Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. is a China-based supplier located in Liaoning, offering cable sleeve and tubing-related products such as PET wire loom cable sleeves, PVC heat shrink tubing, nylon woven sleeves, and braided cable management sleeves. Based on the provided data, the company appears to be a small-to-medium scale supplier with a factory area of 1,200+㎡ and 30+ staff, supported by supplier/factory verification. Its platform credibility is strong, with 14 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and a 99.6% on-time delivery indicator. Business performance is also solid, with 500+ orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.9 store rating and 50+ reviews. The supplier is most suitable for buyers seeking stable sourcing of cable protection and sleeve products with relatively low MOQ options. Key limitations include insufficient data on full customization capability and finished product inspection systems.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

• Company name: Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd.
• Country/region: China, Liaoning
• Factory area: 1,200+㎡
• Employees: 30+ staff
• Verified supplier/factory audit status: True

Elaboration

The supplier has a physical factory presence with a declared area of more than 1,200㎡ and a workforce of more than 30 employees. This indicates an established manufacturing setup, though the scale is not large compared with bigger industrial manufacturers. The company has supplier/factory verification, which improves confidence that its operational base has been checked through the platform or related verification process.

The product portfolio shown in the data focuses on cable protection and sleeve-related materials, including PET cable sleeves, PVC heat shrink tubing, nylon protective sleeves, and braided cable management sleeves. The listed MOQs, ranging from 10 meters to 200 meters, suggest the supplier can support relatively flexible small-batch procurement, but the provided data does not confirm high-volume production capacity beyond the transaction performance figures.

Scoring Rationale

The factory size and employee count indicate a small-to-medium manufacturer rather than a large-scale supply chain operation. The verified supplier/factory status is a positive factor and supports basic production credibility. However, the company does not show evidence of a large factory area, large workforce, or additional factory certifications in the provided data. Therefore, it fits best into the category of a smaller but operationally capable factory with verified manufacturing presence.

Final Score

13 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 14 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Verification status: Verified supplier/factory audit indicated as True
• Platform/industry labels: “On-time delivery 99.6%”, “Response time ≤2h”

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 14 years as a Gold Supplier. This is a meaningful credibility indicator because it shows long-term platform participation rather than a newly established online storefront. Trade Assurance support further improves buyer protection in transactions, especially for payment and order fulfillment security.

The supplier also displays operational performance labels, including 99.6% on-time delivery and response time within two hours. These platform indicators strengthen the supplier’s credibility from a procurement perspective. However, the data does not provide details on independent product certifications, industry compliance certificates, or specific quality management system certifications.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier performs strongly in platform credibility due to its long Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance availability, and verified supplier/factory status. A 14-year platform presence is a major positive factor. The only reason the score is not full is that the provided data does not include detailed third-party certifications, industry-specific compliance certificates, or complete certification documentation beyond platform-level credibility and operational labels.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

• Orders in the past six months: 500+
• Transaction value in the past six months: CN¥5.2M+
• Store rating: 4.9
• Number of reviews: 50+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 500 orders in the past six months indicates active buyer engagement and repeated transaction flow. The transaction amount of CN¥5.2M+ over the same period suggests that the supplier is not merely receiving small sample orders but has achieved meaningful commercial volume.

The store rating of 4.9 is high, and the presence of 50+ reviews provides some level of customer feedback validation. While the review count is not extremely large, it is sufficient to show that the supplier has public transaction feedback available. Together, the order volume, transaction value, and rating profile indicate strong business performance within the available dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier meets the characteristics of a high-performing platform seller: high order quantity, high recent transaction value, and strong store rating. The review count is moderate rather than very large, which slightly limits the depth of customer validation. However, the 500+ recent orders and CN¥5.2M+ transaction value strongly support a high score.

Final Score

19 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

• Communication response time: ≤2h
• Full customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s response time is listed as within two hours, which is a positive service indicator and suggests a relatively responsive sales or customer service team. Fast response time is valuable for buyers managing quotations, sample confirmation, order changes, and delivery coordination.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier supports Full Customization. There is no provided information on OEM, ODM, private labeling, custom packaging, engineering support, color customization, size customization, or design customization. Therefore, the assessment of customization capability must be limited.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates good communication responsiveness, but it does not meet the top service scoring condition of response time within one hour combined with strong customization capability. Since customization capability is not confirmed in the provided data, the score should remain in the normal service range rather than the highest tier.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

• On-time delivery rate: 99.6%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate is very strong at 99.6%. This significantly exceeds the 90% benchmark for the highest scoring range. From a procurement perspective, this suggests reliable fulfillment performance based on the provided platform data.

A high on-time delivery rate is particularly important for cable sleeve and tubing products because such materials may be used as components in downstream production, maintenance, assembly, or project-based procurement. Delivery reliability can directly affect the buyer’s own production or project timeline.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. At 99.6%, the supplier is near the top of the available delivery performance range. No negative delivery indicators are provided in the data.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

• Store rating: 4.9
• Reviews: 50+
• Verified supplier/factory audit status: True
• Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong store rating of 4.9, which indicates generally positive buyer feedback. The presence of 50+ reviews provides a visible feedback base, although it is not a very large review volume. The verified supplier/factory status adds additional confidence in the company’s operational legitimacy.

However, the data does not confirm whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection. There is also no information provided regarding ISO certification, quality management systems, product testing procedures, inspection reports, defect rates, or third-party quality audits. As a result, the quality assessment must rely mainly on store rating, review count, and verification status.

Scoring Rationale

The high store rating and verified supplier/factory status support a favorable quality and feedback evaluation. However, the review base is moderate, and the absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection or documented quality control systems prevents a top-tier score. The supplier appears to have good customer satisfaction indicators, but the formal quality assurance evidence is incomplete.

Final Score

16 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation, with controlled quality verification before large-volume purchasing.

Deem Electronic & Electric Material Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers seeking cable sleeve, braided sleeve, PET protective sleeve, nylon sleeve, and PVC heat shrink tubing products with flexible MOQ options and strong platform transaction credibility. The supplier is especially appropriate for small-to-medium procurement projects, repeat online sourcing, and buyers who value Trade Assurance, fast response, and strong on-time delivery performance.

The main strengths are its 14-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier/factory status, strong six-month transaction performance, high 4.9 store rating, and 99.6% on-time delivery rate. These factors indicate a commercially active and platform-credible supplier.

The main risks are limited factory scale, insufficient data on Full Customization capability, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection or formal quality control systems. For first-time cooperation, buyers should request samples, confirm specifications in writing, and clarify inspection standards before bulk orders.

Growth potential is moderate to strong if the supplier can provide clearer quality documentation, inspection processes, and customization capabilities.