zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of over 2,300㎡ and more than 40 staff. The company appears to operate as a small-to-medium scale manufacturer or supplier focused on coding and marking consumables such as solid ink wheels, dry ink rolls, sealer machine consumables, thermal ink, and solid ink rollers. Its platform credibility is relatively strong, supported by 11 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. Business performance is also solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥2.9M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating from 40+ reviews. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ consumables, repeat purchasing, and moderate customization support. Key limitations include limited disclosed quality-system information and no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection.

Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Henan, China
- Factory area: 2,300+㎡
- Staff size: 40+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The company has a disclosed physical production or operating base with a factory area above 2,300㎡ and more than 40 employees. This indicates basic manufacturing or supply capacity rather than a very large-scale industrial operation. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence that the factory information has some platform-backed validation.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier does not appear to be a large-scale manufacturer based on the provided factory size and staff count, but the available data supports a stable small-to-medium operational structure. The presence of factory verification improves reliability, while the relatively modest workforce and factory area prevent it from reaching the highest score range.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 11 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verification status: Verified supplier
- Certification / platform tags: Warranty available, Low MOQ for customization, Minor customization

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 11 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance availability provides transaction protection, and verified supplier status adds credibility. The listed tags indicate some commercial service support, including warranty availability and limited customization options.

Scoring Rationale
An 11-year Gold Supplier record and Trade Assurance support represent strong platform credibility. The supplier also has verification backing, which supports trustworthiness. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party management system certifications or full certification documentation, so the score remains slightly below the maximum range.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 300+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.9M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 40+

Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent commercial performance, with more than 300 orders and transaction value exceeding CN¥2.9M in the past six months. A 4.8 store rating suggests generally positive buyer satisfaction, while 40+ reviews provide a moderate level of feedback validation.

Scoring Rationale
The order volume and transaction value indicate meaningful market activity rather than an unproven storefront. The rating is strong, but the review count is not exceptionally large, so the commercial validation is solid but not at the very highest level. Overall, the supplier demonstrates stable and credible business performance.

Final Score
17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- Customization-related tags: Low MOQ for customization, Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within four hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for procurement inquiries. The platform tags suggest support for low-MOQ and minor customization, but there is no provided evidence of full customization capability.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates reasonable responsiveness and some customization flexibility. However, because the response time is not within one hour and full customization is not confirmed, the service capability should be rated as moderate rather than excellent.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 87.3%

Elaboration
The supplier’s disclosed on-time delivery rate falls within the 80%–89% range. This suggests generally acceptable delivery performance, though there remains a measurable risk of late shipment.

Scoring Rationale
An 87.3% on-time delivery rate supports a stable but not outstanding delivery profile. It is suitable for normal replenishment purchasing, but buyers with strict delivery schedules may need to confirm lead times and shipment commitments before placing larger orders.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Review count: 40+
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong store rating and a moderate number of reviews, indicating generally positive buyer feedback. Verified supplier status adds some quality-related confidence, but no specific Finished Product Inspection information is provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale
The 4.8 rating supports positive customer satisfaction, and the review count provides some validation, though not a large-scale feedback base. Factory verification improves trust, but the lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection limits confidence in systematic quality control. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance” range.

Final Score
15 / 20

Total Score

79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with moderate confidence, especially for buyers seeking coding and marking consumables, low-MOQ purchasing, repeat replenishment, and minor customization. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, solid recent transaction activity, and acceptable communication and delivery performance.

The main risks are the limited disclosed quality-control information, absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection, and an on-time delivery rate below 90%. For bulk or time-sensitive orders, buyers should confirm production lead time, inspection process, shipment schedule, and after-sales warranty terms before finalizing procurement.

Overall, Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. appears to be a suitable small-to-medium supplier with stable platform history and reasonable growth potential, particularly for consumable products requiring flexible order quantities.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang U Tech Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang U Tech Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Center Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Center Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longfly Tech. (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longfly Tech. (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Astouch Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Astouch Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiexunda Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiexunda Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yicosun Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yicosun Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Vigorous-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Vigorous-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Greenawn Tech.Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Greenawn Tech.Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xinyue Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Suzhou Kd Elevater Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Kd Elevater Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fung Hing Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Fung Hing Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ganzhou Yuanfeng Compound Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ganzhou Yuanfeng Compound Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Weidasi Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Weidasi Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinaozhong Grinding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinaozhong Grinding Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Mushang Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yuzhou Mushang Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sunj Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sunj Electric Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dingsi Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Dingsi Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Bim Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Bim Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Yiluhong Garment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Brightyoung Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen New Brightyoung Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou C&L Auto Accessories Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Feng Cheng Machinery Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feng Cheng Machinery Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qianguang Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qianguang Building Materials Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Joya Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Joya Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tuhe Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tuhe Heavy Industry Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ldll Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ldll Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiashangjia Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Jiashangjia Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jingnuo Environment Science And Technology Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jingnuo Environment Science And Technology Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kashibang Film Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Kashibang Film Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026