zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Luoke Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Luoke Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering CARDSILK-branded PU leather notebooks, custom gift sets, corporate gifts, luxury business gifts, and holiday gift sets. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate production foundation with a 3,400+㎡ factory, 200+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is relatively solid, supported by 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and tags including low MOQ customization, warranty availability, and finished product inspection. Business performance appears active but not yet large-scale, with 30+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, a 4.6 store rating, and 8 reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a 96.6% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier is suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume customized notebooks and corporate gift products, especially where low MOQ and reliable delivery are important.

Shenzhen Luoke Electronics Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,400+㎡
  • Employees: 200+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable physical manufacturing base and a staff size that indicates established production capacity rather than a purely trading-oriented operation. A 3,400+㎡ facility with over 200 employees suggests the company can support regular production for notebook and gift set categories. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in the existence and legitimacy of the supplier’s operating base.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly output, equipment lists, factory audit reports, or capacity utilization. Therefore, while the company demonstrates a solid mid-sized factory profile, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain operator.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier fits the profile of a medium-sized stable factory. Its workforce of 200+ staff is a positive indicator, and the factory area is adequate for gift and notebook-related production. Verification status supports operational credibility. The absence of detailed production capacity data prevents a higher score in the large-scale category.

Final Score

17 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators. Four years as a Gold Supplier shows a reasonable operating history on the platform, while Trade Assurance provides an additional transaction protection mechanism for buyers. The verified supplier status and inspection-related tag further improve trustworthiness.

The listed tags are commercially useful, especially low MOQ customization and warranty availability. However, the provided data does not include third-party management system certifications, such as ISO certification, social compliance audits, or specific product compliance documentation. Therefore, the compliance profile is solid at the platform level but not fully comprehensive from a broader certification perspective.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility elements expected from a reliable supplier: Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and inspection-related tags. The 4-year Gold Supplier period is positive but not long enough to be considered a long-established platform history. Missing broader compliance documentation limits the score from reaching the highest range.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 30+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥338K+
  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 8

Elaboration

The supplier has demonstrated real transaction activity in the past six months, with more than 30 orders and over CN¥338K in transaction value. This indicates that the supplier is commercially active and has recent buyer engagement. The 4.6 store rating is generally positive and suggests acceptable buyer satisfaction.

However, the review count is relatively low at 8, which limits the statistical reliability of the rating. The order volume is also moderate rather than high. The data supports the conclusion that the supplier has stable but not high-volume verified commercial performance on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows meaningful recent transaction activity, but the scale is not large. CN¥338K+ in six months is a useful commercial signal, yet 30+ orders and only 8 reviews indicate that market validation remains moderate. The 4.6 rating supports a positive assessment, but the limited number of reviews prevents a higher score.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2 hours
  • Customization-related tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 2 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing. This is suitable for buyers who require timely quotation clarification, sample discussion, or order follow-up. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag suggests that the supplier can support some level of customization at relatively accessible order quantities.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization capability. There is also no information on design support, packaging customization depth, sample lead time, dedicated account management, or multilingual service capability. As a result, service capability can be considered functional and buyer-friendly, but not fully proven as advanced.

Scoring Rationale

The response time is good but not within the strongest ≤1 hour category. The low MOQ customization tag is positive, but Full Customization is not confirmed in the provided data. Therefore, the supplier should be rated as having normal-to-good service capability with basic customization support.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time shipment rate: 96.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s 96.6% on-time shipment rate is a strong delivery indicator. This exceeds the 90% threshold for the highest scoring range and suggests that the supplier has good order execution discipline. For corporate gifts and holiday gift sets, delivery reliability is particularly important because many orders are event-driven or seasonal.

The provided data does not include average lead time, sample delivery time, logistics methods, peak-season capacity, or late shipment reasons. Nevertheless, based strictly on the available on-time shipment rate, delivery performance is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions.

Scoring Rationale

A 96.6% on-time shipment rate qualifies for the top delivery performance category. Although more operational delivery details would be helpful, the available metric is strong enough to justify a high score.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.6
  • Number of reviews: 8
  • Finished product inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Factory verification / audit details: Insufficient Data beyond verified supplier status

Elaboration

The supplier has a good store rating of 4.6, indicating generally positive customer feedback. The presence of a “Finished product inspection” tag is a useful quality-control signal, suggesting that outgoing goods may be checked before shipment. Verified supplier status also supports baseline credibility.

However, the number of reviews is low, with only 8 available reviews. This limits the confidence level of the rating and makes it difficult to assess consistency across a larger buyer base. The data also does not provide defect rates, return rates, product testing reports, inspection standards, or detailed quality management certifications. Therefore, quality assurance appears present but not deeply validated.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and a finished product inspection tag, which supports a positive quality assessment. However, the limited review count and lack of detailed quality certification or inspection records prevent the supplier from reaching the highest score band. The quality profile is promising but still requires buyer-side verification through samples or pre-shipment inspection.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 17 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 17 / 20
Business Performance 14 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 81 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Shenzhen Luoke Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking small-to-medium volume customized notebooks, corporate gift sets, business gifts, and holiday gift products, especially where low MOQ, responsive communication, Trade Assurance, and strong on-time shipment performance are priorities.

The supplier’s main strengths are its verified factory profile, 200+ staff, 3,400+㎡ operating area, Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, finished product inspection tag, and 96.6% on-time shipment rate. These factors make it a practical candidate for trial orders and repeat procurement after sample approval.

Key risks include the relatively low number of reviews, moderate six-month order volume, and insufficient data on full customization capability, detailed factory audit results, production capacity, product certifications, and quality management systems. Buyers should request samples, confirm customization scope, verify packaging and inspection standards, and consider pre-shipment inspection before placing larger orders.

Overall, the supplier shows good growth potential and is best suited for buyers who need flexible MOQ gift sourcing with reliable delivery, while still applying standard supplier verification controls before scaling cooperation.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Anywii Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Anywii Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Edup Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Edup Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xuntuo Kesheng Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Xuntuo Kesheng Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Hxs Electronics Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mestek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mestek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Junuo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Junuo Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kixin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kixin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianyan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tianyan Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Homelead Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Homelead Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flexgreen Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Flexgreen Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Boxin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Boxin Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhibotong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhibotong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jintaiyi Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jintaiyi Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Creatall Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Creatall Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Form Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Form Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gaodashang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Gaodashang Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuodatong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Tuodatong Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiahao Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiahao Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fuyue Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianshi Plastic Packaging Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Tianshi Plastic Packaging Product Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Hebei Bangjun Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Bangjun Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yujiang (Cangzhou) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yujiang (Cangzhou) Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Dongye Automobile Accessories Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dingzhu Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dingzhu Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yu Jiacheng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Henan Yu Jiacheng Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Beiersidun Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Beiersidun Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ouyou Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Ouyou Electrical Appliance Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jinchengxin Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Jinchengxin Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Cop Auto Parts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yunmei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yunmei Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Neohope Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Neohope Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Huining International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anhui Huining International Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiajun Kitchen & Bath Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Jiajun Kitchen & Bath Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Mingtra Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Mingtra Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Mingxin Metallurgy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Mingxin Metallurgy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weizhi Internet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Weizhi Internet Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sany Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sany Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lance (Guangzhou) Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Lance (Guangzhou) Biological Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fs Circuit (Shenzhen) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fs Circuit (Shenzhen) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Qianzun Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Baoding Qianzun Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026