Guangzhou Lipinyou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Lipinyou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, primarily presenting screen-protector-related products such as tempered glass, anti-spy matte soft products, full-glue tempered glass, and high-aluminum tempered glass screen protectors. Based on the provided data, the company operates with a reported factory area of over 3,000㎡ and more than 40 staff, indicating a small-to-medium production setup with basic manufacturing capacity. The supplier has Gold Supplier status for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, and is marked as a verified supplier, which provides a basic level of platform credibility.

Commercial activity is moderate, with 30+ orders and CN¥40.5K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating is 5.0, but the review count is only 2, limiting the reliability of customer feedback. The supplier appears suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ screen protector products, but larger buyers should conduct additional verification before placing high-volume orders.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory area: 3,000+㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration:
The supplier has a reported factory area above 3,000㎡ and more than 40 employees, which suggests a functioning manufacturing operation with basic production infrastructure. The company is not positioned as a large-scale supplier based on the available data, but the factory size and staff count indicate capacity beyond a very small workshop. The verified supplier status also adds some confidence that the company has undergone a form of supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates small-to-medium factory strength. Its factory area and employee count support basic production capability, while the verified supplier status improves credibility. However, the data does not show large-scale production lines, advanced manufacturing capacity, annual output, or detailed factory audit results. Therefore, it does not qualify as a large-scale stable supply chain provider.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry labels: “Response time ≤3h”, “On-time delivery 94.3%”

Elaboration:
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are positive indicators for buyer protection and basic supplier legitimacy. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the ability to evaluate long-term platform reliability. The provided certification or industry labels mainly relate to response time and delivery performance rather than independent product, factory, or quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has several important platform credibility signals, but the short Gold Supplier duration and limited certification label scope prevent a higher score. The platform foundation is acceptable for initial cooperation, but the compliance profile is not yet mature or comprehensive.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥40.5K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded commercial activity, with more than 30 orders and over CN¥40.5K in transaction value during the past six months. This shows that the supplier has active buyers and completed transactions on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base is very small, with only 2 reviews. As a result, the rating cannot be considered highly representative.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows moderate business activity but not high-volume transaction performance. The order count is acceptable, while the transaction amount appears relatively limited. The excellent rating supports customer satisfaction, but the low review count weakens the reliability of the performance signal.

Final Score: 13 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤3h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier provides a response-time indicator of within 3 hours, which suggests acceptable communication efficiency for standard inquiries. This is not as strong as suppliers responding within 1 hour, but it remains within a commercially reasonable range. No data is provided regarding Full Customization, OEM/ODM support, packaging customization, design support, or dedicated account service.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time supports a normal service capability level. However, because customization capability is not provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service flexibility. The score reflects acceptable communication but limited evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score: 6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 94.3%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 94.3%, which is above the 90% threshold. This indicates relatively strong fulfillment reliability based on the provided platform data. For buyers placing repeat orders or low-to-medium volume purchases, this delivery performance is a positive operational indicator.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the rate is clearly above 90% but not close to perfect, the supplier receives a strong but not maximum delivery score.

Final Score: 9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 2
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is positive, but the rating is based on only 2 reviews. This makes the feedback sample too small to confirm consistent product quality across many transactions. The verified supplier status provides some credibility, but no specific Finished Product Inspection information is provided. There is also no detailed data on quality control processes, defect rates, inspection standards, or product certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The quality score is constrained by limited review volume and missing inspection-system data. The 5.0 rating and verified supplier status are favorable, but the lack of Finished Product Inspection information and small customer feedback base prevent a higher quality assessment.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 70 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with caution for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ screen protector products and moderate-volume sourcing. The supplier shows acceptable factory capacity, basic credibility, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and strong reported on-time delivery performance.

The main risks are the short 1-year Gold Supplier history, limited review count, modest transaction value, and insufficient data on Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, and quality control systems. For trial cooperation, buyers should start with sample orders or small batch purchases, confirm product specifications clearly, and use Trade Assurance. The supplier has growth potential if it can increase transaction volume, accumulate more verified reviews, and provide clearer quality inspection and customization documentation.