Xuchang Tioupi Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Xuchang Tioupi Trading Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Henan, with a reported factory area of 10,000+㎡ and 90+ staff. Based on the provided -related data, the company shows a relatively solid operating foundation, supported by Verified Supplier status, 5 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and an on-time delivery rate of 90.5%. Its recent commercial performance is comparatively active, with 700+ orders and CN¥2.2M+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking low-MOQ wig and human hair products, especially small to mid-sized retailers, online sellers, and buyers requiring customization flexibility. Key limitations include a moderate store rating of 4.3 and limited available data on production capacity, detailed factory audit scope, export markets, and customer references. Overall, the supplier demonstrates good platform credibility and transaction activity, but quality consistency should be monitored through sample orders and inspection controls.

Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength — 20 Points
Basis
- Company: Xuchang Tioupi Trading Co., Ltd.
- Location: Henan, China
- Factory area: 10,000+㎡
- Employees: 90+ staff
- Verified Supplier: True
- Product focus based on listed products: wigs / human hair wig-related products
- Specific production capacity: Insufficient Data
- Detailed factory audit report or factory certification scope: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a reported factory area exceeding 10,000㎡, which indicates a meaningful physical operating base. The employee count of 90+ suggests a medium-sized operation rather than a very large-scale industrial manufacturer. The Verified Supplier status provides some support for the company’s legitimacy and factory-related credibility, but the data does not provide detailed production line numbers, monthly output, equipment information, or formal factory certification details.
The company’s listed product range is concentrated in wig and human hair products, including lace front, transparent lace, Brazilian virgin hair, and raw human hair wig categories. This suggests some specialization within the hair product segment. However, without production capacity data, it is not possible to fully verify whether the supplier can consistently support very large-volume procurement programs.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates stronger-than-basic company strength due to its 10,000+㎡ facility, 90+ staff, and Verified Supplier status. These indicators support a stable medium-sized supply capability. However, it does not reach the highest scoring range because the available data does not confirm large-scale production capacity, advanced factory certifications, detailed audit results, or major enterprise-level manufacturing infrastructure. Therefore, it is best assessed as a medium-scale stable supplier with credible but not fully proven large-scale capacity.
Final Score
17 / 20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 5 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Verified Supplier: True
- Platform/industry tags provided:
- Finished Product Inspection
- Full Customization
- On-time delivery 90.5%
- Response time ≤4h
Elaboration
The supplier has 5 years of Gold Supplier history, which is a positive platform credibility indicator. Trade Assurance support is also important for procurement risk control, especially for buyers placing first-time or trial orders. Verified Supplier status further strengthens the supplier’s platform credibility, as it indicates that some level of supplier verification has been completed.
The listed tags are also relatively complete from a platform procurement perspective. Finished Product Inspection supports quality control visibility, Full Customization indicates service flexibility, and delivery/response metrics provide measurable performance references. However, the data does not include external certifications, detailed compliance certificates, factory audit documents, or industry-specific certification standards.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile: 5-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, Verified Supplier status, and several operational tags. This places it above suppliers with only basic platform presence. However, because the data does not confirm third-party factory certifications, international compliance certificates, or detailed audit documentation, the supplier should not receive a perfect score. Its credibility is strong within the available platform-based framework but not fully validated beyond that.
Final Score
18 / 20
3. Business Performance — 20 Points
Basis
- Orders in past 6 months: 700+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.2M+
- Store rating: 4.3
- Reviews: 100+
Elaboration
The supplier shows active recent business performance. More than 700 orders over six months indicates strong order flow and a meaningful level of buyer activity. The transaction value of CN¥2.2M+ also confirms that the store has generated measurable commercial volume, rather than only displaying products without transaction validation.
The review count of 100+ provides a reasonable customer feedback base. However, the store rating of 4.3 is moderate rather than excellent. While it does not indicate poor performance, it suggests that buyer satisfaction may not be consistently at a top-tier level. For procurement decisions, this rating should be interpreted carefully, especially for buyers with strict expectations on hair quality, consistency, packaging, or after-sales service.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier’s six-month order count and transaction value are strong indicators of commercial activity. These figures support the view that the supplier has real market traction and is capable of handling frequent orders. However, the 4.3 store rating prevents the supplier from being scored in the highest tier, as high order volume alone does not fully confirm consistent customer satisfaction. The business performance is therefore strong, but with some quality/service perception risk reflected in the rating.
