Dayang Parking Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Dayang Parking Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Shandong, positioned in the mechanical and smart parking equipment segment. The provided product portfolio includes rotary parking towers, vertical automatic parking systems, car elevator systems, outdoor steel parking lifts, and smart automatic parking systems, with minimum order quantities ranging from 1 unit to 5 units. The company shows strong physical production indicators, including a reported factory area of 72,000+ sqm, 320+ staff, and verified supplier status. Its platform credibility is also strong, supported by 12 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and a 100.0% on-time delivery tag. However, commercial validation is limited: only 2 orders and CN¥27K+ transaction value in the past six months, with no store rating and 0 reviews provided. This supplier appears more suitable for buyers who prioritize manufacturing scale, platform credibility, and project-based parking equipment sourcing, while requiring additional due diligence on quality records, customer references, and after-sales capability before large-volume procurement.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis
- Factory location: Shandong, China
- Factory area: 72,000+ sqm
- Employees: 320+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Product scope includes smart parking towers, automatic parking systems, car elevators, and parking lifts

Elaboration
The supplier demonstrates a substantial physical manufacturing base based on the reported factory area and workforce size. A 72,000+ sqm facility and 320+ staff suggest that the company is not a small trading operation and has a meaningful production organization behind its parking equipment offerings. The product range also indicates involvement in relatively complex mechanical parking systems rather than simple commodity products.

Scoring Rationale
The company fits the upper range of the Company Strength category because both factory scale and employee count are strong, and verified supplier status adds credibility to its operating foundation. However, the data does not provide details on annual production capacity, production lines, machinery, or specific factory certifications beyond verified supplier status, so the score should not reach the maximum.

Final Score
18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry tags: “Response time ≤4h”, “On-time delivery 100.0%”
- Verified supplier: True

Elaboration
The supplier has a long platform history, with 12 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance availability is an important procurement safeguard because it provides a platform-backed transaction mechanism. The verified supplier status further supports platform credibility. The listed tags also show operational indicators related to response and delivery performance.

Scoring Rationale
A 12-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status represent a strong platform credibility profile. The supplier meets the core indicators for a reliable -based sourcing candidate. The only limitation is that the provided data does not include detailed third-party audit reports, factory certificate names, or broader compliance documentation, so the score remains slightly below perfect.

Final Score
18 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis
- Orders in the past six months: 2
- Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥27K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0

Elaboration
The supplier’s recent platform transaction performance is limited based on the provided data. Two orders over six months and CN¥27K+ transaction value indicate some commercial activity, but the volume is low. The absence of a store rating and the presence of 0 reviews reduce the ability to validate buyer satisfaction or repeat purchasing behavior through platform records.

Scoring Rationale
Although the supplier has recorded recent transactions, the order count and transaction value are both relatively low. More importantly, there is no store rating and no customer review base, which limits commercial proof from the platform. This creates a gap between the company’s apparent manufacturing scale and its visible recent online business performance.

Final Score
8 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data
- Communication efficiency beyond response tag: Insufficient Data

Elaboration
The supplier has a stated response time of within four hours, which indicates acceptable responsiveness for initial communication. However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization, design adaptation, engineering customization, OEM/ODM services, or dedicated project communication processes.

Scoring Rationale
A response time of ≤4h is reasonable but does not meet the highest service benchmark of ≤1 hour. Since there is no data confirming Full Customization or advanced communication capabilities, the supplier should be scored as having basic to moderate service capability rather than strong service capability.

Final Score
7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery performance is excellent based on the provided data. A 100.0% on-time delivery rate meets the highest threshold in the scoring framework and suggests reliable fulfillment behavior for recorded platform transactions.

Scoring Rationale
Because the on-time delivery rate is above 90%, the supplier qualifies for the top scoring band in this dimension. However, this should be interpreted together with the low recent order count, since the 100.0% rate may be based on limited transaction volume.

Final Score
10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0
- Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
- Factory Verification / verified supplier status: True
- On-time delivery: 100.0%

Elaboration
The supplier has verified supplier status, which provides some quality-related credibility at the company verification level. However, the provided data does not include customer ratings, buyer reviews, finished product inspection records, product certifications, inspection procedures, defect rates, warranty terms, or after-sales performance.

Scoring Rationale
The lack of store rating and 0 reviews create a significant limitation in assessing real customer satisfaction. Factory verification is positive, but it does not replace buyer feedback or documented quality inspection systems. Because Finished Product Inspection information is not provided, the quality assurance picture remains incomplete.

Final Score
8 / 20

Total Score

Total Score: 69 / 100

• Company Strength: 18 / 20
• Platform & Compliance Credibility: 18 / 20
• Business Performance: 8 / 20
• Service Capability: 7 / 10
• Delivery Performance: 10 / 10
• Quality & Customer Feedback: 8 / 20

Procurement Recommendation

Dayang Parking Co., Ltd. can be considered a qualified potential supplier for project-based sourcing of smart parking systems, parking towers, car elevators, and parking lift equipment, especially for buyers who value factory scale, long platform presence, Trade Assurance, and verified supplier status.

The supplier is more suitable for professional buyers, engineering contractors, parking system integrators, and importers who can conduct technical due diligence before placing larger orders. It is less suitable for buyers who require strong platform-based customer feedback, high recent transaction volume, or extensive published quality inspection records.

Key risks include limited recent transaction volume, 0 reviews, missing store rating, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, customization capability, product certifications, and after-sales service. Its growth potential lies in its strong manufacturing base, long Gold Supplier history, and excellent reported delivery performance, but further verification is recommended before large-scale procurement.