Dazi (Luoyang) Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

DAZI (LUOYANG) IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, offering plastic raw material products including PP polypropylene copolymer, HDPE resin, virgin PE, and related polymer grades. Based on the provided data, the company shows relatively strong operational scale, with a reported factory area of 49,000+ ㎡, 390+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and visible platform performance tags such as response time ≤3h and 100.0% on-time delivery. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 60+ orders and CN¥20.9M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active transaction performance. However, the review base is limited at only 8 reviews, and there is insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory certifications, or customization capability. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established polymer raw material sourcing with verified platform credibility, while quality-system depth should be further checked before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 49,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 390+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Henan, China

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a sizeable operating base in terms of both physical factory area and workforce. A 49,000+ ㎡ facility and 390+ employees suggest that the company is not a small trading-only operation based on the provided information. The verified supplier status also adds a degree of structural credibility. However, the data does not provide detailed annual production capacity, equipment lists, factory audit reports, or specific manufacturing certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company meets the profile of a large-scale supplier with a substantial facility and workforce. The verified supplier status further supports confidence in its operating base. The score is not placed at the absolute maximum because key production details such as capacity, production lines, audit scope, and factory certification records are not provided.

Final Score: 18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Platform tags: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively mature platform profile, with 6 years of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. These elements provide useful procurement protection and platform-level credibility. The verified supplier status strengthens the reliability of the company profile. However, the provided certification/industry tags are limited to response time and on-time delivery, and no independent product certifications, ISO certifications, or detailed factory audit documents are listed.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has strong core platform credibility: Gold Supplier status, a multi-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The score is slightly below the top range because compliance documentation and certification labels are not fully detailed beyond platform performance indicators.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 60+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥20.9M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration:
The supplier shows meaningful recent business activity, especially with CN¥20.9M+ transaction value over the past six months. The 60+ order count indicates consistent transaction flow, while the 5.0 store rating reflects positive buyer feedback within the available review sample. However, the number of reviews is only 8, which limits the statistical strength of the rating.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction value is strong and the order count is commercially meaningful, supporting a high business performance score. However, the limited review count reduces confidence in the long-term consistency of buyer satisfaction. The supplier appears commercially active, but broader feedback evidence remains insufficient.

Final Score: 17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Platform tag: “Response time ≤3h”
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤3h indicates acceptable communication efficiency and suggests that inquiries are handled within a reasonable business timeframe. However, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization capability, technical consultation services, dedicated account support, or multilingual sales capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier performs adequately in response speed, but it does not meet the highest service benchmark of response time ≤1h. Since customization capability is not provided, the service evaluation must remain moderate rather than high.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided. This suggests reliable shipment execution within the observed platform data. No additional logistics details, lead times, export shipment records, or dispute history are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s provided rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score in this category.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 8
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is limited, making the feedback base relatively narrow. Verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory verification reports, product testing standards, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has good visible customer feedback and verified supplier status, but the low number of reviews and lack of explicit inspection or quality-system data prevent a higher score. The quality profile appears acceptable but not fully validated from the supplied information.

Final Score: 15 / 20

Total Score

85 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled procurement risk management. DAZI (LUOYANG) IMPORT AND EXPORT CO., LTD. is suitable for buyers sourcing PP, HDPE, virgin PE, and related polymer raw materials who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, strong recent transaction value, and reliable delivery performance.

The main risks are limited review volume, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, insufficient detail on factory certification scope, and no provided evidence of Full Customization capability. For large-volume or specification-sensitive procurement, buyers should request product test reports, factory audit documentation, quality inspection procedures, batch consistency records, and clear contractual specifications before placing major orders.

The supplier shows strong growth potential due to its operating scale, 6-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥20.9M+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate.