zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd. is a China-based cap supplier located in Hebei, with a reported factory area of 2,000+㎡ and 140+ staff. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a medium-sized, operationally established supplier with verified supplier status, 18 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and strong recent commercial performance. Its product range focuses on caps, including 5-panel caps, 6-panel unstructured caps, blank baseball caps, and custom logo cap products, with relatively low MOQs of 50–100 pieces. The supplier shows strong delivery reliability with a 98.3% on-time delivery rate and solid customer-facing indicators, including a 4.8 store rating and 100+ reviews. It is suitable for buyers seeking stable cap sourcing, low-to-medium MOQ customization, and platform-backed transaction protection. Key limitations are the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data and no clear confirmation of Full Customization capability.

Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Company name: Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd.
  • Country/region: China, Hebei
  • Factory area: 2,000+㎡
  • Employees: 140+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a reported physical factory scale of more than 2,000 square meters and a workforce of more than 140 employees. This indicates a meaningful manufacturing base rather than a very small workshop or purely trading-oriented operation. The company is also marked as a verified supplier, which strengthens the credibility of its factory presence and operating structure.

The available product listings are focused on cap categories, suggesting specialization in headwear products rather than a broad, unfocused catalog. MOQs of 50–100 pieces indicate that the factory may support flexible order quantities, which can be beneficial for small to medium buyers or brands testing new designs.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates a stable mid-sized production profile. The factory area and employee count are sufficient to support ongoing production, but the data does not indicate a very large-scale industrial operation. While verified supplier status supports confidence in its operational legitimacy, there is no additional detailed data on production lines, monthly output, machinery, capacity utilization, or factory audit reports beyond the verified supplier indicator.

Given the combination of 2,000+㎡ factory space, 140+ staff, and verified supplier status, the supplier fits best into the “medium-sized stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Platform/industry tags:
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • On-time delivery 98.3%
  • Response time ≤2h

Elaboration

The supplier has an 18-year Gold Supplier history, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. Long-term platform presence generally supports supplier continuity and transaction history, provided that other indicators are also consistent. The presence of Trade Assurance further improves buyer protection during transactions, especially for international procurement where payment security and order fulfillment control are important.

The supplier is also listed as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to its factory and business profile. The available platform tags show strengths in low MOQ customization, delivery performance, and response speed. However, the provided data does not include a full list of formal third-party certifications or detailed audit documentation.

Scoring Rationale

This is one of the supplier’s strongest dimensions. An 18-year Gold Supplier record is significantly above average and indicates long-term platform continuity. Trade Assurance support and verified supplier status provide important platform-backed credibility. The compliance profile is strong from a marketplace reliability perspective.

The score is not a perfect 20 because the provided data does not include detailed factory audit certificates, compliance documents, or complete certification records. Although one product title contains “BSCI,” the data does not formally list BSCI as a verified certification, so it cannot be counted as confirmed compliance evidence.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 600+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥6M+
  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Number of reviews: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent marketplace performance, with more than 600 orders and more than CN¥6 million in transaction value over the past six months. These figures indicate active buyer demand and a meaningful level of commercial validation. The 4.8 store rating is positive and suggests that buyers generally report satisfactory experiences.

The review count of 100+ provides a reasonable customer feedback base, though it is not extremely large. Combined with the transaction and order volume, the data suggests that the supplier is not only listed on the platform but is actively receiving and fulfilling orders.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies as a high-performing platform seller based on the provided six-month order and transaction data. The order quantity is strong, transaction value is substantial, and the store rating is favorable. These indicators support confidence in the supplier’s ability to handle recurring commercial demand.

The score is slightly below the maximum because the review base, while solid, is not exceptionally large, and the data does not provide more granular indicators such as repeat buyer rate, dispute rate, refund rate, or category-level sales distribution.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤2h
  • Platform tag: Response time ≤2h
  • Platform tag: Low MOQ for customization
  • Product listings include custom logo cap products
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier provides a response time of within two hours, which is a positive service indicator. This suggests that the supplier is reasonably responsive and can support buyer communication within a practical timeframe. The platform tag “Low MOQ for customization” and several product listings referencing custom logo caps indicate that the supplier offers some level of customization service.

However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization.” There is no detailed information on design development, material customization, packaging customization, sample lead time, artwork support, OEM/ODM capabilities, or dedicated account management.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good communication responsiveness, though not at the highest level defined by the scoring system, which requires response time of less than or equal to one hour for top scoring. The customization signal is positive but incomplete. Low MOQ customization and custom logo product listings are valuable for buyers needing branding flexibility, but Full Customization cannot be confirmed from the available data.

