Zhejiang Lebao Plastics Equipment Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Lebao Plastics Equipment Factory is a China-based supplier located in Zhejiang, focused on PET bottles, PET preforms, and related plastic caps. Based on the provided data, the company shows a moderate production foundation, with an 11,000+ m² factory area, 60+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its product range is clearly concentrated in PET packaging components, with relatively accessible MOQs of 1,000–2,000 pieces depending on product type. The supplier has strong platform longevity as a 21-year Gold Supplier and lists relevant capability tags including finished product inspection, ODM service, full customization, and minor customization. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business performance indicators such as six-month order volume, transaction value, store rating, and customer reviews are largely unavailable or weak. This supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking PET packaging products with customization needs, but commercial validation and customer feedback data are insufficient for high-confidence procurement decisions.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 11,000+ m²
- Employees: 60+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Zhejiang, China
- Product scope includes PET bottles, PET preforms, and caps

Elaboration
The supplier has a clearly stated physical production base and a defined workforce size. An 11,000+ m² facility indicates a meaningful manufacturing footprint, while 60+ staff suggests a small-to-medium operational scale rather than a large industrial group. The verified supplier status provides additional confidence that the company has undergone some level of supplier verification. The product information also shows a focused PET packaging portfolio, which supports specialization rather than a highly fragmented product mix.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates a stable production foundation, but the employee count remains moderate and there is no detailed data on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery quantity, factory audit reports, or export scale. The verified supplier status strengthens credibility, but available data does not support classification as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer. Therefore, the company fits best within the medium stable factory range.

Final Score
15 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 21 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry tags: Finished product inspection, ODM service available, Full customization, Minor customization
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a very long Gold Supplier history of 21 years, which is a strong platform credibility indicator. The presence of supplier verification and listed service/inspection tags further supports basic compliance visibility. However, the absence of Trade Assurance is a notable limitation because it reduces platform-backed transaction protection for buyers.

Scoring Rationale
The 21-year Gold Supplier history is a strong positive factor and indicates long-term platform presence. Verified supplier status and certification tags also support credibility. However, the lack of Trade Assurance prevents the supplier from reaching the highest scoring band, as the platform compliance structure is not fully complete from a buyer protection perspective.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The available business performance data is highly limited. There is no reported recent order volume, no transaction value, and no store rating. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base to validate recent commercial activity or buyer satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Because the most important indicators for this dimension are missing, the supplier cannot be confirmed as having stable recent transaction performance. The absence of reviews and missing sales metrics significantly weakens commercial validation. Although this does not prove poor performance, the scoring must reflect the lack of verifiable business evidence.

Final Score
7 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤10h
- Full customization: Listed
- Minor customization: Listed
- ODM service available: Listed

Elaboration
The supplier provides several customization-related capability tags, including full customization, minor customization, and ODM service availability. This suggests that the supplier can support customized PET packaging requirements. However, the response time of ≤10 hours is acceptable but not fast enough to qualify as top-tier service responsiveness.

Scoring Rationale
Customization capability is a clear strength based on the listed tags. However, the response time is not within the ≤1 hour benchmark required for the highest score band. The supplier appears suitable for buyers needing product adaptation, but communication speed should be considered moderate rather than highly responsive.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate. Based on the provided scoring standard, this exceeds the 90% threshold required for the highest delivery performance band.

Scoring Rationale
The reported on-time delivery performance is excellent and supports confidence in delivery reliability. However, no supporting data is provided regarding shipment volume, number of orders measured, or time period beyond the stated metric. Since the given value is 100.0%, the supplier qualifies for the top score range for this dimension.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier: True
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier lists finished product inspection, which is a positive quality-control indicator. Verified supplier status also adds some confidence regarding supplier legitimacy. However, there is no store rating and no customer review base. This means buyer-side quality confirmation is unavailable from the provided data.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has basic quality assurance signals through finished product inspection and verification, but customer feedback is insufficient. The absence of reviews and rating prevents a higher score because actual buyer satisfaction and quality consistency cannot be validated. The supplier has some quality framework indicators, but not enough market feedback evidence.

Final Score
13 / 20

Total Score

68 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is conditionally recommended. Zhejiang Lebao Plastics Equipment Factory may be suitable for buyers seeking PET bottles, PET preforms, and caps with customization requirements, especially where moderate factory scale and long platform history are acceptable. The main risks are the absence of Trade Assurance, missing recent transaction data, no store rating, and 0 customer reviews. Buyers should request samples, confirm quality inspection procedures, verify production capacity, and clarify payment protection terms before placing bulk orders. Growth potential exists due to its focused PET packaging product range, 21-year Gold Supplier status, customization capability, and reported 100% on-time delivery rate.