Zhejiang Sinofluoro Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

ZHEJIANG SINOFLUORO TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. is a China-based refrigerant gas supplier located in Zhejiang, with a reported factory area of 42,000+㎡ and 80+ staff. The company lists multiple refrigerant products, including R410A and R134A formats, with MOQ levels ranging from 300 cartons/cases to 6,000 pieces, indicating orientation toward bulk or industrial procurement rather than small trial purchasing. Its platform credibility is supported by 6 years as an Gold Supplier, supplier verification, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service availability, and warranty-related labeling. However, Trade Assurance is not supported, and key business validation data is missing, including six-month order volume, six-month transaction value, shop rating, and customer review evidence. Delivery performance is strong based on the stated 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking refrigerant products with factory-backed production and customization capability, but procurement should proceed with additional verification due to limited transaction and customer feedback data.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Zhejiang, China
- Factory area: 42,000+㎡
- Employees: 80+ staff
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier reports a relatively large factory area, which suggests a physical production or operational base capable of handling industrial-scale refrigerant-related supply. The employee count of 80+ staff indicates a moderate workforce rather than a very large labor organization. The verified supplier status provides an additional platform-backed indication that the company has undergone some form of supplier verification.

Scoring Rationale
The 42,000+㎡ factory area is a strong indicator of production or storage capacity, while the 80+ staff count places the company closer to a medium-sized operation than a large-scale integrated manufacturer. The verified supplier status strengthens confidence in company existence and operational legitimacy. However, no detailed production line capacity, annual output, machinery list, or factory certification data is provided, preventing a higher score.

Final Score
16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 6 years
- Trade Assurance: False
- Certification / industry labels: Warranty available, Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has maintained Gold Supplier status for 6 years, which provides a meaningful platform history. Supplier verification and Finished Product Inspection labeling add credibility from a compliance and quality-check perspective. The presence of Full Customization and ODM service labels also supports supplier capability positioning. However, the lack of Trade Assurance reduces buyer protection and weakens platform-backed transaction security.

Scoring Rationale
A 6-year Gold Supplier history and verified supplier status indicate above-basic platform credibility. The certification and service labels are relatively complete for procurement screening purposes. Nevertheless, Trade Assurance is explicitly marked as False, which is a material limitation for buyers who rely on platform payment protection, dispute support, and transaction safeguards.

Final Score
16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Past 6-month order volume: Insufficient Data
- Past 6-month transaction amount: Insufficient Data
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0

Elaboration
The available business performance data is very limited. No recent order quantity, recent transaction value, or store rating is provided. The review count is listed as 0, meaning there is no visible customer feedback base in the provided dataset to validate buyer satisfaction, transaction frequency, or repeat purchase behavior.

Scoring Rationale
Because order volume, transaction amount, and store rating are missing, commercial performance cannot be meaningfully confirmed. The review count of 0 further limits market validation. Although the company may have operational capability based on factory and platform data, the absence of transaction evidence creates a significant procurement evaluation gap.

Final Score
6 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization: Available
- ODM service: Available

Elaboration
The supplier reports a response time of no more than 5 hours, which is acceptable for normal B2B communication but does not meet the strongest service benchmark of response within 1 hour. Full Customization and ODM service availability indicate that the supplier can potentially support buyer-specific requirements, product adaptation, or branded procurement needs.

Scoring Rationale
The response time is reasonable but not top-tier. Customization capability is clearly supported by the listed platform labels, which strengthens service flexibility. However, no data is provided on quotation speed, sample support, engineering communication, after-sales response, or dedicated account management, so the score remains in the normal-to-good range.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time shipment rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time shipment rate. Based on the provided scoring framework, any on-time shipment rate above 90% qualifies for the highest delivery performance range.

Scoring Rationale
The stated delivery metric is excellent and directly supports a high score. However, the dataset does not include order volume behind this percentage, so while the rate itself is strong, the depth of delivery validation cannot be independently assessed from the provided information.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Number of reviews: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Available
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has Finished Product Inspection labeling and verified supplier status, both of which support a basic quality assurance framework. However, customer-side quality validation is weak because no store rating is provided and the review count is 0. This means there is no visible buyer feedback evidence to confirm product consistency, complaint handling, or long-term quality satisfaction.

Scoring Rationale
Finished Product Inspection and supplier verification justify a score above the lowest range, as some quality-related assurance mechanisms are present. However, the absence of rating data and customer reviews prevents the supplier from being assessed as having strong customer-validated quality performance. The quality system appears present, but customer feedback evidence is insufficient.

Final Score
12 / 20

Total Score

67 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation can be considered with caution. This supplier is most suitable for industrial or bulk refrigerant buyers seeking factory-backed supply, customization capability, ODM availability, and strong stated delivery performance. The main risks are the absence of Trade Assurance, missing recent transaction data, missing store rating, and 0 customer reviews. Before placing large orders, buyers should request business licenses, product compliance documents, batch quality records, inspection reports, export experience evidence, and sample or trial-order validation. Growth potential exists due to the large reported factory area, 6-year Gold Supplier history, verification status, Finished Product Inspection, customization capability, and 100.0% stated on-time shipment rate.