zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Yao Ling Health Management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Yao Ling Health Management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Guangdong, offering OEM and customized soft serve ice cream and high-protein soft serve ice cream powder products with a stated MOQ of 100 bags and a price range of CN¥13.53–16.91 across listed products. The supplier shows moderate manufacturing capacity, supported by a 7,700+㎡ factory area, 70+ staff, and verified supplier status. Platform credibility is strengthened by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and ODM-related labels, although the Gold Supplier tenure is relatively short at 2 years. Business performance is moderate, with 70+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, but the store rating of 4.2 and 20+ reviews indicate limited customer feedback depth. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking mid-scale OEM/customized soft serve powder sourcing with platform-backed transaction protection.

Yao Ling Health Management (guangzhou) Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 7,700+㎡
  • Employees: 70+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a disclosed factory area of more than 7,700㎡ and over 70 employees, indicating a physical production base with measurable operational scale. The company is not positioned as a very large-scale manufacturer based on the provided employee count, but the factory size suggests capacity beyond a small workshop-level operation. The verified supplier status provides additional support that the supplier has undergone some form of platform or third-party verification.

Scoring Rationale

The company demonstrates stable mid-sized production capability. The factory area is relatively solid, while the employee count of 70+ suggests moderate labor and operational capacity rather than large-scale industrial production. Verified supplier status improves confidence in the legitimacy of the company and its production base. However, no additional factory audit details, production line count, annual capacity, or international factory certifications are provided. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “medium stable factory” range rather than the top-tier large-scale supply chain category.

Final Score

15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier tenure: 2 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry labels:
  • OEM for well-known brands
  • Finished product inspection
  • Full customization
  • ODM service available

Elaboration

The supplier has several important platform credibility indicators, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. These elements reduce transaction risk compared with suppliers lacking platform protection. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and customization-related labels also supports operational transparency and service capability. However, the Gold Supplier history is only 2 years, which is relatively short and does not yet indicate long-term platform maturity.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has the core platform credibility components: Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, and verification. These are meaningful indicators for procurement risk control. The 2-year Gold Supplier tenure, however, limits the assessment compared with suppliers that have maintained platform credibility over a longer period. In addition, while platform labels are provided, there is no detailed evidence of specific food safety certifications, export compliance certificates, or internationally recognized quality management certifications. Such information is Insufficient Data. Overall, credibility is good but not yet at the highest level.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 70+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥135.2K+
  • Store rating: 4.2
  • Number of reviews: 20+

Elaboration

The supplier has recorded more than 70 orders in the past six months, showing active commercial engagement on the platform. The transaction value of CN¥135.2K+ indicates real buyer activity, though the overall transaction scale is moderate rather than high. The store rating of 4.2 is acceptable but not outstanding, and the review count of 20+ provides some buyer feedback but remains limited for a highly validated supplier profile.

Scoring Rationale

The order count demonstrates that the supplier has ongoing sales activity and is not commercially inactive. However, the transaction value is not high enough to indicate large-volume market penetration. The 4.2 rating is a key limiting factor because it suggests customer satisfaction is reasonable but not especially strong. The number of reviews is also relatively limited, which reduces the depth of market validation. Therefore, the supplier is best assessed as having moderate business performance, with sufficient but not strong commercial proof.

Final Score

14 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

  • Response time: ≤3 hours
  • Full customization: Listed
  • ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of within 3 hours is acceptable for platform-based sourcing and indicates reasonable communication efficiency. The supplier also lists Full Customization and ODM service availability, which suggests it can support customized product requirements rather than only standard product sales. This is relevant for buyers seeking private label or formula-adjusted soft serve ice cream powder products, although the exact customization scope is not detailed in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier does not meet the highest service benchmark of response within 1 hour, but a response time of ≤3 hours remains commercially practical. Full Customization and ODM service labels strengthen its service capability. However, details such as sample lead time, R&D support, packaging design support, formula development capacity, or multilingual sales support are not provided and should be treated as Insufficient Data. The supplier therefore receives a strong but not top-level service score.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

