zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Shenzhen Picksmart Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Shenzhen Picksmart Technology Co., Limited
Location: Guangdong, China
Scoring System: 100 points total

Shenzhen Picksmart Technology Co., Limited

Executive Summary

Shenzhen Picksmart Technology Co., Limited is a Guangdong-based supplier with verified supplier status on and a relatively strong platform credibility profile. The company has been an Gold Supplier for 7 years, supports Trade Assurance, and carries several useful service and compliance-related labels, including warranty availability, finished product inspection, ODM service availability, and full customization. Its recent commercial performance shows moderate activity, with 40+ orders and CN¥202.8K+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 20+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong, with a reported 100.0% on-time dispatch rate. However, key company-scale data such as factory area and employee count are not provided, which limits assessment of production capacity and scalability. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified platform protection, small-to-medium order flexibility, customization support, and reliable delivery, while larger-volume buyers should conduct further factory capacity verification.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Country/Region: China
  • Province: Guangdong
  • Factory Area: Insufficient Data
  • Employee Count: Insufficient Data
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Listed product MOQ: 1 piece for provided products

Elaboration

The supplier is located in Guangdong, a major manufacturing region in China, and is marked as a verified supplier. This provides a basic level of credibility regarding supplier existence and platform-level verification. However, the available data does not include factory size, employee count, production lines, annual output, or equipment details. These missing elements are important for evaluating whether the company can support stable medium-to-large-scale procurement programs.

The low MOQ of 1 piece across the listed products indicates flexibility for sample orders or small-batch purchasing. However, MOQ alone does not confirm large-scale production capability.

Scoring Rationale

The verified supplier status supports a positive baseline assessment, but the absence of factory area and employee count significantly limits confidence in production scale. Based on the provided data, the company cannot be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain. It is more appropriate to assess it as a supplier with basic verified operating capability but insufficient disclosed manufacturing-scale evidence.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier Duration: 7 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Certification/Industry Labels:
  • Warranty available
  • Finished product inspection
  • ODM service available
  • Full customization

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 7-year Gold Supplier history indicates a relatively long operating record on compared with newer suppliers. Trade Assurance availability adds transactional protection for buyers, while verified supplier status strengthens platform-level trust.

The listed labels are also relevant from a procurement perspective. Warranty availability and finished product inspection support after-sales and quality-control expectations, while ODM service and full customization indicate that the supplier may support customized requirements within the scope stated on the platform.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets most of the strongest indicators for platform credibility: long Gold Supplier duration, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and multiple useful service/compliance labels. The only reason it does not receive a perfect score is that the provided data does not include detailed third-party factory audit reports, specific certificates, or named compliance standards.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in past 6 months: 40+
  • Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥202.8K+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Review count: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded measurable business activity in the recent six-month period. More than 40 orders and over CN¥202.8K in transaction value indicate active commercial operations, but the scale is moderate rather than high-volume. The 4.8 store rating is positive and suggests generally favorable customer feedback. However, the review count of 20+ is still relatively limited and does not represent a large historical feedback base.

The combination of moderate transaction volume and good rating suggests the supplier has market validation, but not enough evidence to classify it as a high-volume or deeply proven commercial supplier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs better than a low-activity supplier because it has clear recent order and transaction records. However, order volume, transaction value, and review count are not high enough to justify a top-tier score. The business performance is best assessed as stable but medium in scale.

Final Score

15 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤2h
  • Full Customization: Available
  • ODM Service: Available

Elaboration

The supplier shows solid service capability based on the available data. A response time of within two hours is commercially acceptable and indicates relatively efficient communication. The availability of full customization and ODM service is valuable for buyers requiring product adaptation or differentiated specifications.

