zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Yongairui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Yongairui Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 2,000+ m² and 30+ staff. Based on the available data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium production supplier with verified supplier status, 9 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization. Its recent business activity shows 100+ orders and CN¥811.3K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 20+ reviews.

The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized manufacturing, CNC machining, rapid prototyping, metal fabrication, and related customized production services. However, procurement teams should note the moderate company scale, limited review base, response time of ≤4 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and an on-time dispatch rate of 89.7%, which is close to but below the 90% benchmark for top delivery performance.

Shenzhen Yongairui Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 2,000+ m²
  • Employee count: 30+ staff
  • Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
  • Product scope shown includes metal fabrication, CNC machining, rapid prototyping, silicone mold/resin-related products, and one ink cartridge listing.

Elaboration

The supplier has a declared physical production base of over 2,000 m² and a workforce of more than 30 staff. This indicates the company has a real operational foundation and is not merely a trading storefront based on the provided data. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence in its operational legitimacy.

However, the scale remains moderate rather than large. A 30+ staff size and 2,000+ m² facility suggest the supplier may be appropriate for customized, small-batch, prototyping, and mid-volume manufacturing requirements, but the data does not support classification as a large-scale industrial manufacturer. No detailed production capacity, equipment list, annual output, or specific factory certification such as ISO is provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability supported by a physical factory, staff base, and verification status. Its factory size and headcount are sufficient for customized manufacturing and small-to-medium procurement programs, but they do not indicate a large-scale, highly industrialized supply chain. Because factory verification is present, the score should be above the lower range; however, due to limited scale and insufficient data on production lines, machinery, and capacity, it should not enter the 18–20 range.

Final Score

14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier/factory audit: True
  • Certification/platform labels: Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available, Minor Customization
  • Additional compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile based on the available -related indicators. A 9-year Gold Supplier history indicates long-term platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides transactional protection for buyers. Verified supplier status further improves transparency and reduces counterparty risk compared with unverified suppliers.

The listed platform tags are also relevant for procurement evaluation. Finished Product Inspection supports quality-control confidence, while Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization indicate service flexibility. However, the data does not show formal third-party management system certifications, product-specific certifications, or industry-specific compliance documents. Therefore, the evaluation must be limited to platform credibility rather than broader regulatory compliance.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several important platform credibility requirements: long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verification, and multiple service/inspection tags. These indicators justify a high score. The only limitation is the absence of detailed third-party compliance certifications or documented factory-management certificates in the provided data. As a result, the supplier is credible on the platform level but cannot be rated as fully comprehensive from a compliance-documentation perspective.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥811.3K+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Review count: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with more than 100 orders and over CN¥811.3K in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates real buyer activity and a commercially functioning store. A 4.8 rating is positive and suggests generally satisfactory customer experience.

However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited compared with highly mature, high-volume suppliers that usually have a larger public feedback base. The transaction amount is meaningful but not enough, based solely on the provided data, to classify the supplier as a very high-volume exporter or dominant category supplier. The business performance is therefore solid and commercially validated, but not at the highest benchmark level.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has more than basic market validation, supported by 100+ recent orders and a six-month transaction value exceeding CN¥811.3K. The 4.8 store rating further strengthens confidence. Still, the relatively small number of reviews limits the depth of public customer feedback, and the transaction scale appears more consistent with stable medium-level activity than top-tier high-volume performance. This supports a score in the stable mid-to-upper range.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤4h
  • Full Customization: True
  • ODM service available: True
  • Minor customization: True

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates good customization capability through multiple platform labels, including Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization. This is particularly relevant for buyers requiring tailored parts, customized CNC machining, rapid prototyping, or product development support.

