zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Lianyungang Highborn Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Lianyungang Highborn Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu, with a reported factory area of 2,500+ sqm and 100+ staff. The company shows a relatively stable operational profile supported by verified supplier status, 19 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and customization-related platform labels including Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization. Its listed products cover ceramic, diffuser, sensor probe, laboratory-use, and mosquito repellent wick-related items, indicating a diversified product presentation based on the supplied data. Commercially, the supplier has recorded 100+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a 4.8 store rating and 30+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 97.7% on-time dispatch rate. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified platform credibility, flexible customization support, and stable small-to-medium volume procurement. Key limitations include limited review volume and insufficient data on finished product inspection.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier is based in Jiangsu, China, with a factory area of 2,500+ sqm, 100+ staff, and verified supplier status marked as True.

Elaboration:
The available data indicates a physical production base with more than 100 employees, which suggests a functioning manufacturing organization rather than a purely trading-style storefront. The 2,500+ sqm factory area reflects a moderate facility scale. Verified supplier status provides additional support that the company has undergone some form of platform-related verification, though the exact verification scope is not further detailed in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
The company does not present the scale of a large industrial supplier, but the combination of factory space, staff size, and verified supplier status supports a stable medium-sized manufacturing profile. The available information is sufficient to confirm basic production capability, but there is no additional data on production lines, annual capacity, equipment, or factory audit details. Therefore, it fits best within the medium stable factory range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score: 15/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 19 years, supports Trade Assurance, and has verified supplier status. Platform labels include Full Customization, ODM service available, Response time ≤3h, and Minor Customization.

Elaboration:
A 19-year Gold Supplier history is a strong platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support adds transaction protection from the platform perspective. The verified supplier status further strengthens trustworthiness compared with suppliers lacking verification. The customization and response-time labels also indicate a more complete profile, although no independent third-party certificates or industry-specific compliance documents are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a long-term and complete platform credibility structure, including Gold Supplier longevity, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status. The lack of specific external certifications or detailed factory audit documentation prevents a perfect score, but the platform-side credibility is clearly strong and long-standing.

Final Score: 19/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
In the past six months, the supplier recorded 100+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value. Store rating is 4.8, with 30+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The order count and transaction value show active recent commercial performance. A 4.8 rating indicates generally positive buyer satisfaction based on available platform feedback. However, the review count of 30+ is moderate rather than extensive, so the feedback base is not large enough to fully validate performance at a high-volume level.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has clear commercial activity and a meaningful six-month transaction record. The combination of 100+ orders and CN¥676.1K+ transaction value supports a stable operating profile. However, compared with suppliers showing very high order volumes, larger transaction values, and a broader review base, this performance is better characterized as solid mid-level rather than top-tier.

Final Score: 16/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The supplier’s communication response time is listed as ≤3h. Platform labels include Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization.

Elaboration:
A response time within three hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for sourcing discussions. The presence of Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization suggests the supplier can support varying levels of buyer-specific requirements. However, the response time does not meet the strongest service benchmark of ≤1 hour, and there is no additional data on dedicated account management, technical support, sample lead time, or after-sales process.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows strong customization capability based on the provided platform labels and a reasonable communication response time. Because the response time is ≤3h rather than ≤1h, the score should remain below the highest tier. The data supports a strong but not exceptional service capability rating.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate is 97.7%.

Elaboration:
A 97.7% on-time dispatch rate is a strong delivery performance indicator. It exceeds the 90% threshold required for the highest scoring band. This suggests that, based on the provided data, the supplier has been able to meet platform-recorded dispatch timing requirements consistently.

Scoring Rationale:
Since the on-time dispatch rate is above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the 9–10 point range. Given that 97.7% is close to full reliability and there are no negative delivery indicators provided, a top score is justified within this dimension.

Final Score: 10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.8 store rating, 30+ reviews, and verified supplier status. Finished Product Inspection information is not provided. Factory verification is partially supported by the verified supplier status, but detailed Factory Verification documentation is not specified.

Elaboration:
The 4.8 rating indicates positive customer feedback, while 30+ reviews provide some validation but not a large-scale review base. Verified supplier status contributes to quality confidence at the platform level. However, the provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, specific quality certifications, inspection procedures, defect rates, or detailed factory verification reports.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has favorable ratings and some platform verification support, but the quality assurance system cannot be fully confirmed from the available data. The review count is moderate, and Finished Product Inspection is Insufficient Data. Therefore, the supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance indicators” range, but it should not be rated in the highest quality tier.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 15/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19/20
Business Performance: 16/20
Service Capability: 8/10
Delivery Performance: 10/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 16/20

Total Score: 84/100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommended for cooperation with controlled validation. Lianyungang Highborn Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking a verified supplier with long platform history, Trade Assurance support, customization capability, and strong delivery performance. It is most appropriate for small-to-medium volume procurement, customized product inquiries, and buyers who value platform credibility and responsive communication.

Main risk points include moderate factory scale, limited review volume, and Insufficient Data regarding Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, production capacity, and formal quality certifications. Before placing larger or technically demanding orders, buyers should request samples, confirm inspection standards, clarify production lead times, and verify quality control procedures in writing.

Growth potential is positive based on the supplier’s 19-year Gold Supplier history, 100+ recent orders, CN¥676.1K+ recent transaction value, customization labels, and 97.7% on-time dispatch rate. The supplier appears commercially active and operationally stable, but higher-value procurement should proceed with standard supplier qualification steps.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Lianyungang Tuopu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Tuopu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Gls Quartz Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Gls Quartz Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Baibo New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Baibo New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Haoning Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Haoning Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Baishun Medical Treatment Articles Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lianyungang Baishun Medical Treatment Articles Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Skycut Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Skycut Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topjet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topjet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Alwaycare Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lumina Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lumina Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen F&Q Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nextshapes Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nextshapes Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topfast Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Topfast Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengyi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hengyi Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ancreu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ancreu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Urovo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Urovo Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pherobio Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengko Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hengko Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Sinocoroplast Packing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Shenzhen Lianshi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Lianshi Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Esd Acoustic (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Esd Acoustic (Hangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinan Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bobo Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bobo Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Huizhong Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuxi Huizhong Power Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Suihua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Suihua Fiberglass Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Qiangong International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linyi Qiangong International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yute Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Yute Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Biying Cosmetics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinkailong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinkailong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hiwoss Seaweed Biotechnology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Hiwoss Seaweed Biotechnology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xingbei Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Xingbei Metal Wire Mesh Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Kingzest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Kingzest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Hongmei Home Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Taizhou Hongmei Home Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Rongheyuan Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Eco Bamboo Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Eco Bamboo Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Luqi Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fuzhou Luqi Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Donrex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Donrex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nangong City Baiwangyou Felt Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Nangong City Baiwangyou Felt Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinbao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jinbao New Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026