Dongguan Berry Packs Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Dongguan Berry Packs Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 2,500 m² and more than 50 staff. The company appears to focus on trading card storage and protection products, including PU leather card albums, trading card binders, card sleeves, and customized PU leather card storage items. Based on the provided data, the supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility, with 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Its recent business performance is also strong, with over 700 orders and more than CN¥14.8M in transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking established, platform-verified sourcing partners for card albums and related accessories, especially customers requiring stable transaction history and reliable delivery. Key limitations include insufficient data on finished product inspection systems and explicit full customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
Dongguan Berry Packs Co., Ltd. is located in Guangdong, China. The provided data indicates a factory area of 2,500+ m², 50+ staff, and verified supplier status.

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical manufacturing base of moderate size, supported by a workforce of more than 50 employees. This suggests the company has basic to mid-level production capacity rather than a very large-scale industrial setup. The product range includes multiple trading card storage-related items, such as PU leather albums, card binders, and card sleeves, indicating a focused product category rather than a broad unrelated assortment.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not reach the scale typically associated with a large manufacturing group, but the factory size, employee base, and verified supplier status support a stable small-to-medium production profile. The available data is sufficient to confirm operational presence and basic manufacturing capability, though not enough to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score: 15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 9 years, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier. Certification or platform labels include “Socially responsible,” “Low MOQ for customization,” and “OEM for well-known brands.”

Elaboration:
A 9-year Gold Supplier history provides a relatively strong platform track record. Trade Assurance support improves transaction security for buyers, while supplier verification adds credibility to the company profile. The listed labels also indicate platform-recognized strengths, although the provided data does not include detailed third-party certificates or audit documents beyond the verification and labels.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a mature platform presence, long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and verification status. These elements form a strong credibility foundation. However, because detailed compliance certificates or audit reports are not provided, the score remains slightly below the maximum.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
The supplier recorded 700+ orders and CN¥14.8M+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is 4.9, with 100+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The recent order volume and transaction amount indicate strong marketplace activity. A 4.9 rating combined with more than 100 reviews suggests that the supplier has accumulated meaningful buyer feedback, rather than relying on limited transaction evidence. This level of commercial activity supports the supplier’s credibility as an active and proven seller on the platform.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of high six-month order volume, substantial transaction value, strong store rating, and a meaningful review base supports a high score. The supplier shows strong commercial validation based on the provided platform data.

Final Score: 19 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The stated communication response time is ≤2 hours. The platform label includes “Low MOQ for customization,” but no explicit data confirms full customization capability.

Elaboration:
A response time within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing discussions. The presence of customization-related product listings and a “Low MOQ for customization” label suggests some customization service availability, but the provided data does not confirm full customization, design support, private mold capability, sampling process, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates normal-to-good responsiveness, but it does not meet the highest scoring standard because the response time is not ≤1 hour and full customization capability is not explicitly confirmed. Therefore, the service capability is assessed as solid but not premium based on the available evidence.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The provided on-time shipment rate is 100.0%.

Elaboration:
A 100.0% on-time shipment rate indicates very strong delivery reliability within the available platform data. This is particularly important for buyers managing seasonal inventory, retail replenishment, or marketplace sales timelines.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the provided figure is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for delivery performance.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.9 store rating and 100+ reviews. The supplier is verified, but no Finished Product Inspection information is provided.

Elaboration:
The 4.9 rating and 100+ reviews indicate positive customer feedback and a reasonably meaningful review base. Supplier verification also contributes to quality confidence at the company profile level. However, the data does not state whether the supplier provides Finished Product Inspection, product testing, inspection reports, or formal quality management certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
Customer feedback is strong, and verification status provides some quality assurance. However, the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data limits the ability to confirm a comprehensive quality control system. The score reflects good customer satisfaction with incomplete quality assurance documentation.

Final Score: 16 / 20

Total Score

86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Dongguan Berry Packs Co., Ltd. is recommended for cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing trading card albums, PU leather card binders, card sleeves, and related card storage accessories. The supplier is most suitable for small-to-medium importers, e-commerce sellers, brand owners seeking platform-verified suppliers, and buyers that value proven transaction history, strong delivery performance, and Trade Assurance protection.

The main risks are the limited disclosed factory scale, insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, and lack of explicit confirmation of full customization capability. Before placing large or highly customized orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm inspection procedures, clarify customization scope, and verify packaging, material, and quality standards in writing.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility, strong recent business performance, and excellent delivery data, with further growth potential if it can provide more transparent quality control and customization documentation.