zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of 1,000+ m² and 40+ staff. The supplier appears to operate as a small-to-medium scale manufacturer or production-oriented supplier, with verified supplier status and an Gold Supplier history of 8 years. Its listed products are mainly coding machine consumables, dry ink rollers, coding ribbons, and related sealer machine consumables, with low MOQ options starting from 1 box or 1 carton. Business activity is relatively solid, supported by 100+ orders and CN¥2.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating. However, the review base is limited at 10+ reviews, and several quality-system details such as Finished Product Inspection are not provided. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, repeat consumable purchasing, and moderate-volume procurement, but larger buyers should further verify production capacity, quality control processes, and customization capability before scaling orders.

Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Henan, China
  • Factory area: 1,000+ m²
  • Employee count: 40+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory audit or factory certification: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd. has a reported physical production base of 1,000+ m² and 40+ employees. This indicates a supplier with basic manufacturing or operational capacity, but the available scale data does not support classification as a large-scale industrial supplier. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding company existence and platform-level verification, but there is no detailed factory audit report, production line count, annual capacity, machinery list, or formal factory certification information provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates a real operational footprint and a modest employee base, which supports basic production capability. However, the factory size and workforce are relatively limited compared with larger supply-chain manufacturers. Because there is verified supplier status but insufficient evidence of advanced factory certification or large-scale production capacity, the company fits best into the small-to-medium supplier category with stable but not highly scaled production strength.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier history: 8 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Response time ≤2h, On-time delivery 82.9%
  • Formal product or management system certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, especially due to its 8-year Gold Supplier status and support for Trade Assurance. These two elements provide meaningful buyer protection and show a relatively long-standing presence on the platform. The verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. However, the data does not include formal compliance certificates, product certifications, ISO certification, or third-party factory audit details.

Scoring Rationale

An 8-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status together represent a reliable platform-level credibility foundation. The supplier has stronger credibility than a newly listed or unverified supplier. The score is not placed in the highest range because certification completeness is limited, and no formal compliance or quality-system certification data is provided.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 100+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.1M+
  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved 100+ orders and CN¥2.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active commercial performance and a meaningful level of buyer demand. The 4.9 store rating is strong, suggesting positive buyer satisfaction among available reviewers. However, the review count of 10+ is relatively limited, meaning the rating is supported by a small sample size.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows stable recent transaction performance, with both order volume and transaction value at a commercially meaningful level. The high store rating supports positive business validation, but the limited number of reviews prevents the supplier from being rated as a fully proven high-volume performer. Overall, the business performance is stronger than basic but not yet supported by a large review base.

Final Score

16 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a stated response time of ≤2 hours, which indicates reasonably efficient communication. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some customization-friendly service capability, particularly for buyers requiring smaller customized orders. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability, engineering support, design support, packaging customization, or private-label service.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s response speed is good, though not within the strongest ≤1 hour benchmark. The low-MOQ customization label is positive, but without explicit Full Customization data, the customization capability should be treated as basic rather than advanced. This supports a mid-to-good service score.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 82.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 82.9%, placing it within the 80–89% range. This indicates acceptable delivery performance, but there is still a noticeable risk of late shipments compared with suppliers consistently performing above 90%.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the provided delivery benchmark, an 82.9% on-time delivery rate qualifies for the 7–8 point range. The supplier demonstrates generally workable delivery reliability, but the rate is not high enough to be considered excellent.

Final Score

7 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.9
  • Review count: 10+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction indicator. However, the review count is only 10+, limiting the statistical reliability of the feedback. Verified supplier status provides a basic credibility layer, but the available data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed QC processes, inspection reports, defect rates, return rates, or formal quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The high rating supports a favorable quality impression, but the small number of reviews and lack of explicit inspection system data create uncertainty. Since Finished Product Inspection is not confirmed and detailed quality assurance information is insufficient, the supplier should be rated as having promising but not fully validated quality performance.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Henan Able Tech Co., Ltd. is recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for buyers seeking low-MOQ sourcing, coding consumables, dry ink rollers, coding ribbons, and related packaging or marking consumables.

The supplier is most suitable for: - Small and medium buyers requiring flexible MOQ - Buyers placing repeat consumable orders - Importers or distributors testing product demand before scaling - Customers who value Trade Assurance and established platform history

Main risk points: - Limited factory scale data: only 1,000+ m² and 40+ staff are provided - Quality system information is incomplete, especially Finished Product Inspection - Review count is relatively low at 10+ - On-time delivery rate of 82.9% is acceptable but not excellent - Full Customization capability is not confirmed

Growth potential is moderate. The supplier has a stable platform history, active recent transactions, good store rating, and low-MOQ customization positioning. Before larger procurement commitments, buyers should request product samples, QC documentation, production capacity details, delivery terms, and inspection arrangements.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Union Coding Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Liako Tech. Corp. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnrm Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Win Win Tech. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Haorui Tech Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Navihua Auto Tech Limited Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chongrui Tech (Fujian) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Jqmaterial Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Koodle Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang U Tech Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang U Tech Machine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Center Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Center Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longfly Tech. (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Longfly Tech. (Guangdong) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Astouch Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Astouch Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiexunda Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiexunda Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Denorgin Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yicosun Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yicosun Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Vigorous-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changsha Vigorous-Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Greenawn Tech.Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Greenawn Tech.Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Grandview Material Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Grandview Material Limited Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Modun (Zhejiang) Industrial Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Modun (Zhejiang) Industrial Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiutu Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiutu Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Elsky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Elsky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Zhuoyu International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Zhuoyu International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dayan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dayan Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Maxdao Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Maxdao Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Cowan Wire Mesh & Machines Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Anping Cowan Wire Mesh & Machines Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Linxi Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Linxi Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinhua Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinhua Electronic Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhiyiren Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Zhiyiren Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Yeqi Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zibo Yeqi Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Galin Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Galin Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dafuxin Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dafuxin Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Everstar Construction Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Everstar Construction Machinery Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Delang Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cixi Delang Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
The Colors World Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
The Colors World Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yongtongli Elevator (China) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yongtongli Elevator (China) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Topson Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Topson Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026