Guangzhou Deyuan Plastic Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Deyuan Plastic Products Co., Ltd. is a China-based acrylic/plastic products supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 3,900+ ㎡ and 40+ staff. The supplier presents a relatively credible platform profile, including 13 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and listed capabilities such as ODM service, finished product inspection, warranty availability, and OEM for well-known brands. Its product range in the provided data covers acrylic money boxes, saving jars, acrylic partitions, and acrylic bedside tables, suggesting a focus on custom acrylic and plastic household/decorative products. Commercial performance shows 10+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, but the absence of store rating data and 0 reviews limits customer-side validation. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium batch acrylic products with platform-backed transaction protection, but quality and service validation should be confirmed through samples and inspection before larger commitments.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 3,900+ ㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical production base of moderate size and a workforce of over 40 employees. A 3,900+ ㎡ factory indicates basic manufacturing capacity, but it does not represent a large-scale industrial operation based on the provided data. The verified supplier status strengthens credibility, as it indicates some level of platform or supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates a real production footprint and verified supplier status, which supports basic supply stability. However, the factory size and employee count suggest a small-to-medium operation rather than a large-scale supply chain. No additional data is provided on production lines, monthly output, machinery, or capacity utilization, so a higher score is not justified.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 13 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long operating history as a 13-year Gold Supplier and supports Trade Assurance, which improves transaction protection for international buyers. The presence of multiple platform labels, including finished product inspection and ODM service, indicates a relatively complete platform credibility profile.

Scoring Rationale:
A 13-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a strong credibility base. The listed certification and service labels are comparatively complete. Since the data does not include third-party factory audit reports, ISO certifications, or detailed compliance documents, the score remains slightly below full marks.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent transaction activity, with more than 10 orders and CN¥338K+ in transaction value over six months. This indicates some commercial activity, but the order volume is not high. The lack of store rating and absence of reviews significantly limit the ability to validate buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction value shows that the supplier is active and has completed measurable business through the platform. However, 10+ orders is relatively limited, and the lack of rating data plus 0 reviews creates a weak customer validation profile. This prevents classification as a strong or highly proven commercial performer.

Final Score: 11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Response time: ≤10h
- ODM service available: Yes
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time of within 10 hours is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within one hour. ODM service availability suggests some ability to support customized product development. However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier appears to have basic customization capability through ODM service, but communication speed is moderate rather than fast. Since Full Customization is not confirmed and response time is not within the strongest service tier, the service capability should be assessed as functional but not exceptional.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided. This suggests strong fulfillment discipline for the recorded orders.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives full marks in this dimension. However, this should still be interpreted together with the relatively limited order volume.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished product inspection: Yes
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration:
The supplier lists finished product inspection, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also provides some credibility support. However, the absence of store rating and 0 reviews means there is no visible customer feedback base in the provided data. This creates uncertainty around actual buyer satisfaction and product consistency.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, especially finished product inspection, but customer feedback is not available. Because ratings and reviews are key evidence for quality validation, the lack of buyer-side data materially limits the score. The supplier should not be treated as fully quality-proven until samples, inspection reports, or buyer references are reviewed.

Final Score: 12 / 20

Total Score

72 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for buyers seeking acrylic/plastic products in small-to-medium order quantities, especially where Trade Assurance and ODM capability are useful. The supplier is suitable for trial orders, sample-based development, acrylic display/decorative products, money boxes, and customized acrylic items based on the provided product data.

Key risks include Insufficient Data on store rating, 0 customer reviews, unconfirmed Full Customization capability, and limited visible order volume. Before placing large orders, buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, verify inspection standards, and use Trade Assurance. Growth potential is moderate, supported by 13 years of Gold Supplier history, verified status, finished product inspection, and 100% reported on-time delivery.