zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Mooxon Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Executive Summary

Dongguan Mooxon Technology Co., Ltd. is a Guangdong, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 5,400+ m² and 80+ staff, indicating a small-to-medium manufacturing operation with established production capacity. The supplier is listed as a verified/audited supplier and operates as a 4-year Gold Supplier with Trade Assurance support, which provides a meaningful level of platform credibility. Its listed product scope is concentrated around outdoor kitchen units, retractable awnings, motorized waterproof roofs, and retractable roofing systems, with low MOQ options shown for several products.

Business performance is relatively strong, with 90+ orders and CN¥8.1M+ transaction value in the past six months, supported by a 5.0 store rating. However, the review base is limited at only 6 reviews, and there is insufficient data on full customization capability, finished product inspection, and detailed quality certifications. Overall, this supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking outdoor shading or roofing-related products with moderate supplier scale, strong recent transaction activity, and platform-backed trade protection.

Dongguan Mooxon Technology Co., Ltd.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 5,400+ m²
  • Employee count: 80+ staff
  • Verified/audited supplier status: True
  • Product scope includes outdoor kitchen units, retractable awnings, motorized waterproof roofs, and retractable roofing systems.

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a tangible manufacturing base with over 5,400 m² of factory space and more than 80 employees. This suggests a small-to-medium production organization rather than a large-scale industrial supplier. The presence of a verified/audited supplier status adds credibility to its operational setup, as it indicates that some form of supplier or factory verification has been completed on the platform.

The listed product range is focused around outdoor living and shading structures, which supports the impression of a specialized supplier rather than a broad trading company. However, the data does not provide information on production lines, monthly capacity, machinery, R&D team size, export volume, or factory certifications beyond the verified/audited supplier indication.

Scoring Rationale

A factory area of 5,400+ m² and 80+ staff supports a stable baseline manufacturing capability. This is stronger than a very small workshop-level supplier but does not reach the scale normally associated with large, highly diversified supply chains. The verified/audited supplier status improves confidence in the company’s physical and operational credibility. Due to the absence of detailed production capacity, equipment, and formal factory certification data, the company is best classified as a medium-sized stable supplier rather than a large-scale supply chain operator.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 4 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verification/audited supplier status: True
  • Certification/industry labels: “Project solutions”, “Warranty available”, “Low MOQ for customization”

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively solid platform profile. A 4-year Gold Supplier history indicates continued platform participation over multiple years, while Trade Assurance provides buyers with transaction protection mechanisms. The verified/audited supplier status further strengthens platform credibility.

The listed labels show commercially relevant capabilities, particularly project solutions, warranty availability, and low MOQ customization. However, these labels should not be interpreted as formal product certifications or compliance certificates. No ISO certification, CE certification, product safety certification, environmental certification, or third-party compliance certificate is provided in the data.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of Gold Supplier status, 4-year platform history, Trade Assurance, and verified/audited supplier status provides a credible platform-backed profile. However, the Gold Supplier duration is moderate rather than long-term, and the certification/industry labels are commercial service tags rather than complete compliance documentation. Because formal product or management system certifications are not provided, the supplier does not qualify for the highest credibility tier.

Final Score

16 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 90+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥8.1M+
  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 6

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity, with more than 90 orders and over CN¥8.1M in transaction value during the past six months. This indicates active buyer engagement and meaningful sales conversion on the platform. The 5.0 store rating is positive and suggests that available customer feedback is favorable.

However, the number of reviews is only 6, which limits the statistical reliability of the store rating. A perfect rating based on a small review base is positive but not as robust as a high rating supported by dozens or hundreds of reviews. The available data also does not disclose repeat customer rate, dispute rate, refund rate, buyer country distribution, or product-specific sales breakdown.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier’s transaction value and order count are strong indicators of recent business performance. CN¥8.1M+ in six months reflects commercially meaningful demand, and 90+ orders suggests more than occasional platform activity. The 5.0 rating further supports positive buyer experience, but the low number of reviews prevents assigning a top-tier score. The supplier performs above a mid-level benchmark but still has limited public feedback depth.

Final Score

17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤5h
  • Full Customization: Insufficient Data
  • Related platform label: “Low MOQ for customization”

Elaboration

The supplier’s stated response time of within 5 hours indicates acceptable communication efficiency, though it is not at the fastest service level. The platform label “Low MOQ for customization” suggests some customization-related commercial flexibility, especially for buyers requiring lower minimum order thresholds. However, the data does not confirm Full Customization capability.

There is also no information on dedicated account managers, engineering support, design support, sample lead time, after-sales process, or multilingual service capability. Therefore, service capability can be considered functional but not fully validated for complex custom projects.