Therefore, the supplier fits the “normal response with basic customization capability” range rather than the highest service capability category.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 98.3%

Elaboration

The supplier reports an on-time delivery rate of 98.3%, which is a very strong delivery performance indicator. This exceeds the 90% threshold required for the highest scoring range under the specified evaluation standard. For procurement buyers, a high on-time delivery rate is especially important for seasonal products, promotional merchandise, retail replenishment, and brand launch schedules.

The same 98.3% figure is also reflected in the platform tag, reinforcing consistency within the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

Based strictly on the stated scoring criteria, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 98.3%, this supplier is near the upper end of the delivery reliability range. There is no provided evidence of delivery issues, delay frequency, or logistics instability.

Given the strong percentage, the supplier receives the maximum score in this dimension.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.8
  • Reviews: 100+
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: Verified supplier status provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a 4.8 store rating and more than 100 reviews, indicating generally positive customer feedback. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence that the supplier’s business and/or factory profile has undergone some level of platform verification.

However, the data does not explicitly confirm Finished Product Inspection. There is also no detailed information on quality control workflow, inspection standards, defect rate, sample approval process, internal QC team, or third-party inspection availability. As a result, the quality assurance system cannot be fully validated beyond customer rating, review count, and verified supplier status.

Scoring Rationale

The customer feedback indicators are favorable. A 4.8 rating is strong, and 100+ reviews provide a meaningful but not extensive feedback base. Verified supplier status adds support to the quality credibility profile, but the absence of explicit Finished Product Inspection data prevents the supplier from reaching the highest score range.

The supplier fits the “good rating with basic quality assurance indicators” category. It is stronger than suppliers with limited feedback or weak ratings, but not enough data is provided to confirm a fully developed quality management system.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 10 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 16 / 20
Total Score 86 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, especially for low-to-medium MOQ cap sourcing and custom logo cap orders.

Xiongxian Kaixin Cap Co., Ltd. shows strong platform credibility, long operating history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, solid commercial traction, and excellent delivery performance. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking baseball caps, 5-panel caps, 6-panel caps, blank caps, and custom logo cap products with relatively flexible MOQs of 50–100 pieces.

Suitable Customer Types

  • Small and medium brands requiring low MOQ cap customization
  • Promotional product buyers needing logo caps
  • E-commerce sellers testing multiple cap designs
  • Importers seeking a platform-verified supplier with Trade Assurance
  • Buyers prioritizing on-time shipment reliability

Main Risk Points

  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data
  • No detailed information provided on production capacity, machinery, monthly output, QC process, defect rate, or third-party audit reports
  • Formal certifications are not sufficiently confirmed in the provided data

Growth Potential

The supplier has strong growth potential within cap customization and repeat-order procurement due to its long platform history, high recent transaction volume, strong on-time delivery rate, and low MOQ customization positioning. For larger or compliance-sensitive buyers, additional verification of quality inspection procedures, customization scope, and formal certification documents is recommended before scaling order volume.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kwinpack Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foodmate Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Metallics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Medsinglong Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gauss (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Gauss (Jiaxing) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Bescanled Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Shipuller Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Whale Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zouping Beautex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zouping Beautex Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruitian Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ruitian Cable Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
New Powerful Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Monro M&E Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Blueendless Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Postek Electronics Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Kaer Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang J&J Mobility Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang J&J Mobility Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianck Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hochey Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulomax Architectural Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pulomax Architectural Products (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Ap Group (China) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Ap Group (China) Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Zerui Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingzhou Zerui Automation Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Suzhou Link Sense Intelligent Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Taixinli Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao Taixinli Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Vit Sci & Tec Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Vit Sci & Tec Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Quanshunding Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xingtai Quanshunding Seal Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinwei Kangda Medical Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beijing Jinwei Kangda Medical Instrument Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Homful Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Homful Import And Export Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Associated Engineers Zhuhai S.E.Z. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Associated Engineers Zhuhai S.E.Z. Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuyuan Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Fuyuan Vehicle Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yiqi Sports Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yiqi Sports Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dalei Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xiamen Dalei Stone Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Careud Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Chenchao Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Chenchao Wire Mesh Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Mixtec Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Mixtec Electric Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Yasoo Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Yasoo Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Getech Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinlixiang Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Jinlixiang Composite Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe Tengao Mechanical And Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luohe Tengao Mechanical And Electrical Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Feiyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangyin Feiyang Instrument Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026