The communication response time is listed as ≤4 hours, which is acceptable for normal supplier communication. However, it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response time within one hour. For customized procurement projects, response speed can materially affect quotation efficiency, engineering clarification, sample development, and order confirmation timelines.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has strong customization-related service indicators, which supports a relatively high service score. Nevertheless, the response time of ≤4 hours places it below the top service tier. The supplier appears suitable for buyers who need customization and can work with standard business-hour communication cycles, but it may not be ideal for projects requiring extremely rapid technical response or urgent RFQ turnaround.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 89.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 89.7%, which is close to the 90% threshold for top delivery performance but still falls within the 80–89% scoring band. This indicates generally reliable delivery behavior, but not yet at the highest level of consistency.

For customized products, especially CNC machining, prototyping, and fabrication services, delivery performance can be affected by engineering confirmation, material availability, processing complexity, and inspection requirements. However, no additional data is provided regarding average lead time, delayed-order causes, or logistics performance, so the assessment must rely strictly on the stated on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

At 89.7%, the supplier is very close to the higher performance band, but the scoring standard places 80–89% in the 7–8 point range. Given that the value is near the upper boundary, the supplier deserves the top end of this range. It demonstrates acceptable delivery reliability but should be monitored closely for time-sensitive procurement programs.

Final Score

8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Review count: 20+
  • Finished Product Inspection: True
  • Verified supplier/factory audit: True
  • Additional quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive quality-related profile based on the available data. A 4.8 store rating suggests generally favorable buyer feedback, and Finished Product Inspection indicates that some form of final inspection process is supported or recognized through the platform label. Verified supplier status also provides an additional layer of confidence regarding supplier legitimacy and operational transparency.

However, the public review base is limited at 20+ reviews. This does not provide the same level of statistical confidence as suppliers with hundreds or thousands of reviews. In addition, no detailed quality-control process, inspection reports, defect-rate data, equipment calibration records, or formal quality management certification is provided. Therefore, the quality assessment is positive but not exhaustive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns a solid score because it combines a strong rating, finished product inspection label, and verified supplier status. These are meaningful indicators for procurement screening. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of detailed quality-system documentation prevent a top-tier score. The supplier appears to have basic-to-good quality assurance capability, but buyers should still conduct sample approval, specification confirmation, and pre-shipment inspection for customized orders.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 14 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 16 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 8 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Yongairui Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking customized manufacturing, low-MOQ procurement, rapid prototyping, CNC machining, metal fabrication, and ODM/minor customization services. Its strongest advantages are long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, finished product inspection label, and active recent transaction performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring customized parts or prototype development
- Small-to-medium procurement programs
- Buyers needing low MOQ flexibility
- Engineering-driven purchasers who can manage technical drawings, samples, and specification confirmation

Main risk points:
- Moderate factory scale with 2,000+ m² and 30+ staff
- On-time dispatch rate of 89.7%, slightly below the 90% top-tier threshold
- Limited public review base of 20+ reviews
- Response time of ≤4h, not within the fastest service tier
- Insufficient Data on formal quality certifications, production capacity, equipment list, and detailed QC procedures

Growth potential:
The supplier shows good platform credibility and customization capability. If it improves delivery consistency above 90%, expands verified customer feedback, and provides more formal quality and production-capacity documentation, it could become a stronger candidate for larger and more repeatable procurement programs.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Fangdun Fireproof Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Fangdun Fireproof Sealing Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hebei Mood Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Mood Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuangyang Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Shuangyang Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Langfang Jindu Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Donglai Air Motive Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Donglai Air Motive Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuetong Fasteners Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Yuetong Fasteners Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangdian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chuangdian Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Credit Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Credit Import And Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taixing Chuanda Plastics Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Taixing Chuanda Plastics Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Storike Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Storike Engineering Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Ranpu Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Ranpu Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weichenyang Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weichenyang Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mufeng Paper Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mufeng Paper Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Huotian Dayou Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Huotian Dayou Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi City Mayee Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi City Mayee Electric Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Shitai Wire Mesh Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Shitai Wire Mesh Produce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Sanjianke Gas Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Sanjianke Gas Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Honghao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Honghao Bio-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Dibo Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yantai Dibo Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Yuanjia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Julu Yuanjia Rubber Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026