
• Country/Region: China, Jiangsu
• Factory area: 8,900+ ㎡
• Employees: 280+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope shown in data includes high-frequency transformers, high-power transformers, control transformers, and transformer bobbins.

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a relatively solid physical manufacturing base. A factory area of over 8,900 square meters and a workforce of more than 280 staff indicate that the company is not a small workshop-level operation. The employee count suggests the ability to support production, customization, order handling, and operational coordination at a meaningful scale.

The verified supplier status also strengthens the basic company profile, as it provides some degree of third-party or platform-level validation. However, the data does not provide detailed annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment list, export history, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, while the company appears to have stable production capability, the analysis cannot confirm large-scale global supply chain maturity beyond the provided factory size, staff count, and verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The company fits the category of a medium-sized stable factory. Its 8,900+ ㎡ facility and 280+ staff are strong indicators of operational substance, and verified supplier status adds credibility. However, the available data does not show extensive production scale metrics, capacity utilization, major factory certifications, or detailed audit results. For this reason, it should not be rated as a top-tier large-scale supply chain provider, but it deserves a solid score within the medium-stable range.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Platform/industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished Product Inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance provide a basic level of platform-backed trust and transaction protection. The presence of Finished Product Inspection is particularly relevant for procurement risk control, as it indicates that inspection-related processes are available before shipment.

The company also displays useful commercial capability labels such as ODM service and Full Customization, which are relevant for transformer and electronic component sourcing where product specifications may vary by application. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established suppliers. The data also does not provide internationally recognized management or product certifications, such as ISO or product safety certifications. Therefore, compliance credibility is good but not fully comprehensive based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and several useful platform labels. These factors support a credible procurement profile. However, the relatively short Gold Supplier duration of 2 years and lack of provided formal certification details prevent a higher score. The supplier is credible on the platform but does not yet show long-term platform history or a complete compliance certification profile.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 10+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥6.7K+
• Store rating: 4.5
• Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration

The supplier has some recent transaction activity, with more than 10 orders in the past six months. This indicates that the store is active and has completed platform-based business. However, the transaction value of CN¥6.7K+ is relatively limited, suggesting that visible platform sales volume is still small.

The store rating of 4.5 is acceptable, but the review base is very limited, with only 2 reviews. A small review count reduces the statistical reliability of the rating, because a few reviews may not fully represent long-term product consistency, service quality, or delivery reliability. Based strictly on the provided data, the supplier has commercial activity but limited external buyer validation.

Scoring Rationale

Business performance is the weakest dimension in the current profile. While the supplier has active orders and a positive rating, both transaction amount and review count are low. The 4.5 rating is encouraging, but only 2 reviews are insufficient to confirm stable market performance. This supports a score in the lower-to-mid range rather than a high commercial validation score.

Final Score

11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Response time: ≤1 hour
• Platform labels include:
• Full customization
• ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong service responsiveness, with a reported communication response time of less than or equal to 1 hour. This is an important procurement advantage, especially for customized electronic components where technical clarification, drawing confirmation, specifications, pricing, sample discussions, and lead-time negotiation may require frequent communication.

The Full Customization and ODM service labels further support its ability to handle non-standard buyer requirements. Since several listed products are described as custom or transformer-related components, customization capability is relevant to the supplier’s product positioning. However, the data does not include information on engineering team size, sample lead time, technical documentation process, or after-sales response records, so the assessment is limited to the provided response-time and customization indicators.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, response time within 1 hour combined with Full Customization capability qualifies for the top service range. The supplier meets both key indicators provided in the criteria. Although deeper technical service evidence is not available, the available data is strong enough to justify a high service capability score.

Final Score

10 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. This is a strong delivery performance indicator and suggests that, for recorded platform transactions, the supplier has been able to dispatch orders within committed timelines.

However, the delivery performance should be interpreted together with the business volume data. Since the past six-month order count is only 10+ and transaction value is CN¥6.7K+, the available delivery record is positive but based on a relatively limited commercial sample. The provided data does not include average lead time, production cycle, logistics performance, or performance under larger orders. Therefore, the on-time dispatch score can be high, but buyers should still verify lead-time capability for larger or customized orders.

Scoring Rationale

The scoring rule states that an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% on-time dispatch rate clearly meets the highest band. The only caution is that the business volume is limited, but the delivery metric itself is excellent based on the provided data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.5
• Number of reviews: 2
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed
• Factory Verification / Verified supplier: True based on provided “verified supplier” data

Elaboration

The supplier has several quality-supporting indicators. Finished Product Inspection is available, which is important for controlling outgoing product quality. The warranty-related label also indicates that some form of after-sales or product assurance is available, although the exact warranty terms are not provided. Verified supplier status further supports the basic credibility of the company profile.

Customer feedback is positive but limited. A 4.5 store rating is generally good, but only 2 reviews are available, which is not enough to establish a highly reliable quality track record. The data does not provide defect rates, inspection reports, sample approval records, product certifications, return rates, or long-term customer feedback. Therefore, quality assurance appears to be present at a basic-to-good level, but the customer validation base is still thin.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a moderate quality score because it has Finished Product Inspection, verified supplier status, warranty availability, and a 4.5 rating. However, the very small review count prevents a high score. A supplier with only 2 reviews cannot be considered to have broad customer-proven quality consistency. The score therefore falls in the good but not excellent range.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Changzhou Feiyang Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking transformer-related electronic components, especially high-frequency transformers, high-power transformers, control transformers, and customized transformer bobbins based on the provided product listings. The supplier is particularly suitable for small to medium-volume procurement, sample development, customized specifications, and buyers who value fast response and platform-backed transaction protection.

The main strengths are its 8,900+ ㎡ factory, 280+ staff, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization capability, ≤1 hour response time, and 100% on-time dispatch rate. These indicators suggest good operational responsiveness and basic manufacturing reliability.

The key risks are limited commercial validation and limited customer feedback. The supplier has only 10+ orders and CN¥6.7K+ transaction value in the past six months, with only 2 reviews. This means buyers should avoid immediately placing large-volume orders without additional verification.

Recommended procurement approach: - Start with samples or a pilot order. - Confirm technical specifications, drawings, and inspection standards before production. - Request finished product inspection records before shipment. - Use Trade Assurance for initial transactions. - Gradually scale order volume only after quality and delivery performance are confirmed.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential, particularly in customized transformer-related components, but larger procurement programs should proceed with structured qualification and quality verification.