Dehua Xingye Ceramics Science And Technology Co.,Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

DEHUA XINGYE CERAMICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD. is a China-based ceramics supplier located in Fujian, with a reported factory area of 60,000+ m² and 370+ staff. Based on the available data, the supplier shows relatively strong manufacturing scale and verified supplier status, making it suitable for buyers seeking ceramic decorative, seasonal, wedding gift, home decoration, and customized ceramic products with 500-piece MOQs. Its platform credibility is supported by 7 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, and labels including Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, and Finished product inspection. However, recent commercial performance appears moderate, with only 10+ orders and CN¥67.6K+ transaction value over the past six months, despite a 5.0 store rating. The limited review count of 6 means customer feedback depth is still relatively low. Overall, this supplier is suitable for small to mid-sized buyers requiring verified production capacity, stable delivery, and ceramic customization options, while larger buyers should further validate capacity, quality consistency, and order references before scaling cooperation.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — Final Score: 18/20

Basis:
- Factory area: 60,000+ m²
- Employees: 370+ staff
- Verified supplier: True
- Location: Fujian, China

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a sizeable physical production base and workforce. A factory area above 60,000 m² and more than 370 staff indicate a relatively mature manufacturing operation compared with small workshops or trading-only entities. The verified supplier status further supports the existence of a recognized supplier profile on the platform.

Scoring Rationale:
The company fits the profile of a large-scale and relatively stable production supplier. The combination of factory scale, employee count, and verified supplier status supports a high score. However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, annual capacity, equipment list, or factory audit documents beyond verified supplier status, so a perfect score is not justified.

Final Score: 18/20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — Final Score: 19/20

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 7 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification/industry labels: Low MOQ for customization, Warranty available, Finished product inspection

Elaboration:
The supplier has a relatively long Gold Supplier history of 7 years, which indicates sustained platform presence. Trade Assurance availability adds transaction protection for buyers. The listed labels also improve credibility, particularly Finished product inspection and Warranty available, as they relate to quality control and after-sales support.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has a strong platform credibility profile, combining long-term Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance, and multiple relevant platform labels. This supports a near-top score. The score is not 20 because no independent third-party certifications, factory audit reports, or specific compliance certificates were provided in the data.

Final Score: 19/20

3. Business Performance — Final Score: 13/20

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 10+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥67.6K+
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 6

Elaboration:
The supplier has recorded recent transactions, but the order volume and transaction amount are relatively limited. A 5.0 store rating is positive, but the review base of 6 is small, which limits the reliability of customer satisfaction conclusions. The data suggests verified but not high-volume recent commercial activity.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows active business performance, but current transaction evidence does not indicate high order volume or high transaction scale. The perfect 5.0 rating supports confidence, yet the low number of reviews prevents stronger validation. Therefore, the supplier is placed at the upper end of the low-to-moderate performance range.

Final Score: 13/20

4. Service Capability — Final Score: 7/10

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤4h
- Customization-related label: Low MOQ for customization
- Full Customization: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
A response time of within 4 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it is not at the strongest level of one hour or less. The Low MOQ for customization label suggests some customization support, but the data does not confirm Full Customization capability.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier demonstrates normal service responsiveness and some customization-related capability. However, because response time is not ≤1 hour and Full Customization is not explicitly provided, the score remains in the normal service capability range rather than the top tier.

Final Score: 7/10

5. Delivery Performance — Final Score: 10/10

Basis:
- On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported on-time delivery rate is 100.0%, which is the strongest delivery indicator available in the provided data. This directly suggests reliable shipment punctuality within the measured platform record.

Scoring Rationale:
According to the scoring rule, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier reaches 100.0%, it receives the full score for delivery performance. No deduction is applied because no negative delivery data was provided.

Final Score: 10/10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — Final Score: 16/20

Basis:
- Store rating: 5.0
- Number of reviews: 6
- Finished product inspection: Listed
- Factory Verification / verified supplier: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a perfect store rating and includes Finished product inspection among its platform labels, which supports basic quality assurance. Verified supplier status also provides some credibility regarding supplier identity and operations. However, the customer feedback sample is small, with only 6 reviews, limiting confidence in long-term quality consistency.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has strong quality indicators in rating and inspection label, but the limited review count prevents classification as having large-scale proven customer feedback. The score reflects a good quality-control foundation with moderate market validation.

Final Score: 16/20

Total Score: 83/100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, particularly for small to mid-sized buyers seeking ceramic decorative items, seasonal products, wedding gift storage items, home decoration ceramics, and customized ceramic products with 500-piece MOQs. The supplier’s key strengths are large factory scale, 7-year Gold Supplier history, Trade Assurance support, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and Finished product inspection label. Main risks include limited recent order volume, relatively low transaction value, and only 6 customer reviews, which reduce confidence in large-volume commercial validation. Growth potential appears positive based on factory scale, verified supplier status, customization-related labeling, and stable delivery performance, but buyers planning large or long-term procurement should request samples, confirm production capacity, and conduct additional quality checks before scaling orders.