Foshan Yilutian Outdoor Furniture Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Foshan yilutian outdoor furniture factory is a Guangdong, China-based outdoor furniture supplier with a reported factory area of 6,300+ m², 30+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its listed product range focuses on modern outdoor furniture, teak sofas, patio furniture, hotel outdoor furniture, courtyard sofas, and waterproof outdoor furniture, with low MOQ of 1 piece across the provided product samples. On -related platform indicators, the supplier has 2 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and carries platform labels including response time ≤2h and on-time delivery of 89.5%. Business data shows 20+ orders and CN¥473.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 5.0 store rating but only 5 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for small to mid-sized buyers, project-based procurement, sample orders, and buyers seeking flexible MOQ outdoor furniture sourcing. Key limitations include limited review volume, short Gold Supplier history, and insufficient data on customization, finished product inspection, and broader quality certifications.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 6,300+ m²
- Employees: 30+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a documented physical production base with a factory size above 6,300 m², which indicates a meaningful operational footprint for outdoor furniture production. The employee count of 30+ suggests a small-to-medium production team rather than a large-scale industrial manufacturer. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the company has undergone at least some level of platform or supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale:
The factory area is relatively solid, but the workforce size remains modest. This suggests the supplier may be capable of handling regular small-to-medium orders, sample orders, and project-based procurement, but the data does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain. Since verified supplier status is provided, the score is above the basic-capability range. However, there is insufficient data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, export volume, or factory management systems, which limits the score.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier history: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / platform labels: Response time ≤2h; On-time delivery 89.5%
- Verified supplier status: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are useful procurement safeguards, especially for overseas buyers who rely on platform-backed transaction protection. The 2-year Gold Supplier duration indicates some platform history, but it is still relatively short compared with long-established suppliers.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the core platform trust elements needed for basic procurement confidence: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier period is only 2 years, and the provided certification labels are limited to operational indicators rather than broader compliance or product certification. There is insufficient data on third-party product certifications, export compliance documents, social audits, or management system certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits the “core certification present but relatively short platform history” category.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 20+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥473.2K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 5

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent commercial activity, with more than 20 orders and over CN¥473.2K in transaction value over the past six months. This shows that the supplier is not inactive and has some market validation through platform transactions. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count of 5 is low, which reduces the statistical reliability of the rating.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction amount is meaningful for a small-to-mid-sized supplier, and the order count indicates stable but not high-volume business performance. The low review count prevents the 5.0 rating from being treated as strong proof of broad customer satisfaction. The supplier demonstrates commercial traction, but not enough data supports a high-order, high-review, high-volume business profile.

Final Score: 14 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Platform label: Response time ≤2h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of ≤2h indicates acceptable communication efficiency for buyer inquiries. This is helpful for quotation requests, sample confirmation, order negotiation, and project coordination. However, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, material customization, or design modification.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time is good, but not within the strongest ≤1h benchmark. Since customization capability is not provided, the service capability cannot be rated as high. The supplier appears responsive enough for ordinary procurement communication, but there is insufficient evidence of advanced service capabilities such as full customization or complex project support.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 89.5%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 89.5% is close to the 90% threshold but remains within the 80–89% scoring band. This suggests generally acceptable delivery performance, though there is still some risk of delayed shipment compared with suppliers consistently above 90%.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 89.5%, the supplier is at the upper end of this range and very close to the next performance tier. Therefore, it deserves the higher score within the 80–89% band, but not a 9 because it does not exceed 90%.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Review count: 5
- Verified supplier / factory-audited supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided; detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s 5.0 store rating is positive, but only 5 reviews are available. This means customer feedback is favorable but limited in sample size. Verified supplier status provides a degree of quality and legitimacy support, but the data does not confirm whether finished product inspection, structured QC processes, product testing, or third-party inspection systems are in place.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a high rating and some verification support, which are favorable quality indicators. However, the low number of reviews limits confidence in consistency across multiple buyers and order types. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data prevents the supplier from being rated as having a complete quality assurance system. The score reflects good but still limited quality validation.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 72 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 14 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
- Business Performance: 14 / 20
- Service Capability: 7 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 8 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 14 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Foshan yilutian outdoor furniture factory is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for small-to-medium procurement volumes, sample orders, outdoor furniture projects, hotel/patio furniture sourcing, and buyers who value low MOQ flexibility. The supplier shows acceptable factory scale, platform credibility, recent transaction activity, good response speed, and near-90% delivery performance.

Main risks include limited review volume, only 2 years of Gold Supplier history, modest employee scale, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, product certifications, production capacity, and detailed QC systems. Buyers should request factory audit documents, product inspection procedures, material specifications, lead time confirmation, packaging details, and pre-shipment inspection options before placing larger orders.

Growth potential is moderate. The supplier has a verified platform presence, active transactions, and a focused outdoor furniture product range, but stronger quality documentation, more customer feedback, and improved on-time delivery above 90% would be needed to support higher-volume or long-term strategic sourcing.