zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Guangzhou Lkg Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Guangzhou Lkg Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier specializing in screen protector and protective film products, including tempered glass screen protectors, privacy anti-spy tempered glass, camera lens protectors, and soft PET film products. Based on the provided data, the company has a moderate manufacturing scale, with a factory area of over 4,800㎡ and more than 90 staff, supported by verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, with 6 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and a reported 96.7% on-time delivery rate. Commercial performance is also solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥1.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, though the store rating of 4.5 and 70+ reviews indicate good but not top-tier customer validation. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking competitively priced mobile accessory protection products with relatively low MOQs and stable delivery performance, while buyers requiring advanced customization or extensive quality certification should request further documentation.

Guangzhou Lkg Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 4,800+㎡
- Employees: 90+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier shows a moderate physical operating scale, with a factory area exceeding 4,800㎡ and more than 90 staff. This indicates a structured production base rather than a very small trading operation. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of basic supplier validation. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, equipment list, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications beyond verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale
The company is stronger than a small-scale supplier because it has a clearly stated factory area, staff size, and verified supplier status. However, the available scale indicators do not reach the level of a large-scale supply chain, and there is insufficient data on production lines, automation level, or formal factory certifications. Therefore, it fits the upper range of a medium-sized stable factory.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Response time ≤6h, On-time delivery 96.7%

Elaboration
The supplier has a relatively complete credibility profile, including 6 years of Gold Supplier membership and Trade Assurance support. Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability add further compliance-related confidence. The platform tags also provide visibility into service and delivery performance. However, the data does not mention internationally recognized product certifications, management system certifications, or third-party factory audit certificates.

Scoring Rationale
A 6-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance, and Finished Product Inspection together form a solid platform credibility base. The supplier demonstrates more than basic compliance credibility, but the absence of detailed third-party certification data prevents it from reaching the highest score range reserved for suppliers with complete and long-term certification systems.

Final Score
17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 300+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥1.2M+
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 70+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated active commercial performance on the platform, with more than 300 orders and over CN¥1.2M in transaction value within the past six months. This indicates real buyer activity and a reasonable transaction base. The store rating of 4.5 is positive, while 70+ reviews provide some customer feedback visibility, though the review volume is not especially high compared with top-performing suppliers.

Scoring Rationale
The order quantity and transaction value suggest stable mid-level business activity rather than low commercial validation. The 4.5 rating is acceptable and commercially usable, but it is not high enough to support a top-tier performance score. The review count provides meaningful but still limited validation. Overall, the supplier fits a stable medium-scale trading profile.

Final Score
16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Platform tag: Response time ≤6h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time of no more than 6 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. However, there is no provided evidence that the supplier supports Full Customization, design customization, packaging customization, OEM/ODM services, or dedicated project support.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. Since customization capability is not provided in the data, the supplier cannot be scored as having strong service capability. The score reflects adequate responsiveness but limited evidence of advanced service support.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 96.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 96.7%, which is above the 90% benchmark for strong delivery performance. This suggests that the supplier has a reliable delivery record on the platform for completed transactions. No additional data is provided on average lead time, logistics options, urgent order capability, or historical delay reasons.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the rate is significantly above the threshold, the supplier deserves a high delivery score. However, because lead time and logistics flexibility are not provided, the score is kept below perfect.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.5
- Reviews: 70+
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a 4.5 store rating and more than 70 reviews, indicating generally positive but not extensive customer feedback. Finished Product Inspection is listed, which provides a basic quality control signal. Verified supplier status adds credibility, but the data does not confirm Factory Verification specifically, nor does it provide defect rates, inspection standards, product testing reports, or recognized quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a reasonable quality assurance foundation through Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. Customer feedback is positive but moderate in volume, and the rating is good rather than excellent. Because Factory Verification and deeper quality documentation are not confirmed, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic inspection” level rather than the highest quality assurance category.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled qualification steps. Guangzhou Lkg Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers sourcing mobile screen protectors, tempered glass protectors, privacy films, camera lens protectors, and PET film products at competitive price ranges and relatively low MOQs.

The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized importers, online sellers, distributors, and buyers seeking stable platform-backed sourcing with Trade Assurance and strong delivery performance. Main risks include insufficient data on Full Customization capability, lack of confirmed Factory Verification, absence of detailed product certifications, and limited visibility into production capacity or quality testing standards. Growth potential is supported by 6 years of Gold Supplier history, 300+ recent orders, CN¥1.2M+ recent transaction value, and a 96.7% on-time delivery rate. For larger or brand-sensitive procurement, buyers should request factory audit documents, product test reports, customization details, and pre-shipment inspection procedures before scaling orders.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Guangzhou Meishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Meishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bolei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Bolei Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Texua Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Texua Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Likate Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Likate Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Juda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Juda Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lianxian Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lianxian Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Saiboro Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Saiboro Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langston Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Langston Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wesdar Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Wesdar Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qida Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Qida Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Haike Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Haike Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Sunshine Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lipinyou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lipinyou Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Taishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Taishi Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongma Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongma Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Comet Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Eden Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Eden Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mankun Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Mankun Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Zhanming Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Wewin Magnet Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Wewin Magnet Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Leapin Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Leapin Environmental Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Shunyutai International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Shunyutai International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Bmag New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Bmag New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongyang Yihe Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinfeng Fan Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Xinfeng Fan Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hiseer Air Conditioning Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hiseer Air Conditioning Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Chita Chemical Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Liaoning Chita Chemical Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Drake International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Drake International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yakai Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Yakai Integrated Housing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Boegam Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Boegam Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Baike Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangxi Baike Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Baiyilun Intelligent Control System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Baiyilun Intelligent Control System Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Likexin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Likexin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Taishenglan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Taishenglan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Naite Metal Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Naite Metal Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Skyjade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Skyjade Rubber And Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Vatti Glass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Vatti Glass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianyi Stationery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Sanyue Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nantong Sanyue Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026