Chongqing Qiyi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Chongqing Qiyi Technology Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Chongqing, offering outboard motor parts and outboard motor-related products with low minimum order quantities ranging from 1 to 3 pieces. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-scale but commercially active supplier, with a reported factory area of 900+㎡ and 20+ staff. It is marked as a verified supplier and has platform credibility supported by 4 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance, Finished Product Inspection, ODM service availability, warranty availability, and full customization capability.

The supplier shows solid business validation, with 200+ orders and CN¥2.5M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. Its delivery performance is strong, with a 92.8% on-time dispatch rate. This supplier is suitable for buyers seeking flexible MOQ, replacement parts, small-batch sourcing, or customized outboard motor-related products, but its relatively small factory scale should be considered for large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory location: Chongqing, China
• Factory area: 900+㎡
• Employees: 20+ staff
• Verified supplier: True
• Product scope includes outboard motor parts and outboard motor-related products
• No additional factory audit reports, production line details, annual capacity, or formal factory certifications were provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a clearly stated physical factory presence with 900+㎡ of factory area and 20+ employees. This indicates that the company has a basic operational structure and some level of production or supply-handling capacity. The verified supplier status adds credibility to the existence and legitimacy of the company, but the provided scale is relatively small compared with larger industrial manufacturers.

The product listings show a range of outboard motor components and related motor products, which suggests a focused product category rather than a broad unrelated catalog. However, there is insufficient data on production equipment, monthly output, in-house manufacturing percentage, warehouse capacity, engineering staff, or quality laboratory capability. Therefore, the company cannot be classified as a large-scale stable supply chain based on the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size of 900+㎡ and 20+ staff places the supplier in the small factory category. The verified supplier status supports basic credibility and indicates that the company is not purely unverified on the platform. However, the absence of detailed production capacity, factory certifications, audit reports, or large-scale workforce data limits the score. The supplier demonstrates basic production or supply capability but does not provide enough evidence to qualify as a medium or large-scale factory.

Final Score

12 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verified supplier: True
• Certification / industry labels:
• Warranty available
• Finished product inspection
• ODM service available
• Full customization
• No ISO, CE, marine-specific, or other third-party product certifications were provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively complete platform credibility profile. Four years as a Gold Supplier indicates an established platform presence rather than a newly created supplier account. Trade Assurance provides transactional protection for buyers, while verified supplier status strengthens baseline trust. The presence of Finished Product Inspection and warranty availability further improves compliance confidence from a procurement perspective.

The platform labels also indicate ODM and full customization capability, which is useful for buyers requiring product adaptation or customized specifications. However, the data does not include internationally recognized product certifications, factory management certifications, or detailed compliance documents. Therefore, while the platform credibility is strong, broader compliance depth remains insufficiently documented.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets several important platform credibility indicators: Gold Supplier status, 4-year operating history on the platform, Trade Assurance, supplier verification, and multiple relevant service/quality labels. These are meaningful procurement trust signals. However, the Gold Supplier period is moderate rather than very long, and there is no provided evidence of external certifications beyond platform labels. This supports a high but not maximum score.

Final Score

17 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 200+
• Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥2.5M+
• Store rating: 4.7
• Review count: 100+

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates measurable commercial activity over the past six months. A transaction value of CN¥2.5M+ and 200+ orders indicate that the supplier has already been tested by multiple buyers on the platform. The order count is not merely symbolic; it suggests ongoing demand and operational ability to handle repeated transactions.

