Ningbo Shangyang Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Ningbo Shangyang Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, with reported factory scale of 63,000+ m² and 300+ staff. The company appears positioned as a manufacturer of smart lockers, laptop/tablet charging carts, and related device storage or charging solutions, with listed products supporting low MOQs of 10 pieces or units. From a procurement perspective, its strongest advantages are factory scale, verified supplier status, Trade Assurance support, full customization availability, finished product inspection, and a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. However, its commercial track record on the platform is still limited, with only 2 orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value in the past six months, no available store rating, and 0 reviews. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking customized smart storage or charging cart products from a factory-scale supplier, but initial cooperation should be controlled through sample orders, specification confirmation, and Trade Assurance-backed transactions.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Factory area: 63,000+ m²
• Employees: 300+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Country/region: CN, Zhejiang

Elaboration

The supplier reports a relatively large factory footprint and a workforce exceeding 300 staff, which indicates a meaningful production base rather than a small trading operation. The available data also confirms verified supplier status, which provides additional confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform-side or supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale

Based on the provided scale indicators, the company demonstrates characteristics of a large and stable manufacturing supplier. The factory area is substantial, the employee count is strong, and verified supplier status supports basic credibility. However, the data does not provide detailed production capacity, equipment lists, annual output, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications beyond the verified supplier flag, so a perfect score is not justified.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 2 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification/industry labels: Socially responsible, Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization
• Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. The certification and service labels are also relatively complete, covering social responsibility, inspection, ODM capability, and customization.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a qualified supplier. Trade Assurance and verified supplier status reduce transaction risk, while the listed labels improve confidence in service and compliance positioning. The main limitation is the relatively short Gold Supplier history of 2 years, which is positive but not yet long enough to indicate long-term platform maturity.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 2
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥27K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0

Elaboration

The recent platform transaction record is limited. Two orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value over six months suggest that the supplier has some verified commercial activity, but the order volume and transaction scale remain low. The absence of a store rating and the lack of customer reviews weaken the ability to assess buyer satisfaction and repeat purchasing behavior.

Scoring Rationale

Although the supplier has recorded transactions, the commercial validation is not strong enough to support a high business performance score. The low order count, modest transaction value, missing store rating, and 0 reviews create uncertainty about market acceptance and buyer feedback. This does not mean the supplier lacks capability, but the available platform evidence is insufficient to prove strong business performance.

Final Score

8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤7h
• Full customization: Listed
• ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier indicates support for full customization and ODM services, which is relevant for buyers requiring product adaptation or private-label development. The response time of within 7 hours is acceptable for cross-border procurement communication, though it is not within the strongest service tier of one hour or less.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows solid service capability through customization and ODM-related labels. However, the response time is moderate rather than highly responsive. Since no additional data is provided regarding technical consultation, quotation speed, design support, after-sales handling, or sample development cycle, the score should remain in the middle-to-good range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. This suggests that, for recorded transactions, the supplier has met shipment timing commitments.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the reported figure is 100.0%, the supplier deserves the maximum delivery score. However, this should still be interpreted together with the low order volume, because the delivery performance is based on a limited recent transaction base.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Reviews: 0
• Finished product inspection: Listed
• Factory verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has some quality-related safeguards, including a finished product inspection label and verified supplier status. These are positive indicators for procurement risk control. However, the absence of store rating data and the lack of reviews mean there is no direct customer feedback available to validate product quality, consistency, or after-sales performance.

Scoring Rationale

The quality assurance structure appears better than a supplier with no inspection or verification indicators. Finished product inspection and verified supplier status support a baseline level of quality credibility. Nevertheless, quality and customer feedback cannot be rated highly because there are 0 reviews and no store rating data. The lack of buyer-side evidence creates a clear information gap.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

71 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Ningbo Shangyang Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking smart lockers, laptop/tablet charging carts, and related customized products from a factory-scale supplier with Trade Assurance and inspection-related platform labels.

Recommended customer types include: - Buyers needing customized smart storage or charging cart products - Small to mid-sized importers willing to start with controlled trial orders - Procurement teams that can verify specifications, samples, and inspection requirements before bulk purchasing

Main risks: - Low recent transaction volume: 2 orders in six months - Limited commercial validation: CN¥27K+ transaction value - No available store rating - 0 customer reviews

Growth potential is present due to the supplier’s reported factory scale, customization capability, ODM availability, verified supplier status, and 100.0% on-time shipment rate. However, buyers should start with sample evaluation, written specifications, inspection requirements, and Trade Assurance-protected orders before scaling procurement volume.