Jiangyin Sunrise Group For Export & Import Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Jiangyin Sunrise Group For Export & Import Co., Ltd.
Location: Jiangsu, China

Executive Summary

Jiangyin Sunrise Group For Export & Import Co., Ltd. appears to be a China-based supplier operating in artificial leather / PVC leather-related product categories, with listed products including sponge embroidery materials, black leather materials, and stocklot PVC artificial leather. The supplier has a reported factory area of over 1,000㎡ and is marked as a verified supplier, but employee count and detailed production capacity are not provided, limiting assessment of true manufacturing scale. On , the company has 2 years as a Gold Supplier, supports Trade Assurance, and lists customization-related service tags including Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization. Commercial activity is limited, with only 1 order in the past six months and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value, while store rating is unavailable and review count is 0. Delivery data is strong, showing a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. Overall, this supplier may be suitable for cautious trial orders or customized sampling, but larger procurement should require further verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Jiangsu, China
• Factory area: 1,000+㎡
• Employee count: Insufficient Data
• Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
• Product listings indicate supply of artificial leather / PVC leather-related materials.

Elaboration

The supplier reports a factory area of more than 1,000㎡, which suggests the presence of a physical operating site, but the scale is relatively limited compared with larger industrial manufacturers. The absence of employee count prevents a reliable assessment of labor capacity, production organization, or ability to handle large-volume orders. The verified supplier status provides some credibility regarding the company’s existence or platform-level verification, but no detailed factory audit report, production line count, monthly capacity, or equipment data is provided.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates basic production or supply capability through its listed factory area and verified supplier status. However, the available factory size indicates a small to lower-medium operating scale, and the lack of employee data significantly weakens visibility into operational capacity. Because there is no evidence of large-scale production infrastructure, extensive staffing, or detailed factory certification, the supplier should not be rated as a large stable supply chain. It fits better into the category of a smaller supplier with basic production capability and some platform verification.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Warranty available
• Full customization
• ODM service available
• Minor customization

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements provide a basic platform-backed trust framework for buyers. The listed service tags also suggest broader commercial support capability, especially in customization and ODM-related services. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short and does not yet demonstrate long-term platform stability. No third-party management system certifications, product compliance certifications, or detailed audit documentation are provided in the supplied data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has core credibility features in place, including Gold Supplier membership, Trade Assurance, and verification. This supports a reasonable level of platform trust. However, the short Gold Supplier duration limits long-term credibility, and the certification information is mainly service-tag based rather than formal compliance or quality certification evidence. Therefore, the supplier is stronger than a basic unverified seller but does not yet reach the level of a long-established, fully certified platform supplier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in the past 6 months: 1
• Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded transaction activity, with CN¥67.6K+ in transaction value during the past six months. However, the number of orders is very limited at only 1 order, which indicates low transaction frequency. The absence of a store rating and the lack of customer reviews make it difficult to validate buyer satisfaction, repeat purchasing behavior, or broader market acceptance. The business record therefore shows some commercial activity but insufficient transaction depth.

Scoring Rationale

The transaction amount indicates that the supplier has completed at least one meaningful order, but the commercial validation remains weak due to the very low order count and absence of reviews. A supplier with only one recent order cannot be considered commercially proven at scale. Since store rating is unavailable and review count is zero, there is no independent buyer feedback to support performance quality. This places the supplier in the lower business-performance range, though not at the very bottom because some transaction value is present.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Minor customization: Available

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international procurement discussions. The availability of Full Customization, ODM service, and Minor Customization suggests that the supplier can potentially support different customization levels, from simple adjustments to more structured product development. However, the provided data does not include details on engineering support, sample lead time, design capacity, or dedicated project management resources.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates solid service capability based on relatively fast response time and multiple customization-related service tags. However, the response time is not within one hour, so it does not meet the highest service-performance tier. Additionally, customization capability is listed but not supported by detailed examples, case studies, or technical documentation. Therefore, the supplier deserves a strong but not top-tier service score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. This suggests that recorded orders were dispatched on schedule. However, the interpretation should consider that recent order volume is only 1 order in the past six months, so the delivery performance sample size is limited.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for a score of 9 to 10 points. The supplier’s reported 100.0% rate supports a full score for delivery performance. While the limited order count should be noted as a risk factor, the delivery metric itself meets the highest threshold based strictly on the available data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Factory Verification / Verified Supplier: True
• Warranty available: Listed

Elaboration

Quality and customer feedback visibility is limited. The supplier has no available store rating and no customer reviews, which prevents assessment of buyer satisfaction, product consistency, defect rates, or after-sales performance. The verified supplier status provides some platform-level credibility, and the “Warranty available” tag suggests after-sales support may exist. However, no Finished Product Inspection information, formal quality certification, inspection process, or documented quality-control system is provided.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has partial quality assurance signals through verification status and a warranty-related tag, but the absence of customer reviews and store rating creates a major information gap. Without Finished Product Inspection data or formal quality documentation, quality reliability cannot be strongly validated. The score is therefore below the average threshold, reflecting insufficient customer feedback and limited quality-system transparency.

Final Score

9 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation is recommended, preferably starting with sample orders or small trial orders.

This supplier has acceptable platform credibility, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and strong listed customization capability. The 100.0% on-time dispatch rate is positive, and the response time of ≤2h supports efficient early-stage communication. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking artificial leather / PVC leather-related materials, especially those requiring small trial quantities, customization discussion, or ODM-related cooperation.

However, buyers should treat the supplier as commercially under-validated due to only 1 order in the past six months, 0 reviews, and no available store rating. Key risks include insufficient visibility into employee scale, production capacity, customer satisfaction, and quality inspection systems. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request factory audit documents, production capacity details, quality-control procedures, pre-shipment inspection arrangements, and physical samples.

Growth Potential: Moderate. The supplier has a basic platform foundation and customization tags, but stronger transaction history, customer feedback, and quality documentation are needed to support larger procurement confidence.