Yushen(Tangshan)Water Saving And Technology Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Yushen(tangshan)water Saving And Technology Group Co., Ltd. is a China-based irrigation-related supplier located in Hebei, with reported factory scale of 13,000+ sqm and 200+ staff. The company presents a relatively solid manufacturing profile for drip irrigation and water-saving irrigation products, supported by factory verification status, 14 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and platform labels including project solutions, warranty availability, on-site installation, and finished product inspection. Its recent business performance shows 50+ orders and CN¥9.4M+ transaction value over the past six months, indicating meaningful commercial activity. However, the supplier has only 2 customer reviews despite a 5.0 store rating, which limits the depth of independent buyer feedback. Service responsiveness is acceptable at ≤4h, but customization capability is not provided. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established irrigation product supply with platform-backed transaction protection, while requiring additional due diligence on quality consistency, customization capability, and reference orders before large-scale procurement.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis:
The supplier reports a factory area of 13,000+ sqm, 200+ staff, and verified supplier/factory status. The company is located in Hebei, China.
Elaboration:
The reported factory size and employee base indicate a medium-scale production operation rather than a small trading-only setup. A 13,000+ sqm facility provides a reasonable physical manufacturing base for irrigation-related products, while 200+ staff suggests the company has operational capacity to support production, order handling, and basic internal management. The verified supplier status further strengthens the credibility of the company profile, although no additional factory audit report details, production line count, equipment list, or annual capacity figures are provided.
Scoring Rationale:
The company fits the “medium stable factory” category based on its factory area, staff count, and verification status. It does not reach the highest score range because the data does not include detailed production capacity, factory certification scope, equipment information, or audited manufacturing output. However, the available information is sufficient to support a solid company-strength assessment.
Final Score: 16/20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis:
The supplier is listed as an Gold Supplier for 14 years, supports Trade Assurance, and has verification-related information. Platform labels include “Project solutions,” “Warranty available,” “On-site installation,” and “Finished product inspection.”
Elaboration:
A 14-year Gold Supplier history is a strong platform credibility signal, especially when combined with Trade Assurance, which gives buyers a structured transaction protection mechanism. The presence of verification status and multiple platform service/quality labels improves the supplier’s compliance profile. Finished product inspection is particularly relevant because it indicates some level of quality control recognition on the platform. However, no specific third-party certifications, such as ISO or product compliance certificates, are provided in the supplied data.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates a strong platform-backed credibility profile due to long Gold Supplier tenure, Trade Assurance support, and verification indicators. The score is high, but not perfect, because the provided data does not include detailed formal certification documents or certification validity information beyond platform-level tags.
Final Score: 19/20
3. Business Performance
Basis:
Over the past six months, the supplier recorded 50+ orders and CN¥9.4M+ in transaction value. The store rating is 5.0, with 2 reviews.
Elaboration:
The six-month transaction value of CN¥9.4M+ is a strong commercial signal and suggests that the supplier has handled relatively meaningful order volume. The 50+ order count shows active recent business performance rather than a dormant platform presence. The 5.0 rating is positive, but the review count is very limited, which reduces the reliability of the rating as a broad customer satisfaction indicator.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows strong transaction value and acceptable recent order activity, supporting a relatively high business-performance score. However, the very small number of reviews prevents the rating from being considered fully validated by a broad customer base. For that reason, the score is below the top range despite the high transaction value.
Final Score: 17/20
4. Service Capability
Basis:
The reported communication response time is ≤4h. No data is provided regarding Full Customization capability.
Elaboration:
A response time within four hours is acceptable for international B2B communication and suggests the supplier is reasonably responsive during inquiry or order negotiation stages. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports full customization, private labeling, customized specifications, engineering adaptation, or packaging customization. The available platform labels include project solutions and on-site installation, but these do not directly confirm full customization capability.
Scoring Rationale:
The response speed supports a moderate service-capability score. Since the response time is not ≤1h and Full Customization information is insufficient, the supplier cannot be rated in the highest service range. The score reflects adequate communication capability but incomplete evidence on customization strength.
Final Score: 7/10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis:
The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is 91.7%.
Elaboration:
A 91.7% on-time delivery rate is above the 90% threshold and indicates generally reliable delivery execution based on the provided platform metric. This is important for irrigation products, where seasonal agricultural usage can make delivery timing highly relevant. No additional data is provided on average lead time, logistics methods, export experience, or delay dispute history.
Scoring Rationale:
Based strictly on the stated scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. The supplier receives a high score, though not a perfect score, because supporting logistics details and lead-time consistency data are not provided.
Final Score: 9/10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis:
The supplier has a 5.0 store rating, 2 reviews, finished product inspection label, and verified supplier/factory-related status.
Elaboration:
The 5.0 rating is favorable, and the finished product inspection label suggests that the supplier has some quality control process or platform-recognized inspection capability. Verified supplier/factory status also supports quality credibility at the company-profile level. However, the review count is only 2, which is too limited to strongly validate consistent customer satisfaction across multiple orders or markets. No detailed defect rate, inspection report, product certification, warranty claim data, or customer complaint history is provided.
Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has positive quality indicators, especially the 5.0 rating and finished product inspection label. However, limited review volume creates uncertainty around repeat quality consistency. The score is therefore placed in the good but not excellent range.
Final Score: 16/20
Total Score
Company Strength: 16/20
Platform & Compliance Credibility: 19/20
Business Performance: 17/20
Service Capability: 7/10
Delivery Performance: 9/10
Quality & Customer Feedback: 16/20
Total Score: 84/100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation Recommendation: Recommended with standard due diligence.
Yushen(tangshan)water Saving And Technology Group Co., Ltd. appears to be a relatively strong supplier for drip irrigation and water-saving irrigation products, especially for buyers who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance protection, verified supplier status, and recent transaction performance. The supplier is suitable for agricultural irrigation distributors, project-based buyers, and procurement teams seeking medium-scale supply capability with relatively strong platform backing.
Main risk points include the very limited number of customer reviews, insufficient data on Full Customization capability, and lack of detailed product certification or factory audit documentation in the provided information. Before placing large-volume or project-critical orders, buyers should request product specifications, inspection reports, customization confirmation, production lead time, warranty terms, and sample validation.
Growth potential is positive based on the supplier’s 14-year Gold Supplier history, CN¥9.4M+ six-month transaction value, verified status, and finished product inspection label. If additional quality documentation and stronger customer feedback are confirmed, the supplier could be considered for larger or longer-term procurement cooperation.
Leave your comment