  • On-time dispatch rate: 94.9%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 94.9% is above the 90% threshold, indicating relatively reliable delivery execution. For procurement planning, this is a positive indicator because timely dispatch is important for inventory control, seasonal product planning, and replenishment scheduling.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. At 94.9%, the supplier demonstrates strong delivery performance. However, the data only reflects dispatch punctuality and does not provide information on international transit reliability, logistics options, average lead time, or historical delay causes. These areas remain Insufficient Data. Based strictly on the provided dispatch rate, the supplier deserves a high score.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.2
  • Reviews: 20+
  • Finished Product Inspection: Listed
  • Verified supplier: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label and verified supplier status, both of which support basic quality assurance credibility. The store rating of 4.2 indicates generally acceptable buyer feedback, but it is not high enough to be considered excellent. The review count of 20+ provides some market feedback, but the sample size remains relatively small for a strong quality confidence assessment.

Scoring Rationale

The Finished Product Inspection label is a meaningful positive indicator, especially for product categories where batch consistency and finished goods quality are important. Verified supplier status also improves confidence. However, the customer feedback profile is moderate rather than strong: a 4.2 rating does not indicate top-tier satisfaction, and 20+ reviews are not enough to establish broad quality reliability. No detailed defect rate, complaint rate, food safety certification, laboratory testing, or product compliance documentation is provided; these points are Insufficient Data. The supplier therefore receives a solid but not premium quality score.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 15 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 14 / 20
Service Capability 8 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 77 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditional cooperation recommended.

Yao Ling Health Management (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers looking for a mid-scale Chinese supplier of OEM or customized soft serve ice cream powder products, particularly those requiring Trade Assurance, moderate MOQ levels, and customization/ODM support. The supplier’s strengths include verified supplier status, a 7,700+㎡ factory area, 70+ staff, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and a strong on-time dispatch rate of 94.9%.

However, buyers should manage several risks before placing large-volume orders. The main concerns are the relatively short 2-year Gold Supplier history, moderate transaction value, limited review base, and store rating of 4.2. Food safety certifications, export compliance documentation, production capacity, testing reports, and detailed factory audit results are Insufficient Data and should be requested before strategic procurement.

The supplier has growth potential for private-label, OEM, and customized soft serve powder projects, but initial cooperation should begin with sample testing, small trial orders, and clear quality inspection requirements.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Shanghai Duolaian Health Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Duolaian Health Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jizhi Health Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jizhi Health Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kang Rui Ling Shu (Suzhou) Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kang Rui Ling Shu (Suzhou) Intelligent Medical Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Balanced Management Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Balanced Management Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bangyue Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bangyue Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Olbetter Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Olbetter Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Miningwell Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Miningwell Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidinghong International Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangdong Yidinghong International Supply Chain Management Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Health & Health (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Health & Health (Group) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Beyond Health Tech Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Mt Health Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Mt Health Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Aoj Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Aoj Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wansongtang Health Group Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Wansongtang Health Group Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fittop Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Fittop Health Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yoosen (Wenzhou) Health Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yoosen (Wenzhou) Health Development Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Kanghua Health Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Nanchang Kanghua Health Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Qinshantang Health Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangsu Qinshantang Health Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Holsomed Health & Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Holsomed Health & Medical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Bohong Health Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shaanxi Bohong Health Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Czine Light Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Czine Light Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhuzhou Hechuang Medium-High Frequency Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuzhou Hechuang Medium-High Frequency Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Muhe Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Muhe Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Super Commercial Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Super Commercial Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Fenan Aluminum Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Fenan Aluminum Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Wanhao Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuchang Wanhao Hair Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory Supplier Evaluation
Pingdu Qianmei Eyelash Factory Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Xinqidian Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Wuhan Xinqidian Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Yuanji Gift Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Qingtian Hydraulic Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Luoyang Qingtian Hydraulic Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Client Diesel Engine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Client Diesel Engine Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Weiwin Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhengzhou Weiwin Machinery Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ganxin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hangzhou Ganxin Electronic Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Etross Telecom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Etross Telecom Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Sada Metal Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Sada Metal Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shangrao Menglu Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Fengya Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ningbo Fengya Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sidley Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sidley Chemical Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yujing Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Yujing Building Materials Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bobo Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Yiwu Bobo Crafts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Shunkun Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Shunkun Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026