Yingtan Yujiang District Qianyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Yingtan Yujiang District Qianyuan E-Commerce Co., Ltd. is a China-based eyewear supplier located in Jiangxi, offering optical glasses, sunglasses, acetate eyewear frames, rimless sunglasses, and ready-stock fashion eyewear products. The supplier shows a practical sourcing profile for buyers seeking low-to-medium MOQ eyewear products, with listed MOQs ranging from 5 to 100 pieces and product prices mainly positioned in accessible RMB price bands. Its factory area of 9,200+ sqm indicates a meaningful operating base, while the 20+ staff size suggests a relatively lean workforce rather than a large-scale manufacturing organization. Platform credibility is supported by Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, and a 93.1% on-time delivery rate. Commercial activity is also visible, with 300+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small-to-medium buyers, online retailers, and eyewear distributors requiring flexible MOQ, customization options, and moderate commercial reliability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
The supplier is based in Jiangxi, China, with a factory area of 9,200+ sqm, 20+ staff, and verified supplier status marked as True.

Elaboration:
The factory area indicates that the supplier has a meaningful physical operating base and is not presented as a very small workshop. However, the reported employee count of 20+ staff is relatively limited compared with larger industrial-scale eyewear manufacturers. The available data confirms supplier verification, but does not provide detailed factory audit reports, production lines, monthly capacity, machinery lists, or specific factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale:
The company demonstrates basic-to-moderate production strength due to its sizeable factory space and verified supplier status. However, the small workforce and lack of disclosed production capacity data limit confidence in large-volume scalability. It appears stronger than a small trading-only profile, but the available evidence does not support classification as a large-scale stable supply chain.

Final Score: 14/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
The supplier is an Gold Supplier for 1 year, supports Trade Assurance, is marked as a verified supplier, and carries platform/industry tags including Finished Product Inspection, Response time ≤4h, On-time delivery 93.1%, and Full Customization.

Elaboration:
The supplier has several important platform trust indicators, including Trade Assurance and verification. The Finished Product Inspection tag adds a quality-related compliance signal, while the delivery and response tags support operational transparency. However, the Gold Supplier tenure is only 1 year, which means the supplier has limited long-term platform track record based on the provided data.

Scoring Rationale:
Core platform credibility indicators are present, including Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, verification, and inspection-related tags. The main limitation is the short Gold Supplier history, which reduces long-term credibility compared with suppliers with many years of platform activity. Compliance visibility is acceptable, but not yet mature enough for a top-tier score.

Final Score: 16/20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
The supplier reports 300+ orders and CN¥338K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a store rating of 4.5 and 40+ reviews.

Elaboration:
The order volume indicates active marketplace demand and commercial validation. A six-month transaction value of CN¥338K+ suggests stable but not exceptionally high platform sales. The 4.5 store rating is positive, while 40+ reviews provide some customer feedback base, though the review volume is not large enough to fully validate consistency across a broad buyer population.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows real recent transaction activity, a meaningful order count, and a generally favorable store rating. However, transaction value and review count remain moderate rather than high-volume. This supports a stable mid-level business performance score rather than a top score reserved for suppliers with higher transaction scale, larger review bases, and stronger rating depth.

Final Score: 16/20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
The supplier’s response time is listed as ≤4h, and the platform tag confirms Full Customization.

Elaboration:
A response time within four hours is commercially acceptable for B2B sourcing and indicates reasonable communication efficiency. Full Customization suggests the supplier can support buyer-specific product requirements, which is important in eyewear sourcing where frame design, color, lens type, branding, and packaging may require customization. However, the data does not confirm response within one hour, dedicated account service, design support depth, or sampling lead time.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has solid service capability due to acceptable response speed and confirmed customization support. Since the response time is ≤4h rather than ≤1h, it does not meet the highest service benchmark. The absence of more detailed service process information also prevents a maximum score.

Final Score: 8/10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 93.1%.

Elaboration:
A 93.1% on-time delivery rate is above the 90% threshold and indicates reliable fulfillment performance based on the provided platform data. This is particularly relevant for buyers managing online retail inventory, seasonal eyewear collections, or repeat small-batch replenishment. No additional data is provided on average lead time, shipping methods, or delay causes.

Scoring Rationale:
The delivery metric meets the high-performance range, as it exceeds 90%. While the score is strong, it is not a perfect 10 because the data only provides the percentage and does not include supporting details such as lead-time consistency, peak-season performance, or logistics history.

Final Score: 9/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
The supplier has a 4.5 store rating, 40+ reviews, Finished Product Inspection, and verified supplier status.

Elaboration:
The 4.5 rating suggests generally positive customer feedback, while 40+ reviews provide a limited but useful review base. Finished Product Inspection is an important quality control indicator, especially for eyewear products where frame finishing, lens condition, hinge quality, and packaging consistency can affect buyer satisfaction. Verified supplier status also supports baseline supplier credibility. However, no specific product certifications, eyewear safety standards, defect rate data, inspection reports, or customer complaint details are provided.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a reasonable quality assurance foundation through Finished Product Inspection and verified status, supported by a positive store rating. The review count is moderate, not extensive, and there is insufficient data on formal product certifications or detailed QC performance. Therefore, quality confidence is good but not at the highest level.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score

Company Strength: 14/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 16/20
Business Performance: 16/20
Service Capability: 8/10
Delivery Performance: 9/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 16/20

Total Score: 79/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scaling. This supplier is best suited for small-to-medium buyers, online eyewear retailers, boutique distributors, and sourcing teams looking for flexible MOQ eyewear products with platform-backed transaction protection.

Main strengths include verified supplier status, Trade Assurance, Full Customization, Finished Product Inspection, 300+ recent orders, and a strong 93.1% on-time delivery rate. The supplier also offers relatively flexible MOQ options across listed eyewear products.

Main risks include the short 1-year Gold Supplier history, limited staff size of 20+ employees, moderate review count of 40+, and insufficient data on production capacity, product certifications, detailed QC reports, and factory audit scope.

Growth potential is moderate to positive. If the supplier maintains delivery performance, increases review volume, and provides clearer factory capacity and certification documentation, it could become a stronger long-term eyewear sourcing partner. For initial procurement, buyers should start with sample validation and small-to-medium trial orders before committing to larger volume programs.