Zhangzhou Lilliput Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Executive Summary
Zhangzhou Lilliput Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of 23,000+㎡ and 210+ staff. The company presents a relatively solid manufacturing base for camera-related products, including Full HD PTZ cameras, live stream cameras, optical zoom cameras, and 4K camera products. Its platform credibility is strong, supported by 22 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and listed capability tags such as finished product inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and minor customization. Business performance data shows 10+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ transaction value over the past six months, with a high store rating of 4.9 but only 4 reviews, indicating limited public customer feedback volume. The supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking verified camera suppliers with flexible low MOQ options, while larger-volume buyers should further validate production capacity, quality consistency, and commercial track record before scaling cooperation.
Detailed Analysis
1. Company Strength
Basis
- Factory location: Fujian, China
- Factory area: 23,000+㎡
- Employees: 210+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier reports a sizable physical manufacturing footprint and a workforce exceeding 210 staff. A 23,000+㎡ facility suggests the company has more than a small workshop-level setup and can support structured production, warehousing, or operational functions. The verified supplier status further strengthens confidence that the factory information has some platform-level validation.
Scoring Rationale
The company fits the profile of a medium-to-large stable factory rather than a small trading operation. The factory area and employee count are both meaningful indicators of production capacity. However, the provided data does not include annual output, production lines, equipment details, capacity utilization, or third-party factory audit reports beyond verified supplier status, so a full top-tier score is not justified.
Final Score: 17/20
2. Platform & Compliance Credibility
Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 22 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: Finished product inspection, Warranty available, ODM service available, Minor customization
Elaboration
The supplier has a long Gold Supplier history of 22 years, which is a strong platform credibility signal. Trade Assurance availability also provides transactional protection for buyers. The presence of finished product inspection, warranty availability, ODM service, and customization-related tags indicates that the supplier presents a relatively complete platform profile.
Scoring Rationale
A 22-year Gold Supplier record combined with Trade Assurance and supplier verification provides strong credibility. The listed tags also cover quality inspection and service capability. However, the data does not provide internationally recognized certifications, detailed audit documents, or specific compliance certificates, so the score remains slightly below the maximum.
Final Score: 19/20
3. Business Performance
Basis
- Orders in past six months: 10+
- Transaction value in past six months: CN¥135.2K+
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 4
Elaboration
The supplier has recorded some recent transaction activity, with 10+ orders and CN¥135.2K+ in transaction value over six months. The store rating of 4.9 is high, indicating positive buyer satisfaction among recorded reviews. However, the review base is very small, with only 4 reviews, limiting the reliability of the rating as a broad performance indicator.
Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates real commercial activity, but the order volume and transaction amount are relatively modest compared with suppliers showing high-volume platform sales. The high rating is positive, yet the low review count prevents strong validation of repeat customer satisfaction or broad market acceptance. This supports a mid-range score rather than a high-performance rating.
Final Score: 13/20
4. Service Capability
Basis
- Response time: ≤2h
- Customization-related tags: ODM service available, Minor customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data
Elaboration
The supplier’s response time of within two hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it does not meet the strongest benchmark of one hour or less. The platform tags show ODM service and minor customization availability, suggesting the supplier can support some degree of product adaptation or development support. However, no explicit Full Customization capability is provided.
Scoring Rationale
The supplier has a reasonable service foundation due to timely response and stated ODM/minor customization capability. Because the response time is not within one hour and Full Customization is not confirmed, the supplier should not receive a top service score. The available data supports a solid but not exceptional service capability rating.
Final Score: 7/10
5. Delivery Performance
Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%
Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest available delivery performance indicator in the provided data. This suggests that recent platform-tracked shipments have been fulfilled on schedule.
Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. A 100.0% rate supports the maximum score. However, the underlying shipment count is not provided, so while the score can be high based on the stated metric, buyers should still confirm delivery performance for larger or repeat orders.
Final Score: 10/10
6. Quality & Customer Feedback
Basis
- Store rating: 4.9
- Number of reviews: 4
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True
Elaboration
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.9 and lists finished product inspection as a quality-related capability. Verified supplier status also supports a basic level of supplier credibility. However, the customer feedback base is limited, with only 4 reviews, making it difficult to assess consistency across a broader buyer group.
Scoring Rationale
The quality-related platform signals are positive, especially the finished product inspection tag and high rating. Nevertheless, the small review count weakens the evidence for sustained customer satisfaction. Since the data does not include defect rates, inspection reports, quality certifications, return rates, or detailed buyer feedback, the score should remain in the good-but-not-excellent range.
Final Score: 15/20
Total Score: 81/100
Procurement Recommendation
Cooperation is recommended with controlled order scaling. Zhangzhou Lilliput Electronic Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking camera products with low MOQ flexibility, verified supplier background, Trade Assurance support, and available ODM or minor customization capability. The supplier is especially appropriate for trial orders, small-to-medium batch procurement, and buyers prioritizing platform credibility and delivery reliability.
Key risks include limited recent transaction volume, only 4 customer reviews, and insufficient data on detailed production capacity, international certifications, quality inspection documentation, and Full Customization capability. Growth potential is positive due to its sizable factory base, 22-year Gold Supplier history, verified profile, and complete platform transaction safeguards, but larger-volume buyers should request factory audit materials, sample testing, quality control records, and production capacity confirmation before committing to high-value orders.
Leave your comment