Luoyang Yantong Electric Power Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Luoyang Yantong Electric Power Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, offering CHINT NXC series electrical control products with low minimum order quantities of 5–12 pieces. Based on the available data, the supplier shows a moderate operational foundation, with a factory area of over 5,200㎡, more than 20 staff, and verified supplier status. Its profile includes 2 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and platform-visible performance indicators such as response time within 4 hours and 86.4% on-time delivery.

Commercial performance appears stable but not high-volume, with 20+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months. The store rating of 4.9 is strong, though the review count is limited at 10. This supplier may be suitable for small to mid-sized buyers seeking low-MOQ procurement of listed CHINT electrical components. However, customization capability, finished product inspection, and broader certification data are not provided, requiring further verification before larger-scale cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Henan, China
- Factory area: 5,200+㎡
- Staff: 20+
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a physical factory footprint above 5,200㎡, which indicates a certain level of operational infrastructure. However, the employee count of 20+ suggests a relatively lean workforce rather than a large-scale manufacturing organization. Verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic legitimacy of the company’s operations.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production capability through its factory area and verified supplier status. However, the limited staff scale prevents it from being classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. The available data supports a middle-range score, reflecting a small-to-medium supplier with established but not extensive production capacity.

Final Score: 14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Platform labels: Response time ≤4h, On-time delivery 86.4%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has core credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance. The 2-year Gold Supplier duration indicates some platform operating history, though it is not long-term. The presence of response and delivery performance labels improves transparency, but no additional industry certifications are provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has the main platform credibility features required for safer online procurement, including Trade Assurance and verification. However, the Gold Supplier history is relatively short, and certification coverage appears limited based on the provided data. This supports a solid but not top-tier compliance credibility score.

Final Score: 15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Past 6-month orders: 20+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥202.8K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Reviews: 10

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded commercial activity over the past six months, with more than 20 orders and transaction value above CN¥202.8K. The 4.9 rating is positive, indicating buyer satisfaction among recorded reviewers. However, the review base is relatively small, limiting the strength of commercial validation.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows real transaction activity and a high rating, but the order volume, transaction value, and review count suggest moderate rather than high market traction. The performance is sufficient for initial procurement consideration, but not enough to support a high-volume commercial confidence rating.

Final Score: 15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s response time within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. However, there is no provided evidence of Full Customization capability, engineering support, private labeling, or tailored product development.

Scoring Rationale:
The response speed is reasonable but does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. Since customization capability is not confirmed, the service capability score should remain moderate. The supplier appears suitable for standard product inquiries, while customized procurement requirements need further confirmation.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 86.4%

Elaboration:
An on-time delivery rate of 86.4% places the supplier within the 80–89% delivery performance range. This suggests generally acceptable delivery reliability, though not at the strongest level expected from highly stable supply chains.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. Since 86.4% is in the upper part of this band, the supplier receives the higher score within this range.

Final Score: 8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.9
- Review count: 10
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed Factory Verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s 4.9 store rating is strong, showing positive buyer feedback from available reviews. However, the review count is only 10, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. No specific finished product inspection process or detailed factory verification report is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale:
The high rating supports a positive quality impression, while the limited review count and lack of confirmed inspection system prevent a higher score. The verified supplier status provides some assurance, but the absence of Finished Product Inspection data means quality control capability cannot be fully validated.

Final Score: 14 / 20

Total Score

73 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended for small to mid-sized buyers seeking listed CHINT NXC electrical components with low MOQ requirements. The supplier shows acceptable platform credibility, moderate business activity, good store rating, and reasonable delivery performance.

Primary risks include limited employee scale, only 2 years of Gold Supplier history, modest review volume, absence of confirmed Full Customization capability, and Insufficient Data on Finished Product Inspection or detailed factory verification scope. Growth potential exists if the supplier can provide stronger quality-control documentation, more transaction history, and clearer customization or inspection capabilities. For first-time cooperation, buyers should start with small trial orders under Trade Assurance before scaling procurement volume.