Jiangmen Yingtao Kitchen & Bathroom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Jiangmen Yingtao Kitchen & Bathroom Co., Ltd. is a China-based kitchen and bathroom supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 11,000+ m² and 100+ staff. The supplier focuses on stainless steel kitchen sink products, including single-bowl deep stainless sinks, multifunctional waterfall sinks, SUS304 rectangular sinks, farmhouse handmade stainless steel sinks, and multifunctional farm-style sink products. Its platform profile shows Gold Supplier status for 4 years, Trade Assurance support, supplier verification, and service/quality-related tags including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and Warranty available. Commercial activity exists, with 10+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value in the past six months, but customer review data is weak, with 0 reviews and no available store rating. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified mid-sized sink manufacturing capacity with flexible MOQ options, while buyers requiring strong customer-feedback validation should proceed with additional due diligence.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 11,000+ m²
- Employees: 100+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Guangdong, China
- Product scope: stainless steel kitchen sink products

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated production footprint and workforce size, indicating an established manufacturing operation rather than a very small trading entity. A factory area above 11,000 m² and more than 100 staff suggest the company has meaningful production capacity for kitchen sink manufacturing. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a more credible factory profile.

Scoring Rationale
The company does not reach the level of a large-scale supply chain based on the available data, as the employee count and factory area indicate a mid-sized operation rather than a very large industrial manufacturer. However, the combination of factory size, staff base, product specialization, and verified supplier status supports a stable production foundation. The score reflects a medium-sized but credible factory with adequate production capability.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, Finished product inspection, Full customization, ODM service available

Elaboration
The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification. The 4-year Gold Supplier duration provides a reasonable platform history, though it is not yet a long-term record. The listed tags also show that the supplier presents basic commercial, customization, and quality-related service capabilities on the platform.

Scoring Rationale
Platform credibility is relatively strong because the supplier combines Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is moderate at 4 years rather than long-established. The available certification and service tags are useful, but no additional third-party management system certification data is provided. Therefore, the supplier fits the “core certifications complete but relatively shorter track record” range.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 10+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 10 orders and a transaction value above CN¥405.6K. This indicates some level of buyer acceptance and transaction conversion on the platform. However, the lack of store rating and the presence of 0 reviews significantly limit the strength of business-performance validation.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value is meaningful for a supplier profile with 10+ recent orders, suggesting that some orders may have carried reasonable value. However, the order count is not high, and there is no customer review base to confirm buyer satisfaction or repeatability of performance. Because store rating data is unavailable and review count is zero, the commercial evidence remains limited despite the reported transaction value.

Final Score
12 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier provides a response time within 4 hours, which is acceptable for regular sourcing communication but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. Full Customization and ODM service availability indicate that the supplier may support project-based buyer requirements rather than only standard product sales.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable but not top-tier. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service improves the service-capability assessment because it suggests flexibility for product adjustments or customized sourcing needs. However, without data on design team size, sampling lead time, engineering support, or communication quality, the score remains in the normal-to-good service range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator provided in the dataset. This suggests that, based on available platform data, the supplier has maintained timely shipment performance.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Since the reported rate is 100.0%, the supplier receives the maximum score for this dimension. However, the dataset does not provide the number of shipments behind this percentage, so the score is based strictly on the available on-time delivery rate.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration
The supplier has several positive quality-control indicators, including Finished Product Inspection, verified supplier status, and warranty availability. These are useful platform-level signals that suggest some quality assurance structure exists. However, customer feedback is very weak because there are no reviews and no available store rating in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier cannot be scored as highly validated on quality because there is no customer review history and no store rating to confirm product consistency or buyer satisfaction. The Finished Product Inspection tag and verification status provide a basic quality assurance foundation, but the absence of customer feedback prevents a stronger score. This dimension is therefore assessed as moderate, with quality-system signals present but market feedback insufficient.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Jiangmen Yingtao Kitchen & Bathroom Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing stainless steel kitchen sinks who value verified factory status, Trade Assurance, customization capability, and flexible MOQ options. The supplier appears suitable for small to medium-sized importers, project buyers, e-commerce sellers, and buyers testing product categories with lower initial order quantities.

The main risks are the lack of customer feedback, 0 reviews, and unavailable store rating, which reduce confidence in confirmed buyer satisfaction and long-term quality consistency. Although the supplier has Finished Product Inspection and a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, buyers should still request samples, confirm inspection standards, clarify warranty terms, and verify production capacity before placing larger orders.

Growth potential is moderate to positive. The supplier has a credible factory base, platform compliance indicators, customization capability, and recorded transaction value, but it needs stronger customer-review accumulation and more transparent quality-performance data to support higher-value procurement decisions.