Haoda (Ningbo) Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Haoda (ningbo) Import And Export Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, positioned around custom aluminum-related manufacturing, including OEM/ODM aluminum parts, precision aluminum machining, die casting molds, and custom manufacturing products. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate physical production base, with a reported factory area of 14,000+ m² and 80+ staff, and it is marked as a verified supplier. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status for 2 years, Trade Assurance, and service/inspection labels including Finished Product Inspection, ODM service, minor customization, and full customization. However, commercial performance is still limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥54K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. Delivery performance is strong with a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customizable aluminum machining or die casting-related sourcing with smaller trial orders, but buyers should manage quality validation carefully due to limited customer feedback data.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 14,000+ m²
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes custom aluminum machining, die casting molds, and OEM/ODM aluminum-related products
Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area above 14,000 m², which indicates a meaningful physical production footprint rather than a very small workshop-scale operation. The employee count of 80+ staff suggests a small-to-medium manufacturing organization with basic operational capacity. The presence of multiple custom-oriented product listings, including machining and die casting mold-related products, supports the view that the supplier is positioned toward customized industrial parts rather than purely standardized trading goods. The supplier is also marked as verified, which strengthens confidence in the existence of its business and production setup.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a reasonable production base through its reported facility size and workforce. However, the employee count does not indicate a large-scale factory, and the data does not provide detailed production line numbers, equipment lists, monthly capacity, or specific factory audit reports. Therefore, it fits best into the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.
Final Score
16 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: supplier verified
- Certification / industry labels: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Minor customization, Full customization
Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance provide a basic level of platform-backed transaction confidence. The supplier is also marked as verified, which adds credibility to its profile. The listed labels show availability of inspection and customization-related capabilities, including Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization. However, the Gold Supplier period is only 2 years, which is relatively short compared with long-established platform suppliers. No third-party management system certifications, such as ISO certification, are provided in the data.
Scoring Rationale
Core platform credibility elements are present: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and relevant capability labels. The main limitation is the relatively short Gold Supplier history and the absence of broader compliance or factory certification details beyond the listed platform tags. This supports a score in the higher-middle range, but not the full 18–20 band reserved for long-term, fully documented platform credibility.
Final Score
16 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 4
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥54K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded transactions on the platform, but the commercial volume is limited. Four orders in six months indicates low order frequency, and CN¥54K+ transaction value suggests some verified business activity but not a high-volume sales profile. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews create a clear limitation in assessing buyer satisfaction and repeat transaction quality. There is not enough data to confirm whether the low order count reflects a new store, project-based industrial orders, or limited market traction.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has some commercial validation through actual order and transaction data, but the scale is low. More importantly, the lack of store rating and customer reviews weakens the ability to evaluate market acceptance and buyer experience. Since the available business indicators are below the level expected for a strongly validated supplier, the score falls into the lower-to-middle range.
Final Score
11 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Full Customization: available
- Minor Customization: available
- ODM service: available
Elaboration
The supplier shows strong service indicators based on the provided information. A response time of ≤1 hour suggests fast communication and good front-end responsiveness. The availability of Full Customization, Minor Customization, and ODM service is especially relevant for custom aluminum machining and die casting-related sourcing, where technical communication, drawings, sampling, and specification alignment are often important. The data does not provide response rate percentage, language capability, engineering team size, or sample lead time, so the evaluation must remain limited to the listed service indicators.
Scoring Rationale
Because the supplier responds within one hour and supports full customization, it meets the highest service scoring condition provided. The score is strong, though not perfect, because supporting details on technical communication depth, project management process, or after-sales service are not available.
Final Score
9 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s stated on-time shipment rate is 100.0%, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This suggests that recorded platform shipments have been fulfilled on schedule. However, the order base is small, with only 4 orders in the past six months, so the reliability of this metric should be interpreted with caution. A perfect shipment rate based on limited transaction volume is positive but not yet enough to prove consistency under larger or more complex order conditions.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. The supplier’s 100.0% rate supports a top-band score. A small deduction is reasonable because the number of recent orders is low, limiting the statistical strength of the delivery record.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: available
- Factory / supplier verification: True
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, particularly Finished Product Inspection and verified supplier status. These factors show that the supplier presents basic quality control and platform verification signals. However, customer feedback is very limited because there are 0 reviews and no store rating provided. This creates a significant gap in assessing product consistency, complaint history, buyer satisfaction, and real-world quality performance. The available information supports basic quality assurance capability, but not strong market-proven quality reliability.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier should not be rated too low because Finished Product Inspection and verification are present. However, the absence of store rating and customer reviews prevents a high score. Since customer feedback is a major part of this dimension and is currently insufficient, the supplier fits the “basic quality information but limited feedback validation” range.
Final Score
13 / 20
Total Score
74 / 100
- Company Strength: 16 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16 / 20
- Business Performance: 11 / 20
- Service Capability: 9 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is conditionally recommended, especially for buyers seeking custom aluminum machining, die casting mold-related products, or OEM/ODM aluminum components with moderate order sizes or trial-stage sourcing needs. The supplier shows a solid physical base, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, fast response time, full customization capability, and excellent reported on-time delivery performance.
The main risks are limited commercial validation, only 4 orders in the past six months, CN¥54K+ transaction value, no store rating, and 0 customer reviews. These gaps make it difficult to fully assess customer satisfaction and long-term quality consistency. Buyers should start with samples, technical drawing confirmation, clear inspection criteria, and small-batch trial orders before scaling procurement volume.
The supplier’s growth potential is supported by its customization labels, inspection capability, and factory size, but it needs more transaction history, customer reviews, and quality feedback to become a stronger long-term procurement candidate.
Leave your comment