Scoring Rationale

A response time of ≤5h is reasonable for normal sourcing communication, but it does not meet the strongest benchmark of response within one hour. The “Low MOQ for customization” label is a positive service indicator, yet it is not equivalent to confirmed Full Customization. Because customization depth is not sufficiently documented, the supplier should be scored as having standard-to-good service capability rather than advanced service capability.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time delivery rate, which is the strongest available delivery performance indicator in the provided data. This suggests that, based on platform-recorded or reported delivery performance, the supplier has fulfilled shipments within agreed timelines.

However, the data does not include total shipment count behind this rate, average lead time, peak-season delivery stability, logistics methods, or performance by product category. Therefore, while the on-time delivery rate is excellent, the depth of supporting delivery data is limited.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring criteria, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for the 9–10 point range. A 100.0% rate supports a high score. Because the data does not provide shipment volume or historical delivery consistency beyond the reported rate, a near-top score is appropriate rather than assuming flawless long-term logistics performance.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 5.0
  • Number of reviews: 6
  • Verified/audited supplier status: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data
  • Factory Verification: True / supplier verification indicated
  • Formal quality certifications: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a perfect 5.0 store rating, which is a positive quality and customer satisfaction signal. The verified/audited supplier status also provides some confidence that the supplier has undergone a platform-level verification process. These factors support a favorable quality profile at the supplier level.

However, the review base is very small, with only 6 reviews, so the reliability of customer feedback is limited. The provided data does not confirm Finished Product Inspection, product testing procedures, QC team structure, inspection reports, defect rate, warranty claim rate, or recognized quality management certifications. As a result, quality assurance capability cannot be considered fully proven from the available information.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier earns credit for its 5.0 rating and verified/audited supplier status, but the limited number of reviews weakens the evidence base. The absence of confirmed Finished Product Inspection and formal quality certification data prevents a high-tier quality score. The quality profile appears positive but not yet deeply validated through broad customer feedback or documented inspection systems.

Final Score

14 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 16 / 20
Business Performance 17 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 14 / 20
Total Score 79 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Dongguan Mooxon Technology Co., Ltd. is recommended for conditional cooperation, especially for buyers sourcing outdoor shading, retractable awning, retractable roofing, and outdoor kitchen-related products where platform transaction protection and moderate supplier scale are important.

The supplier is suitable for: - Small-to-medium importers seeking Trade Assurance protection. - Project buyers requiring outdoor shading or roofing-related product solutions. - Buyers testing low or moderate order quantities before scaling. - Customers who value recent transaction activity and strong reported delivery performance.

Key risks: - Limited customer review base, with only 6 reviews despite a 5.0 rating. - Insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and formal quality certifications. - Insufficient data on Full Customization capability. - No provided details on production capacity, machinery, QC process, or export market experience.

Growth potential appears positive based on the supplier’s 90+ orders, CN¥8.1M+ six-month transaction value, 100.0% on-time delivery rate, and verified/audited supplier status. For procurement use, the supplier is best approached with sample orders, pre-shipment inspection requirements, and clear written specifications before larger-volume purchasing.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Dongguan Soeyi Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Soeyi Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meitian Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Meitian Technology Limited Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lushen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lushen Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sanliujiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Sanliujiu Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Masking Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Masking Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Couso Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Couso Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Riotouch Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Riotouch Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yunshi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yunshi Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huayingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Huayingxin Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Topwell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Topwell Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meepss Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Meepss Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Liangyun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Liangyun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Aobote Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Aobote Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huapu Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Huapu Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Liyou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Liyou Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Mozhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Mozhong Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xmx Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xmx Technology (Dongguan) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Memo Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Memo Technology Co.,Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Mihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Mihua Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Mingtra Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Haining Mingtra Textile Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Sichuan Yuexin Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Sichuan Yuexin Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Hamyee Home Decor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hunan Hamyee Home Decor Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mesky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Mesky Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Angel Copy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Angel Copy Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Anping County Xingpeng Hardware Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ablinox (Guangdong) Precision Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ablinox (Guangdong) Precision Metal Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Quanzhou Taihui Shoe Industry Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao New Taosheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao New Taosheng Metal Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiahe Packaging Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Samsung Metal Wire Mesh Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hebei Samsung Metal Wire Mesh Manufacture Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Jinqi Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Hubei Jinqi Industry & Trade Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Topsun Logistic Control Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Topsun Logistic Control Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Yicai Jinyuan Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Yicai Jinyuan Cnc Equipment Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Kunshan Hotest Food Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Foshan Kindle Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jinhua Hongsheng Cultural And Creative Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Emerson Metal Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Tianjin Emerson Metal Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Easy International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Easy International Trading Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao H-Quality Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Qingdao H-Quality Industries Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Hiest Magtech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhuji Hiest Magtech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026