The 4.7 store rating is positive, though not perfect, and the 100+ review count provides a reasonable base for evaluating customer experience. The combination of order volume, transaction value, and customer feedback gives stronger commercial validation than suppliers with limited or no transaction history. However, the data does not provide order distribution by product category, repeat buyer ratio, dispute rate, or buyer geography, so deeper sales stability cannot be fully assessed.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows strong business performance for a small-scale company. The past six-month performance of 200+ orders and CN¥2.5M+ transaction value indicates active market acceptance. The 4.7 rating and 100+ reviews support a generally positive buyer experience. Since the rating is good but not exceptionally high and additional transaction quality indicators are not provided, the score is strong but not at the absolute maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤3 hours
• Full customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Warranty available
• No data provided on multilingual support, dedicated account management, quotation speed, technical support team, or after-sales response time

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time of ≤3 hours is acceptable for international B2B communication and indicates reasonable responsiveness. Full customization and ODM service availability are positive service indicators, especially for buyers requiring product adaptation, branding, or specification adjustments. Warranty availability also suggests a basic after-sales service framework.

However, the response time does not meet the strongest benchmark of ≤1 hour. Additionally, the provided data does not include evidence of technical engineering support, sample development timelines, dedicated sales team structure, or after-sales case handling performance. Therefore, the service capability appears practical and commercially usable, but not clearly top-tier.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier has good service capability due to customization support, ODM availability, warranty availability, and a response time within three hours. This is suitable for normal procurement communication and customized sourcing projects. However, because the response time is above one hour and detailed service infrastructure is not provided, the supplier should be scored in the upper-middle range rather than the highest range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 92.8%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time dispatch rate of 92.8% is a strong delivery indicator. According to the scoring standard, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% falls into the 9–10 point range. This suggests that the supplier generally maintains reliable dispatch discipline and can meet agreed shipment schedules for most orders.

However, the data does not specify average lead time, logistics methods, delay reasons, peak-season performance, or performance by product category. Therefore, while the dispatch rate is clearly positive, the delivery evaluation is based only on the provided on-time dispatch percentage.

Scoring Rationale

A 92.8% on-time dispatch rate exceeds the 90% threshold and supports a high delivery score. It demonstrates that the supplier has a reliable fulfillment record on the platform. Since the rate is strong but not close to 100%, and no additional lead-time or logistics performance data is provided, a score of 9 is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Store rating: 4.7
• Review count: 100+
• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Verified supplier: True
• Warranty available
• No detailed defect rate, inspection reports, return rate, claim rate, or third-party quality certification data provided

Elaboration

The supplier has a favorable quality feedback profile based on a 4.7 store rating and 100+ reviews. The review volume is sufficient to provide a more reliable signal than suppliers with only a few comments. Finished Product Inspection is also a meaningful quality assurance indicator, showing that the supplier has at least a stated final inspection process before shipment.

Verified supplier status further improves confidence in the supplier’s operational legitimacy. Warranty availability also supports buyer protection after purchase. However, the data does not include detailed quality records such as defect rates, batch inspection standards, product test reports, marine-specific compliance documents, or formal third-party certifications. As a result, quality confidence is good but not fully comprehensive.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a high score because it combines a good rating, meaningful review count, Finished Product Inspection, warranty availability, and verified supplier status. These indicators suggest a generally reliable quality framework and positive customer experience. Nevertheless, the absence of detailed quality documentation and formal third-party certification prevents a maximum score.

Final Score

18 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for conditional cooperation.

Chongqing Qiyi Technology Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking small-batch procurement, replacement outboard motor parts, flexible MOQ purchasing, ODM service, or customized outboard motor-related products. Its strongest advantages are active platform transaction performance, 4-year Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, 92.8% on-time dispatch rate, Finished Product Inspection, and a positive 4.7 store rating with 100+ reviews.

The main procurement risk is its relatively small operating scale, with only 900+㎡ factory area and 20+ staff. This may limit suitability for large-volume, long-term, or highly time-sensitive supply programs unless capacity is further verified. Additional missing data includes production capacity, factory audit details, product certifications, defect rate, inspection reports, and after-sales performance records.

For initial cooperation, buyers should consider trial orders, sample verification, Trade Assurance usage, and clear written specifications before scaling order volume. The supplier shows good growth potential if it can provide more transparent factory capacity data, quality documentation, and formal certification records.