Qingdao Chengmingde Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Qingdao Chengmingde Industry And Trade Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, with a reported factory area of 5,000+ m² and 20+ staff. The available data indicates a verified supplier status, Gold Supplier membership for 1 year, Trade Assurance support, response time within 1 hour, and 100.0% on-time delivery. Its listed product is the Eayvent MERV8 Kraft Paper Pre Filter, with a low MOQ of 24 pieces and a price range of CN¥11.63–39.83. Commercial performance shows 30+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating but only 5 reviews. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume filter products with fast communication and strong delivery reliability. However, the limited review base, short Gold Supplier history, and lack of disclosed quality inspection certifications or finished product inspection data create some procurement risk for larger or highly quality-sensitive buyers.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 5,000+ m²
- Employees: 20+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a documented factory area above 5,000 m², which indicates a physical production base rather than a purely trading profile based on the provided information. The staff size of 20+ suggests a relatively lean organization. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and basic operational profile of the company, but the available data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, machinery lists, factory audit reports, or management system certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The factory size supports a reasonable production foundation, while the staff count suggests the company is not a large-scale manufacturer. Verified supplier status improves confidence in basic company legitimacy. However, due to the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment, audit scope, or factory certification data, it should be assessed as a small-to-medium supplier with basic operational stability rather than a large-scale supply chain partner.

Final Score
14 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 1 year
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Response time ≤1h; On-time delivery 100.0%
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has core platform credibility elements, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These are useful for reducing transaction risk on the platform. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 1 year, which limits the evidence of long-term platform reliability. The certification or industry tag data mainly reflects operational performance indicators, not formal product certifications or international compliance standards.

Scoring Rationale
The presence of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and supplier verification supports a credible platform profile. However, the short 1-year Gold Supplier duration prevents it from being classified as a long-established platform supplier. In addition, no product compliance certifications, factory audit certificates, or industry-specific quality certifications are provided. Therefore, the supplier has a solid but still developing compliance credibility profile.

Final Score
15 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 30+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥405.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 5

Elaboration
The supplier has achieved a measurable level of recent platform activity, with 30+ orders and CN¥405.6K+ in transaction value over the past six months. This indicates some level of market acceptance and active transactions. The 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review count is only 5, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The data does not provide repeat buyer ratio, buyer countries, dispute rate, refund rate, or order fulfillment breakdown.

Scoring Rationale
The transaction value and order count show that the supplier has real commercial activity, but the order volume is moderate rather than high. The perfect rating is favorable, yet the small review base means the rating should be interpreted cautiously. Since the commercial record is visible but not yet broad enough to demonstrate strong market validation, the supplier fits the category of stable but medium-scale business performance.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤1h
- Platform tag: Response time ≤1h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong response speed, with response time reported as within one hour. This is a positive indicator for inquiry handling, quotation communication, and early-stage procurement coordination. However, no data is provided confirming Full Customization, design support, private labeling, packaging customization, sample development, or engineering assistance.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤1h supports a high service score in terms of communication efficiency. However, because customization capability is not confirmed in the provided data, the supplier cannot receive the highest service rating. The available information supports strong responsiveness but only limited evidence of broader service capability.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
- Platform tag: On-time delivery 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery performance indicator available in the dataset. This suggests reliable fulfillment for the transactions reflected by the platform data. However, the data does not include shipment volume, order complexity, logistics methods, destination markets, or historical delivery consistency beyond the stated platform metric.

Scoring Rationale
Based strictly on the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. The reported 100.0% rate justifies a strong score. A perfect score is not assigned because the dataset does not clarify the sample size, shipment destinations, or delivery performance across different order scales.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 5
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The store rating of 5.0 is positive and indicates favorable customer feedback from the available reviews. However, the review count is only 5, which is too limited to strongly validate consistent product quality across many buyers or repeated transactions. The supplier is marked as verified, which supports basic credibility, but no Finished Product Inspection data, product testing reports, quality control workflow, defect rate, or certification details are provided.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier receives credit for its 5.0 rating and verified status, but the small review base and lack of disclosed inspection or quality assurance documentation limit confidence. The available quality signal is positive but not yet comprehensive. For buyers with strict quality requirements, further verification of inspection procedures, samples, and product specifications would be necessary before scaling orders.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

74 / 100

Score breakdown:
- Company Strength: 14 / 20
- Platform & Compliance Credibility: 15 / 20
- Business Performance: 15 / 20
- Service Capability: 8 / 10
- Delivery Performance: 9 / 10
- Quality & Customer Feedback: 13 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scale and proper pre-shipment verification.

This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume procurement of MERV8 kraft paper pre filters, especially buyers who value fast communication, low MOQ, Trade Assurance support, and reliable reported delivery performance. The supplier may be appropriate for trial orders, replenishment orders, and price-sensitive sourcing programs where the buyer can validate product quality through samples or inspection.

Main risk points include the short 1-year Gold Supplier history, limited review count of only 5, lack of disclosed Finished Product Inspection data, and insufficient information on formal product certifications, production capacity, and quality control systems. These gaps make the supplier less suitable for large-scale procurement or highly regulated quality-sensitive projects without additional due diligence.

Growth potential exists due to the 5,000+ m² factory area, verified supplier status, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and CN¥405.6K+ transaction value in the past six months. A prudent procurement approach would be to begin with sample validation or a small trial order, confirm inspection standards, and then scale gradually if product consistency and delivery performance are verified.