zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Future Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Shenzhen Future Information Technology Co., Ltd.

Shenzhen Future Information Technology Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Future Information Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong with a reported factory area of 41,000+㎡ and 140+ staff. The company presents a strong platform credibility profile, supported by 17 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and listed service/quality labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service, and warranty availability. Its recent business performance is solid, with 300+ orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating from 100+ reviews. The supplier also shows strong delivery reliability with a 96.8% on-time dispatch rate. Based on the available data, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking a mature, platform-verified supplier with flexible MOQ options and customization support. Key limitations include insufficient data on independent factory certifications, detailed production capacity, export markets, and named customer references.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 41,000+㎡
- Employees: 140+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Independent factory certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier reports a sizeable factory footprint of over 41,000㎡, which indicates a relatively strong physical production base. The workforce of 140+ staff suggests an established operational structure, though the employee count is moderate compared with very large-scale manufacturers. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the company’s stated operational presence. However, the data does not provide detailed information on production lines, monthly output, machinery, capacity utilization, or internationally recognized factory certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The large factory area and verified supplier status support a high score in company strength. The company appears to have more than basic production capability and is likely better positioned than small workshops or trading-only entities based on the supplied factory size and staff count. However, because the employee scale is not exceptionally large and detailed production capacity data is not available, the score should not reach the maximum range reserved for highly transparent, large-scale supply chains with comprehensive factory certification details.

Final Score
18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier tenure: 17 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Listed labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available
- External compliance certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a long-standing presence, with 17 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong indicator of platform continuity and commercial traceability. Trade Assurance availability provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The supplier is also marked as verified, and the available labels show coverage across warranty, inspection, customization, and ODM service capability. However, the provided data does not include specific third-party certifications such as ISO, BSCI, CE, RoHS, or other industry-specific compliance documents.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, and multiple platform labels provides a strong credibility foundation. The 17-year tenure is particularly valuable from a procurement risk perspective because it indicates sustained platform activity. The only reason the score is not treated as risk-free is the lack of named independent compliance certificates or detailed audit documentation in the provided data.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 300+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.4M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 100+

Elaboration
The supplier has demonstrated measurable transaction activity in the recent six-month period. More than 300 orders and over CN¥1.4M in transaction value indicate active commercial demand and a meaningful level of buyer engagement. A 4.8 store rating supported by 100+ reviews reflects generally positive customer feedback. The order volume and transaction value suggest the supplier is not merely platform-listed but commercially active.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs strongly in business validation due to its combination of order volume, transaction value, rating, and review count. The 300+ recent orders and CN¥1.4M+ transaction value show a stable sales record. While the figures are strong, they are not sufficient to classify the supplier as an exceptionally high-volume platform leader without additional comparative category ranking data, repeat-buyer ratio, or long-term sales trend information.

Final Score
18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤2h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available
- Detailed communication metrics: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier provides a reported response time of within two hours, which is acceptable for international sourcing communication. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service labels indicates the supplier can support customized requirements beyond standard product supply. This is valuable for buyers requiring product adaptation, private-label development, or specification-based sourcing. However, the data does not provide further details on engineering support, sample lead time, multilingual sales support, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates solid service capability due to fast response time and customization support. However, because the response time is ≤2h rather than ≤1h, and because deeper service process data is unavailable, the supplier fits better into the strong-but-not-maximum range. The availability of both Full Customization and ODM service raises the score above a basic service level.

Final Score
8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis
- On-time dispatch rate: 96.8%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 96.8% on-time dispatch rate, which is a strong delivery performance indicator. This level exceeds the 90% benchmark used for the highest scoring range. A high on-time dispatch rate is particularly important for procurement planning, inventory control, and project-based purchasing where schedule reliability directly affects downstream operations.

Scoring Rationale
With an on-time dispatch rate above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the highest delivery performance range. The 96.8% figure indicates reliable order fulfillment based on the available platform data. No deduction is applied within this dimension because the reported delivery metric is clearly strong, although broader logistics data such as average lead time, late-shipment causes, or export delivery records is not provided.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True
- Warranty available: Listed
- Detailed defect rate, inspection reports, or certification documents: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a strong customer feedback profile, with a 4.8 rating and more than 100 reviews. The Finished Product Inspection label indicates that some form of final inspection process is available. Warranty availability also supports post-sale quality confidence. Verified supplier status further strengthens credibility. However, the data does not include detailed quality control procedures, defect rates, inspection standards, sample approval processes, or third-party quality certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier deserves a high score due to its positive rating, meaningful review count, Finished Product Inspection label, and warranty availability. These factors provide a reasonable level of quality assurance from a procurement standpoint. The score is not maximized because the data does not include detailed QC documentation, specific test standards, or independent quality certifications.

Final Score
18 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 18 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 18 / 20
Total Score 91 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for trial orders, customized projects, and buyers requiring platform-protected transactions.

Shenzhen Future Information Technology Co., Ltd. shows strong supplier fundamentals based on the provided data. The company has a sizeable factory area, verified supplier status, long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, solid recent order volume, positive customer feedback, and excellent on-time dispatch performance.

Suitable customer types include:
- Buyers seeking suppliers with long-term platform credibility
- Small to medium buyers requiring low MOQ purchasing, as listed products show MOQ of 1 piece
- Buyers needing Full Customization or ODM service
- Procurement teams prioritizing Trade Assurance and platform-verified supplier profiles
- Buyers requiring relatively reliable dispatch performance

Main risk points:
- Independent factory certifications are not provided
- Detailed production capacity and monthly output are not available
- No named customer references or export market data are provided
- Quality system details beyond Finished Product Inspection are insufficient
- Response time is good but not at the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour

Growth potential:
The supplier has clear growth potential due to its long platform history, active transaction record, customization capability, and strong delivery performance. If additional certifications, production capacity data, and detailed QC documentation can be provided, the supplier’s procurement suitability would become even stronger for larger-scale or more compliance-sensitive buyers.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Qingfen Tingxiu Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qingfen Tingxiu Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Emdoor Information Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Emdoor Information Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Future Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Future Agricultural Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chico Future Technology Group Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Chico Future Technology Group Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fujian Huolang Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Yingxin Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Yingxin Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Ninestar Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuhai Ninestar Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bosiny (Chengdu) Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Bosiny (Chengdu) Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Superwin Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Superwin Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Heimi Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Heimi Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wenyuan Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Wenyuan Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Winson Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Winson Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xiecheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xiecheng Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ctp Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Ctp Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Mingxi Taida Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xi'An Mingxi Taida Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiborui (Xianghe) Electronic Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meiborui (Xianghe) Electronic Information Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longtai Maimaiduo Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Longtai Maimaiduo Information Technology Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Future Boiler Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhangjiagang Future Boiler Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Tracy Future Tech Plastic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Nuanyan Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Nuanyan Knitting Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hefei Hd Machinery Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Hd Machinery Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan I-Believe Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan I-Believe Electronic Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Yinzhijian Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangqiu Yinzhijian Biotechnology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Solar Up Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Solar Up Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guang Zhou Cgood Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guang Zhou Cgood Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hanfang Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Hanfang Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qiaolan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Qiaolan Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Wohua Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Wohua Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Happy Life Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Happy Life Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Richtek Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Richtek Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Health Shining Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianqiao Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianqiao Science And Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hongju Security Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Hongju Security Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Dongfu Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Dongfu Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Emerson Metal Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Emerson Metal Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fo Bearings Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Fo Bearings Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yipeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yipeng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jia County Yihong Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jia County Yihong Abrasives Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Grand Nets Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hefei Grand Nets Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianjiantong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jianjiantong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026