Hangzhou Qingshe Paper Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Hangzhou Qingshe Paper Co., Ltd. is a China-based paper products supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 4,100+㎡ and 20+ staff. The supplier’s product data indicates a focus on tissue paper, napkins, interfold napkins, toilet paper, and wood pulp paper products, with both small-MOQ items and larger roll-based wholesale offerings. From a platform credibility perspective, the company shows relatively solid backing, including 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and service/quality-related tags such as Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and Warranty available. However, business validation is mixed: the supplier reports CN¥608.5K+ transaction value over the past six months but only 4 orders, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. This makes customer satisfaction difficult to verify. Overall, the supplier may be suitable for buyers prioritizing -backed transaction protection, paper product sourcing, customization options, and delivery reliability, while buyers requiring strong public review evidence should proceed cautiously.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 4,100+㎡
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a disclosed physical production base with a factory area above 4,100㎡, which indicates a real operating facility rather than a purely trading-style profile based on the provided data. The employee count of 20+ staff suggests a small-to-lower-medium-sized operation. The verified supplier status adds some credibility to the company’s operational existence, but the available data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, equipment list, factory audit report content, or recognized factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic manufacturing capacity and a verified supplier profile, but its staff size is relatively limited and the production scale cannot be classified as large based on the provided information. The factory area is meaningful, yet without production capacity figures or detailed audit results, the company should be assessed as a smaller supplier with foundational production capability rather than a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score: 12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available

Elaboration:
The supplier has multiple platform credibility indicators. A 5-year Gold Supplier history shows a moderate platform presence, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further supports basic credibility. The listed tags also indicate that the supplier presents quality inspection, customization, ODM, and warranty-related capabilities on the platform.

Scoring Rationale:
This is one of the supplier’s stronger areas. The combination of Gold Supplier status, 5-year platform history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and several service/quality-related tags forms a relatively complete credibility profile. However, the data does not provide third-party certification names, audit details, or internationally recognized compliance certificates, so the score should not reach the maximum range.

Final Score: 18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 4
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥608.5K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0

Elaboration:
The reported six-month transaction value of CN¥608.5K+ indicates that the supplier has completed some measurable platform-based business. However, the order count is only 4, suggesting that the transaction base is narrow and may rely on a small number of purchases. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews create a significant limitation when assessing buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing confidence, and public market acceptance.

Scoring Rationale:
The transaction amount is a positive indicator, but the low order count and lack of review evidence weaken commercial validation. A supplier with only 4 recent orders cannot be considered highly proven in transaction volume, even if the total value is not negligible. Because store rating data is unavailable and review count is zero, the business performance should be rated as low-to-moderate rather than strong.

Final Score: 11 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤10h
- Full Customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration:
The supplier indicates support for Full Customization and ODM service, which is relevant for buyers needing customized paper products, private-label arrangements, or specification-based sourcing. However, the response time of ≤10 hours is acceptable but not highly responsive compared with suppliers responding within one hour. No additional data is provided regarding dedicated sales support, language capability, sample handling speed, or after-sales service process.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has clear customization-related tags, which supports a reasonable service capability score. However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark, and the available data does not confirm communication efficiency beyond the response-time metric. Therefore, the supplier fits the “normal response with basic customization capability” range.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. Based strictly on the provided data, this suggests that recorded shipments were completed within expected delivery timelines. However, the data does not include the number of shipments behind this metric, which matters because the business order count in the past six months is only 4.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier earns a full score in this dimension. The limited order volume should be considered as a contextual caution, but it does not change the delivery-rate-based score.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier / Factory verification: True
- Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration:
The supplier has several quality-related platform indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, verified supplier status, and Warranty available. These are positive signs for quality control and buyer protection. However, no store rating is provided, and the review count is 0, which means there is no customer feedback base available to verify product consistency, complaint handling, or buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has basic quality assurance indicators, but customer feedback is insufficient. Finished Product Inspection and verification support a moderate quality framework, yet the absence of reviews and rating prevents a stronger score. The quality profile is therefore better than “information insufficient only,” but still below suppliers with high ratings and substantial review volume.

Final Score: 13 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Hangzhou Qingshe Paper Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing tissue paper, napkins, toilet paper, and related paper products who value Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, customization capability, and strong reported delivery performance. It may be appropriate for small-to-medium procurement trials or specification-based sourcing projects.

The main risks are limited public customer feedback, 0 reviews, unavailable store rating, low recent order count, and insufficient data on production capacity, equipment, and formal factory certifications. Its growth potential lies in its 5-year platform presence, verified profile, CN¥608.5K+ recent transaction value, customization tags, and 100.0% on-time delivery rate. A trial order, sample inspection, and confirmation of production capacity are recommended before larger-volume procurement.