However, the response time is not within the highest benchmark of ≤1 hour, and no additional data is provided regarding dedicated account managers, technical engineering support, quotation speed, language support, or after-sales response process.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a strong service score because it combines fast response with customization and ODM capability. Since the response time is ≤2 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and because deeper service-process data is unavailable, it falls slightly below the top scoring range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The reported on-time dispatch rate is excellent. A 100.0% on-time dispatch rate indicates that, based on the available platform data, the supplier has met its dispatch commitments for recorded transactions. This is a strong indicator for buyers concerned with delivery reliability, especially for small-to-medium orders.

No additional logistics data is provided, such as average lead time, shipping methods, delay history by region, or peak-season performance. Therefore, the score is based strictly on the reported on-time dispatch rate.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. With a reported rate of 100.0%, the supplier reaches the top level for this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Review count: 20+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Available
  • Verified Supplier: True
  • Warranty available: Yes

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.8, which reflects positive buyer feedback based on the available review data. Finished product inspection and warranty availability are also meaningful quality-related indicators, as they suggest that the supplier provides at least some level of quality assurance and post-sale support.

However, the number of reviews is only 20+, which is useful but not extensive. The data also does not include defect rates, inspection standards, test reports, return rates, product certifications, or detailed quality management system information. As a result, quality confidence is positive but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has a good rating and several quality-supporting labels, including finished product inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. However, the limited review quantity and absence of detailed quality certification or inspection records prevent a top-tier quality score. The supplier fits the category of good quality feedback with basic quality assurance evidence.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 12 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 15 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 80 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cautious cooperation, especially for sample orders, small-batch procurement, and customized purchasing projects.

Shenzhen Picksmart Technology Co., Limited shows strong platform credibility, reliable reported delivery performance, good store rating, and useful service capabilities such as full customization and ODM availability. The supplier is suitable for buyers who value Trade Assurance, verified supplier status, low MOQ flexibility, and relatively fast communication.

Suitable customer types:
- Small-to-medium buyers testing products before larger orders
- Buyers requiring low MOQ procurement
- Buyers needing customization or ODM-supported sourcing
- Buyers prioritizing platform transaction protection and on-time dispatch reliability

Main risks:
- Factory area: Insufficient Data
- Employee count: Insufficient Data
- Production capacity and scalability: Insufficient Data
- Review base is limited at 20+ reviews
- No detailed factory audit report, production line data, or specific product certification information provided

Growth potential:
The supplier has solid platform credibility and good delivery indicators. If it can provide factory scale data, production capacity documentation, detailed inspection reports, and more customer feedback over time, its procurement attractiveness for larger or longer-term sourcing programs would improve.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Topleo Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Higoal Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Cowon Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen T.D.S Electronic Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Midu Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Midu Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sectec Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Sectec Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vscam Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Vscam Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kingshowstar Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kingshowstar Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ugood Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ugood Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Feican Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Feican Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Coremy Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Coremy Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Onuliss Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Onuliss Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Inkmall Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Inkmall Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Melors Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Melors Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiutu Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jiutu Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Winking Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Winking Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ulite Precision Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Ulite Precision Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aurora Sound Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Aurora Sound Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kenrone Smart Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Kenrone Smart Technology Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Togloss Environmental Protection Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Togloss Environmental Protection Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Jinan Tuhe Elevator Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinan Tuhe Elevator Company Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lvju Waterproof Canvas Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Lvju Waterproof Canvas Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Color Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Color Powder Coating Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Xinde Shengfang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cangzhou Xinde Shengfang Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenghongxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Zhenghongxin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Aiters Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Changzhou Aiters Welding Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Loongsheen Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Loongsheen Import & Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Joylink Wire Mesh Factory Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Joylink Wire Mesh Factory Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Carlas Automobile Accessory Limited Company Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Carlas Automobile Accessory Limited Company Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xingdi New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Xingdi New Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zepeng Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wenzhou Zepeng Household Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hongjiang (Suzhou) Steel Structure Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hongjiang (Suzhou) Steel Structure Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Henglicai Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Henglicai Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xyyp Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xyyp Bearing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Charming Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Charming Steel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yitai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Yitai Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Congben Vehicle Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Congben Vehicle Fittings Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maxway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Maxway Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haike Ev Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haike Ev Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026