Final Score
17 / 20
4. Service Capability — 10 Points
Basis
- Response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization: listed as available
- Detailed customization process: Insufficient Data
- Dedicated account service or multilingual support: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of ≤4 hours is acceptable for cross-border procurement communication and indicates a reasonable level of responsiveness. The Full Customization tag is a positive service capability indicator, particularly for wig and hair product buyers who may require customized lengths, lace types, colors, density, or packaging. However, the provided data does not specify what customization options are actually available, nor does it include lead times for customized orders.
The minimum order quantity of 1 piece on listed products also suggests flexibility for samples or small-batch purchasing. This is useful for smaller buyers, online sellers, or brands that need to test product quality before scaling up. Still, because the response time is not within the ≤1h top-tier range and detailed customization capability is not documented, service capability should be rated as good but not excellent.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has clear service advantages through Full Customization and a reasonable ≤4h response time. This supports a good service score. However, the top score range requires very fast response, typically ≤1 hour, combined with strong customization evidence. Since the actual customization scope and process are not detailed, the score remains in the upper-middle range rather than the highest range.
Final Score
8 / 10
5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 90.5%
Elaboration
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 90.5% meets the threshold for the highest delivery performance category under the given scoring standard. This indicates that the majority of orders are shipped within the expected timeframe. For buyers managing e-commerce inventory or repeat replenishment cycles, this is an important operational advantage.
However, the data does not provide average lead time, production lead time for customized orders, peak season delivery performance, or logistics channel details. Therefore, while the on-time shipment percentage is strong, buyers should still confirm delivery timelines before placing bulk or customized orders.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring rule, suppliers with on-time delivery above 90% should receive 9–10 points. At 90.5%, this supplier qualifies for the high-performance delivery range. Since the percentage only slightly exceeds the 90% threshold and no additional delivery details are provided, a score of 9 is more appropriate than 10.
Final Score
9 / 10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points
Basis
- Store rating: 4.3
- Reviews: 100+
- Finished Product Inspection: listed
- Verified Supplier: True
- Factory Verification / detailed verification scope: Insufficient Data
- Product-specific defect rate or return rate: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier has a reasonable customer feedback base with 100+ reviews. The store rating of 4.3 indicates generally acceptable but not outstanding buyer satisfaction. In the hair and wig category, quality consistency is especially important because product perception may depend on hair material, density, lace quality, color accuracy, shedding, tangling, and durability. However, none of these detailed quality indicators are provided in the dataset, so they cannot be independently evaluated.
The Finished Product Inspection tag is a positive quality assurance indicator. It suggests that finished goods inspection is part of the supplier’s platform-labeled capabilities. Verified Supplier status also supports a basic level of supplier credibility. Nevertheless, the data does not include inspection standards, AQL levels, third-party inspection reports, test reports, or product return statistics.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has several quality-related positives: Finished Product Inspection, Verified Supplier status, 100+ reviews, and active transaction history. These support a good quality assurance foundation. However, the 4.3 rating is not high enough to support a top-tier score, and the lack of detailed quality control documentation creates some uncertainty. The supplier is therefore assessed as having acceptable to good quality assurance, but bulk buyers should use samples, clear specifications, and inspection requirements before scaling orders.
Final Score
16 / 20
Total Score
| Dimension | Score |
|---|---|
| Company Strength | 17 / 20 |
| Platform & Compliance Credibility | 18 / 20 |
| Business Performance | 17 / 20 |
| Service Capability | 8 / 10 |
| Delivery Performance | 9 / 10 |
| Quality & Customer Feedback | 16 / 20 |
| Total Score | 85 / 100 |
Procurement Recommendation
Recommendation: Recommended for trial cooperation and controlled scaling.
Xuchang Tioupi Trading Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking wig and human hair products with low MOQ, platform transaction protection, customization availability, and relatively strong recent order activity. The supplier is particularly appropriate for small to mid-sized retailers, online sellers, boutique hair brands, and buyers who need sample flexibility before bulk purchasing.
Main strengths include:
- 10,000+㎡ reported factory area and 90+ staff
- 5-year Gold Supplier status
- Trade Assurance support
- Verified Supplier status
- 700+ orders and CN¥2.2M+ transactions in the past six months
- Full Customization and Finished Product Inspection tags
- 90.5% on-time delivery rate
Main risks include:
- Store rating is 4.3, which is acceptable but not top-tier
- Detailed production capacity is not provided
- Detailed factory audit scope is not provided
- No defect rate, return rate, or third-party quality report is available
- Customization scope and lead time are not specified
Suggested procurement approach:
Start with sample orders or small trial batches, define product specifications clearly, request pre-shipment photos or inspection records, and use Trade Assurance for initial transactions. If sample quality, communication, and delivery performance are confirmed, the supplier has potential for repeat purchasing and moderate-scale cooperation.
Leave your comment