Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Jiangsu with a large reported factory footprint of 110,000+㎡ and 830+ staff. The company appears suitable for buyers seeking relatively large-scale supply capacity, particularly for portable appliance products such as the listed Vacmaster High Quality Portable 3 Speed item. Its platform credibility is supported by 8 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and a reported on-time delivery rate of 94.1%. Business performance shows strong transaction value in the past six months at CN¥25.6M+, although the order count is moderate at 20+ and customer review data is weak, with 0 reviews and no available shop rating. Service capability is acceptable but not exceptional, as response time is listed as within 10 hours and no Full Customization capability is provided. Overall, this supplier is more suitable for volume-oriented buyers who prioritize production scale and delivery reliability, while quality feedback should be further verified before large commitments.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 110,000+㎡
- Employees: 830+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a strong physical production base, with a large factory area and a sizeable workforce. These indicators suggest the company has the infrastructure and labor capacity to support medium-to-large procurement programs. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence in the existence and basic credibility of the manufacturing operation.

Scoring Rationale
The combination of 110,000+㎡ factory space and 830+ staff places the supplier clearly in the large-scale manufacturing category. Since verified supplier status is also provided, the company shows stronger structural reliability than suppliers with only basic company information. However, detailed production line count, annual capacity, or specific factory certification data are not provided, so the score is not set at the absolute maximum.

Final Score
19 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier years: 8 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤10h”, “On-time delivery 94.1%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a solid platform history, with 8 years of Gold Supplier status and Trade Assurance support. These are meaningful indicators for platform-level credibility and transaction protection. The available tags highlight response time and delivery performance, but there is no additional evidence of product-specific certifications or broader compliance documentation in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
Eight years as a Gold Supplier, combined with Trade Assurance and verified supplier status, provides a strong credibility foundation. The supplier meets the key platform trust requirements. However, the certification label set is limited, and no independent product certifications or detailed compliance documents are listed, preventing a full-score assessment.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month orders: 20+
- Past 6-month transaction value: CN¥25.6M+
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier shows strong transaction value over the past six months, indicating that existing buyers have placed meaningful commercial orders. However, the order count of 20+ suggests a moderate order frequency rather than very high order volume. The absence of a shop rating and the presence of 0 reviews reduce the visibility of buyer satisfaction and repeat purchasing confidence.

Scoring Rationale
CN¥25.6M+ in six-month transaction value is a strong commercial signal and supports the supplier’s business performance. However, the lack of shop rating and customer reviews creates a gap in market validation. The supplier appears commercially active, but the limited review evidence prevents classification as a fully proven high-feedback supplier.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤10h
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time within 10 hours indicates a basic acceptable communication standard for B2B sourcing. However, the data does not show whether the supplier supports Full Customization, OEM, ODM, private labeling, packaging customization, or engineering-level customization.

Scoring Rationale
A ≤10h response time is reasonable but does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within one hour. Since no customization capability is provided, the supplier cannot be rated as having strong service flexibility. The score reflects acceptable communication efficiency but limited evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score
6 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 94.1%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is above 90%, which is a strong indicator of delivery reliability. For buyers managing replenishment schedules, seasonal demand, or project-based procurement, this level of on-time performance is a positive operational signal.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 range. At 94.1%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery discipline. The score is set near the top, while allowing slight caution because no additional data is provided on lead time stability, delay handling, or logistics performance.

Final Score
9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Shop rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which supports basic quality and factory credibility. However, customer-facing quality feedback is weak because no shop rating is available and the review count is 0. There is also no provided evidence of Finished Product Inspection, product certification, inspection reports, or customer satisfaction records.

Scoring Rationale
The verified supplier status provides some assurance, but quality evaluation is limited by the absence of shop rating, reviews, and finished product inspection data. Since customer feedback is a major part of this dimension, the supplier cannot be rated highly despite its large factory scale. The score reflects basic quality credibility but insufficient customer validation.

Final Score
10 / 20

Total Score

77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled risk management. Suzhou Cleva Electric Appliance Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking large-scale production capacity, stable delivery performance, and platform-backed transaction protection. It is especially appropriate for volume-oriented importers, wholesalers, or retailers that can conduct their own product qualification and pre-shipment inspection.

Key risks include insufficient shop rating data, 0 customer reviews, no provided Finished Product Inspection information, and no stated Full Customization capability. Before placing large orders, buyers should request product test reports, inspection procedures, production lead time confirmation, and sample validation. The supplier’s growth potential is positive due to its large factory scale, strong transaction value, 8-year Gold Supplier status, and 94.1% on-time delivery performance.