Shijiazhuang Taige Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Shijiazhuang Taige Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 2,600+㎡ and 60+ staff. The supplier appears positioned for small-to-medium scale apparel customization and wholesale orders, covering products such as cotton streetwear, football jerseys, oversized graphic apparel, tracksuits, and distressed unisex summer wear. Its platform profile shows strong credibility indicators, including 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, and a strong on-time delivery rate of 98.1%. Business performance is also solid, with 400+ orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value over the past six months, supported by a 4.8 store rating and 100+ reviews. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ customized apparel, moderate production capacity, and reliable platform-backed transactions. However, available data does not confirm Full Customization capability or Finished Product Inspection, which should be verified before larger or quality-sensitive procurement programs.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Factory area: 2,600+㎡
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Supplier verification: True
- Location: Hebei, China
- Product scope includes streetwear, jerseys, tracksuits, and customized graphic apparel.
Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical production base with over 2,600㎡ of factory space and more than 60 employees. This indicates a supplier with basic-to-moderate production capacity rather than a very large-scale manufacturing operation. The presence of verified supplier status strengthens the credibility of its operational setup, but the provided data does not include detailed information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications.
The product data suggests a focus on apparel categories that typically require flexible production and customization handling, especially for low-MOQ orders. However, without clear production capacity figures or certification details, the company should be assessed as a stable but not large-scale supplier.
Scoring Rationale
The factory size and staff count indicate a real and functioning manufacturing or trading-supported production operation, but the scale is not large enough to be classified as a major industrial supplier. Verified supplier status improves confidence, yet there is insufficient data on factory certifications, audit depth, or production capacity to justify a top-tier score. Therefore, the supplier fits the category of a medium or small-to-medium stable factory with basic production capability.
Final Score
14 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified supplier: True
- Certification / industry tags:
- Low MOQ for customization
- On-time delivery 98.1%
- Response time ≤3h
Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates strong platform credibility. A 9-year Gold Supplier history is a significant positive indicator on , suggesting long-term platform presence and continuity. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with a platform-backed transaction protection mechanism, which is especially useful for international procurement. Verified supplier status further supports basic trustworthiness.
The listed platform tags are operationally relevant, particularly low MOQ customization, delivery performance, and response time. However, the provided data does not include detailed third-party certification names, factory audit documents, product compliance certificates, or industry-specific certifications. Therefore, the platform credibility is strong, while compliance documentation depth remains partially unverified.
Scoring Rationale
The combination of 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status represents a strong credibility profile. The supplier has long-term platform continuity and transaction protection mechanisms in place. The only limitation is the absence of detailed compliance certificates or factory audit documentation beyond the general verified supplier status. This supports a high score, though not a perfect one.
Final Score
19 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 400+
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥1.6M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 400 orders in six months indicates consistent buyer engagement and an active sales pipeline. A transaction value above CN¥1.6M further confirms that the supplier is not only receiving inquiries but also converting them into measurable transactions.
The store rating of 4.8 is a positive customer satisfaction indicator. The review count of 100+ gives the rating a reasonable level of credibility, although it is not an exceptionally large review base. Overall, the data points to a commercially active supplier with stable market validation on the platform.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier performs well across key business indicators: order volume, transaction value, rating, and review count. The 400+ recent orders and CN¥1.6M+ transaction value demonstrate meaningful sales momentum. The 4.8 rating supports customer satisfaction. The review base is sufficient but not large enough to assign the absolute maximum score. As a result, the supplier falls into the high-performance range.
Final Score
18 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Response time: ≤3h
- Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s stated response time of within 3 hours is commercially acceptable and suggests a reasonable communication standard for international buyers. The “Low MOQ for customization” tag indicates some level of customization support, especially suitable for small-batch or trial orders.
However, the provided information does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, including detailed design development, fabric selection, private labeling, packaging customization, size grading, or sample iteration. Therefore, the supplier can be recognized as having basic customization capability, but not verified as a strong full-service customization partner.
Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤3h is good but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1h. The supplier appears suitable for low-MOQ customization, but the absence of confirmed Full Customization limits the service capability score. The supplier is therefore assessed as having normal response efficiency and basic customization capability rather than advanced service capability.
Final Score
7 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 98.1%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 98.1% is a strong operational indicator. According to the scoring framework, delivery performance above 90% qualifies for the highest score range. This level of performance suggests that the supplier has effective order handling and shipment coordination within the platform-recorded data.
For apparel procurement, delivery reliability is particularly important for seasonal products, campaign launches, and retail replenishment. A 98.1% on-time delivery rate provides strong evidence that the supplier can manage fulfillment commitments effectively.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier clearly exceeds the 90% threshold required for the top delivery score band. With an on-time delivery rate of 98.1%, delivery risk appears low based on the available data. No negative delivery indicators were provided.
Final Score
10 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 100+
- Verified supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: True, based on verified supplier status provided
Elaboration
The supplier’s customer feedback profile is positive, with a 4.8 store rating and more than 100 reviews. This indicates generally favorable buyer experience and provides a reasonable level of commercial validation. The verified supplier status also adds a basic layer of credibility regarding the supplier’s business presence.
However, the data does not confirm the existence of Finished Product Inspection. There is also no detailed information on quality control workflow, inspection standards, defect rate, sample approval process, product testing, or apparel-specific compliance certificates. For customized apparel, these quality assurance details are important, especially when buyers require consistent sizing, fabric quality, print durability, stitching quality, and color accuracy.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has good customer feedback and a credible review base, which supports a strong but not top-level quality score. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and detailed quality control documentation prevents the supplier from reaching the 18–20 score range. The supplier should be considered to have positive customer feedback and basic quality credibility, but buyers should verify inspection procedures before placing larger orders.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 14 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 19 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 18 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 7 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 10 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 84 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for low-MOQ customized apparel and small-to-medium batch procurement.
Shijiazhuang Taige Import & Export Trading Co., Ltd. demonstrates strong platform credibility, stable recent business performance, and excellent delivery reliability. Its 9-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 400+ recent orders, CN¥1.6M+ transaction value, and 98.1% on-time delivery rate make it a commercially credible supplier for apparel buyers.
Suitable customer types include:
- Start-up apparel brands requiring low MOQ customization
- Small and medium retailers sourcing streetwear or jersey-related apparel
- Buyers testing new designs or seasonal products
- Importers seeking platform-protected transactions through Trade Assurance
Main risks:
- Full Customization capability is not confirmed.
- Finished Product Inspection information is not provided.
- Factory scale is moderate, not large-scale.
- Detailed quality control systems, audit reports, and product compliance certifications are Insufficient Data.
Growth potential:
The supplier shows strong marketplace activity and reliable delivery performance. If it can provide clearer quality inspection procedures, product compliance documentation, and confirmed full customization services, it may become suitable for larger and more quality-sensitive procurement programs.
Leave your comment