Zhejiang Huangyan Jiangnan Mould Factory Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Huangyan Jiangnan Mould Factory is a China-based plastic mold supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 3,000+ square meters and 40+ staff. Its listed products focus on plastic molds for paint buckets, terminals, hangers, and thin-wall injection molding, with low minimum order quantities of 1 set, suggesting suitability for project-based mold procurement and customized mold sourcing. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, including 18 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Commercial performance is moderate: the past six months show 10 orders and CN¥3.4M+ transaction value, indicating meaningful transaction volume, though the review base is limited at only 3 reviews. Service and delivery indicators are acceptable, with response time within 6 hours and 100.0% on-time delivery. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking experienced mold manufacturing partners, especially for small-to-medium customized mold projects, while quality validation should be strengthened before large-scale cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory area: 3,000+ ㎡
- Employees: 40+ staff
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Product scope: plastic molds for buckets, terminals, hangers, and thin-wall injection molding

Elaboration
The supplier has a defined physical manufacturing base and a modest workforce, indicating basic in-house production capacity. A factory size of 3,000+ ㎡ and 40+ employees positions the company as a small-to-medium manufacturing operation rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The presence of verified supplier status improves confidence that the company has undergone some form of platform or supplier verification. The product listings also show specialization in plastic mold manufacturing, especially customized mold-related products.

Scoring Rationale
The company demonstrates real production capability and supplier verification, which supports a stable baseline for procurement consideration. However, the factory size and employee count do not indicate a large-scale supply chain operation. There is also no provided data on annual output capacity, production lines, machinery quantity, engineering team size, or factory certifications beyond verified supplier status. Therefore, the supplier fits best within the “small-to-medium factory with basic production capability” range.

Final Score
13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 18 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry tags: “Response time ≤6h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified/audited supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a long-standing platform presence, with 18 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a strong credibility signal because it indicates long-term platform continuity. Trade Assurance support also provides buyers with an additional transaction protection mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens platform-level confidence. However, the provided certification or industry tags mainly relate to response time and delivery performance, rather than internationally recognized quality or factory management certifications.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier has strong platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier status. These indicators support a high score in platform and compliance credibility. The score is not a full 20 because the available data does not include detailed factory audit reports, ISO certifications, product compliance certifications, or complete certification documentation.

Final Score
19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past 6 months: 10
- Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥3.4M+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3

Elaboration
The supplier has recorded 10 orders in the past six months, which indicates active commercial transactions but not high order frequency. The transaction value of CN¥3.4M+ is relatively meaningful and may reflect the high unit value of mold products. The store rating is excellent at 5.0, but the number of reviews is very limited, with only 3 reviews available. This means the rating is positive but based on a small feedback sample.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier demonstrates moderate business validation. The transaction amount is a positive indicator, especially for mold products with higher unit values, but the order count is not high. The 5.0 rating supports buyer satisfaction, yet the low review count limits the statistical reliability of the rating. As a result, the supplier is assessed as having stable but not high-volume commercial performance.

Final Score
15 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤6h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier’s response time is listed as within 6 hours, which indicates acceptable communication efficiency for B2B sourcing. Since mold procurement often requires technical discussion, drawing confirmation, sample approval, and engineering coordination, responsiveness is important. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm Full Customization support, engineering design service, sample development process, or technical support workflow.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is reasonable but does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. The product listings include customized mold-related wording, but the dataset does not explicitly state Full Customization capability, so this cannot be fully credited. The supplier therefore receives a mid-range service score based on acceptable response performance but incomplete customization data.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. For mold sourcing, delivery reliability is critical because delays can affect tooling validation, production ramp-up, and downstream manufacturing schedules. The available delivery metric is therefore a meaningful positive signal.

Scoring Rationale
According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, it receives the maximum score for this dimension. No deduction is applied, although the dataset does not provide the number of shipments behind this percentage.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 3
- Verified/audited supplier: True
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification: Verified/audited supplier marked as True, but detailed factory verification scope is Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a perfect store rating of 5.0, which is positive, but the rating is supported by only 3 reviews. This limits confidence in the breadth and consistency of customer feedback. Verified supplier status provides some quality-related credibility, but the data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, detailed factory audit scope, quality control procedures, inspection equipment, defect rates, or third-party certification.

Scoring Rationale
The supplier shows positive customer feedback and some verification support, but the review quantity is too small to support a high-confidence quality conclusion. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection data also limits the assessment of its quality assurance system. Therefore, the supplier is rated as having good initial quality signals but incomplete quality validation.

Final Score
14 / 20

Total Score

78 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Zhejiang Huangyan Jiangnan Mould Factory is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers seeking plastic mold suppliers for project-based sourcing, low-MOQ mold procurement, or customized mold development where platform credibility and delivery reliability are important.

The supplier is most suitable for: - Small-to-medium buyers sourcing plastic molds by project - Buyers requiring low MOQ of 1 set - Customers prioritizing platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status - Mold buyers comfortable performing additional technical and quality due diligence before order confirmation

Main risks: - Limited review base, with only 3 reviews supporting the 5.0 rating - No confirmed Finished Product Inspection data - No provided details on quality certifications, factory audit scope, production equipment, or annual capacity - Service capability is acceptable, but Full Customization support is Insufficient Data

Growth potential appears positive based on 18 years of Gold Supplier history, CN¥3.4M+ recent transaction value, and 100.0% on-time delivery. However, for large or technically critical mold projects, buyers should request factory audit details, mold case studies, QC process documentation, inspection reports, and production capacity evidence before placing substantial orders.