zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Gobelike Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Gobelike Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of over 10,000㎡ and more than 220 staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized, production-capable supplier focused on mobile phone screen protection and related installation products, including tempered glass, TPU hydrogel film, dust-free installation boxes, and applicator kits. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 18 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, warranty availability, finished product inspection, and OEM-related platform tags. Commercial performance is moderate, with 30+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value in the past six months. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the review base is limited with only 4 reviews. This supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking established platform credibility, moderate-volume sourcing, and products requiring basic customization or inspection-backed supply.

Detailed Analysis

Shenzhen Gobelike Technology Co., Ltd.

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 10,000+㎡
- Employees: 220+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory verification: True
- Location: Guangdong, China

Elaboration
The supplier has a reported production footprint of over 10,000㎡ and a workforce exceeding 220 employees, indicating a meaningful manufacturing base rather than a small trading-only operation. The presence of verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in its operational existence and factory-level capability. However, the available data does not include annual production capacity, number of production lines, equipment details, or capacity utilization, so the scale cannot be classified as a fully proven large-scale supply chain.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates solid medium-scale factory strength with adequate space, staffing, and verification support. Its factory size and employee count are strong enough for stable supply, but the absence of detailed production capacity data prevents a top-tier score reserved for clearly large-scale and highly transparent manufacturers.

Final Score
17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 18 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a significant credibility signal, especially when combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status. The available tags also indicate warranty availability, finished product inspection, and OEM-related platform recognition. However, no specific international certifications such as ISO, BSCI, CE, RoHS, or SGS test reports are provided in the dataset, so compliance depth beyond platform-level verification cannot be confirmed.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has strong platform credibility due to long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verification. The score is high because these elements provide meaningful procurement protection and supplier traceability. It is not a perfect score because independent compliance certifications are not provided.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 30+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 4

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded commercial activity in the past six months, with more than 30 orders and transaction value above CN¥135.2K. This indicates active platform sales, but the transaction scale is moderate rather than high. The 5.0 store rating is positive, yet the number of reviews is only 4, which limits the statistical reliability of customer feedback. The business data supports the view of a functioning supplier with some market validation, but not enough evidence to classify it as a high-volume or heavily reviewed seller.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows stable but moderate business performance. Order count and transaction value are acceptable, while the perfect rating improves confidence. However, the very limited review count and moderate transaction volume prevent a high score in this category.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Customization tag: Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of three hours or less indicates acceptable communication efficiency for standard sourcing inquiries. The available customization information confirms minor customization capability, but there is no data showing Full Customization support. Therefore, the supplier appears suitable for buyers needing basic adjustments, but not necessarily for complex private-label development, advanced packaging customization, or engineering-heavy product adaptation.

Scoring Rationale
The response speed is reasonable, but it does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within one hour. Customization capability is present only at a minor level based on the provided data. Because Full Customization is not confirmed, the service score remains in the normal-to-good range rather than the top tier.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 85.7%

Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 85.7% falls within the 80%–89% range. This suggests acceptable but not outstanding delivery reliability. For buyers with flexible replenishment cycles, this level may be manageable. However, for strict launch schedules, promotional campaigns, or time-sensitive inventory planning, the delivery performance should be monitored closely.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring framework, an on-time delivery rate between 80% and 89% corresponds to 7–8 points. At 85.7%, the supplier sits in the middle-to-upper part of this range, supporting an 8-point score.

Final Score
8 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Reviews: 4
- Finished product inspection: Present
- Factory verification: True
- Warranty available: Present

Elaboration
The supplier benefits from a perfect 5.0 rating and has quality-related platform tags including finished product inspection and warranty availability. Factory verification also supports basic confidence in operational legitimacy and quality control traceability. However, the customer feedback base is very limited, with only 4 reviews, making it difficult to fully validate consistent quality performance across multiple buyers or repeated orders.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has positive quality indicators, especially finished product inspection and a 5.0 rating. Still, the limited review quantity weakens the reliability of customer feedback. The score reflects good basic quality assurance but not enough buyer feedback volume to justify a top-tier rating.

Final Score
16 / 20

Total Score

82 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scaling. Shenzhen Gobelike Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking mobile phone screen protector products, installation kits, and related accessories from a verified, long-standing supplier with Trade Assurance support. It is best suited for small to medium-volume buyers, trial orders, and buyers requiring basic customization rather than complex full customization.

Key risks include limited review volume, moderate six-month transaction value, unconfirmed Full Customization capability, and an on-time delivery rate below 90%. Growth potential is supported by its long Gold Supplier history, verified factory presence, finished product inspection tag, and established product range within phone protection accessories.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen W&F Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Moko Technology Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ideebo Technology Limted Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhiduojing Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuwei Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Shundarong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Peicheng Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Iwheels Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Puxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kace Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Chuangxinrui Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bozhida Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Guoyutong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jaster Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Panmin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flower Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Flower Medical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhongshan Songhai Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Songhai Electromechanical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping Joinwe Wire Mesh Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Anping Joinwe Wire Mesh Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Wennuan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Wennuan Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weizhisheng Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weizhisheng Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Dedu Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Dedu Food Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Xuxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Denghong Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tangshan Denghong Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linhai Tan'S Vacuum Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Linhai Tan'S Vacuum Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinwangda Flocking Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinwangda Flocking Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linchuan Safety Protective Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Linchuan Safety Protective Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Top Chef Smart Home Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Top Chef Smart Home Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Weifang Garfield Home Furnishing Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Second Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Second Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Everyoung Metals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Yinzhou Everyoung Metals Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinbiao Construction Materials Tech Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Jinbiao Construction Materials Tech Corp., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Dasheng Daily Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Daqiang Mechanical Equipment  Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Daqiang Mechanical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Wanjia Window And Door Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Wanjia Window And Door Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Michel Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Michel Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Edoo-Iot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Edoo-Iot Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026