Shenzhen Data Power Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Data Power Technology Ltd. is a China-based lithium battery supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 8,300+㎡ and 180+ staff. The supplier shows a solid operational foundation, supported by verified supplier status, 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and a strong on-time delivery rate of 98.7%. Its recent business performance is also meaningful, with 100+ orders and CN¥6M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating active commercial traction on the platform. The store rating is 5.0, although the review base is relatively limited at 10+ reviews.

This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking lithium polymer or rechargeable lithium battery products with low MOQ flexibility and reliable delivery performance. However, data is insufficient regarding formal product inspection systems, full customization capability, and detailed factory certifications beyond platform verification. Overall, it is a credible mid-sized supplier with strong platform history and delivery reliability, but buyers should verify quality control documentation before large-scale procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — Final Score: 16/20

Basis

• Company name: Shenzhen Data Power Technology Ltd.
• Country/region: China, Guangdong
• Factory area: 8,300+㎡
• Employees: 180+ staff
• Verified supplier / factory verification status: True
• Main listed products include lithium polymer batteries and rechargeable lithium battery products.

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base with 8,300+㎡ of factory space and 180+ employees. This indicates a moderate manufacturing scale rather than a small trading-only operation. The employee count and factory size suggest the company has basic industrial production capacity and can likely handle repeated commercial orders within its product category.

The verified supplier status further strengthens its company profile, as it provides some platform-level confirmation of business existence and supplier legitimacy. However, the provided data does not include detailed factory audit reports, production line count, monthly production capacity, equipment list, R&D team size, or internationally recognized factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates characteristics of a medium-sized stable factory: measurable factory space, a substantial staff base, and verified supplier status. These factors support a positive assessment of production stability. However, it does not reach the highest score band because the available data does not confirm large-scale production capacity, advanced manufacturing systems, or comprehensive factory certifications. Therefore, the supplier fits the “medium stable factory” range.

Final Score

16/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — Final Score: 19/20

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Supplier verification: True
• Platform tags provided:
• Response time ≤2h
• On-time delivery 98.7%

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile. A 12-year Gold Supplier history is a significant indicator of platform continuity and long-term commercial presence. Trade Assurance availability also provides buyers with an added transaction protection mechanism, which is important for cross-border procurement.

The supplier also has verified supplier status, which adds credibility to its company profile. Platform performance tags, including response time and on-time delivery, further support operational transparency. However, the data does not provide a full list of compliance certifications, industry-specific certifications, or third-party audit certificates beyond the platform-related verification.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in this dimension due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and supplier verification. These are key credibility indicators for procurement risk screening. The only reason it does not receive a full score is that the provided data does not show a complete set of third-party compliance certifications or detailed certification documentation. Still, its platform credibility is clearly strong.

Final Score

19/20

3. Business Performance — Final Score: 17/20

Basis

• Orders in past six months: 100+
• Transaction value in past six months: CN¥6M+
• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 10+

Elaboration

The supplier has achieved 100+ orders over the past six months, which shows active buyer engagement and regular transaction flow. The reported CN¥6M+ transaction value is relatively strong and indicates that the supplier is not only receiving small sample orders but also generating meaningful commercial sales volume.

The store rating of 5.0 is excellent, suggesting positive buyer satisfaction among the available reviews. However, the number of reviews is only 10+, which limits the statistical strength of the rating. A perfect rating based on a smaller review base is positive but should be interpreted with caution.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates strong recent business activity, with both order count and transaction value supporting commercial validation. The 5.0 rating further improves the evaluation. However, the limited review count prevents the supplier from being scored at the very top level, as buyer feedback depth remains relatively narrow. Overall, the supplier shows stable and credible business performance.

Final Score

17/20

4. Service Capability — Final Score: 7/10

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Platform tag: Response time ≤2h
• Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤2 hours indicates reasonably efficient communication. For procurement purposes, this level of responsiveness is acceptable for quotation clarification, sample discussion, and order coordination.

However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm whether the supplier supports “Full Customization” or a structured customization service. Some listed product names include terms such as “Custom” and “OEM,” but the data does not provide a formal customization capability label, engineering support details, design capability, or customization workflow. Therefore, customization capability cannot be fully confirmed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier receives a solid but not high score in service capability. The response time is good but not within the strongest ≤1 hour band. In addition, full customization support is not sufficiently documented. As a result, the supplier appears capable of normal communication and basic service handling, but advanced service capability requires further confirmation.

Final Score

7/10

5. Delivery Performance — Final Score: 10/10

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 98.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate of 98.7% is a strong delivery performance indicator. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring band. For buyers, especially those managing production schedules, replacement cycles, or inventory-sensitive procurement, a high on-time delivery rate is a meaningful advantage.

The data does not include average lead time, shipping methods, or historical delay reasons, but the available on-time delivery metric is clearly strong.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.7%, the supplier is near the upper end of this range. This suggests strong delivery discipline and reliable order fulfillment based on the available platform data.

Final Score

10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — Final Score: 15/20

Basis

• Store rating: 5.0
• Reviews: 10+
• Verified supplier / factory verification: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
• Detailed quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is a positive quality and service signal. The supplier is also marked as verified, which provides some level of platform-backed credibility. These factors support a generally favorable quality perception.

However, the review count is only 10+, meaning the feedback base is not large enough to strongly validate long-term product consistency. Additionally, the provided data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, internal QC procedures, third-party inspection support, battery-specific compliance certifications, or documented quality management certifications. Since lithium battery products often require careful quality and safety control, the absence of detailed quality assurance data is an important limitation.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier scores well due to its 5.0 rating and verified supplier status. However, the limited number of reviews and lack of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or detailed quality certification data prevent a higher score. The supplier appears to have basic quality credibility, but procurement teams should request further documentation before placing high-volume or safety-sensitive orders.

Final Score

15/20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Data Power Technology Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking lithium polymer and rechargeable lithium battery products from a medium-sized China-based supplier with strong platform credibility, long supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and excellent delivery performance. The supplier is especially suitable for sample orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, and buyers who value low MOQ flexibility and reliable dispatch performance.

Suitable customer types:
- Small and medium importers sourcing rechargeable lithium battery products
- Buyers requiring low MOQ trial orders
- Procurement teams prioritizing platform-backed supplier credibility
- Customers needing suppliers with strong on-time delivery performance

Main risks:
- Finished Product Inspection status: Insufficient Data
- Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
- Detailed quality management certifications: Insufficient Data
- Review base is limited at 10+, despite a 5.0 rating

Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong growth potential due to its 12-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥6M+ recent transaction value, 100+ recent orders, and 98.7% on-time delivery rate. If the supplier can provide stronger documentation for quality control, product inspection, and customization capability, it could become a stronger candidate for larger-volume or longer-term procurement cooperation.