Huizhou Nocta Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Huizhou Nocta Biotechnology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier offering multiple wet wipe-related products, including hygiene wipes, firearm care wet wipes, portable disposable packaging wipes, feminine dry shampoo wipes, and custom wet wipe products. Based on the provided data, the company has a relatively solid physical operating base, with a factory area of over 20,000㎡, more than 210 staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, finished product inspection, full customization, and warranty availability, although the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year. Commercial performance is still limited, with only 4 orders and CN¥4K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and zero reviews. Delivery performance is a notable weakness, with an on-time shipment rate of 66.7%. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customizable wet wipe products and willing to conduct additional due diligence before scaling orders.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
- Factory area: 20,000+㎡
- Employees: 210+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a meaningful operating scale, supported by a sizeable factory area and a workforce of over 210 employees. This suggests the company has more than basic production capacity and may be positioned to handle customized or volume-based wet wipe orders. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s operational profile.
Scoring Rationale:
The company appears stronger than a small workshop due to its factory size and employee base. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, annual output, equipment information, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, it should be rated as a medium-to-strong supplier rather than a fully proven large-scale supply chain partner.
Final Score: 17 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, Response time ≤2h
Elaboration:
The supplier has several platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. The presence of finished product inspection and warranty availability also strengthens its compliance-related profile. However, the Gold Supplier duration is short at only 1 year.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has core platform protections and several useful credibility labels, but its platform history is still limited. The available data does not show long-term platform track record or additional certification details beyond the listed tags.
Final Score: 15 / 20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 4
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥4K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
Elaboration:
The supplier’s recent transaction data shows limited commercial activity. Four orders and CN¥4K+ transaction value over six months indicate that platform-verified buying activity exists, but the scale is low. The absence of store rating and customer reviews limits visibility into buyer satisfaction.
Scoring Rationale:
Commercial validation is weak because both order count and transaction value are low. Zero reviews and missing store rating further reduce confidence in market acceptance and repeat buyer trust.
Final Score: 8 / 20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
- Response time: ≤2h
- Full customization: True
Elaboration:
The supplier shows a reasonably responsive communication profile, with response time within two hours. Full customization capability is also listed, which is relevant for buyers requiring private label, packaging, or formula-related customization within the wet wipes category.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates good service capability, especially due to customization support. However, the response time is not confirmed as ≤1 hour, so it does not reach the highest service score range.
Final Score: 8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
- On-time shipment rate: 66.7%
Elaboration:
The provided on-time shipment rate is below 70%, which indicates a potential reliability concern in fulfillment. For procurement teams, this may require closer order tracking, clearer lead time confirmation, and conservative planning before placing larger orders.
Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate below 70% should receive below 5 points. Since the reported rate is 66.7%, delivery performance is a significant weakness.
Final Score: 4 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
- Finished product inspection: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Reviews: 0
Elaboration:
The supplier has some quality assurance indicators, including finished product inspection and verified supplier status. However, there is no store rating and no customer review history, which means there is insufficient buyer feedback to evaluate actual product consistency or post-sale satisfaction.
Scoring Rationale:
The presence of finished product inspection supports a basic quality control framework. However, the lack of customer reviews and missing rating data prevent a stronger assessment. Quality assurance exists, but customer-side validation is insufficient.
Final Score: 12 / 20
Total Score
64 / 100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation can be considered cautiously, especially for buyers seeking customizable wet wipe products from a supplier with a sizeable factory base and Trade Assurance support. This supplier is more suitable for small to medium trial orders, private-label testing, or buyers willing to conduct sample evaluation and supplier verification before scaling.
Key risks include low recent transaction volume, zero customer reviews, missing store rating, and weak delivery performance at 66.7% on-time shipment. Growth potential exists due to the factory scale, verified supplier status, finished product inspection, and customization capability, but larger procurement commitments should depend on successful sample testing, confirmed lead times, and improved delivery reliability.
Leave your comment