zemez1039

Phones: 800
    • Shopping Cart
    • Checkout
News Top
  • Company Center
  • Featured Companies
  • Newest Companies
  • Recommended Companies

Dongguan Qiandao Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

10.07.26 0 Comments Posted by

Supplier Evaluation Report: Dongguan Qiandao Industrial Co., Ltd.

Dongguan Qiandao Industrial Co., Ltd.

Executive Summary

Dongguan Qiandao Industrial Co., Ltd. is a China-based apparel supplier located in Guangdong, with a reported factory area of 3,000+㎡ and 220+ staff. The company demonstrates a relatively stable manufacturing base for women’s skirt products, including pleated skirts, faux suede skirts, casual skirts, tennis skirts, and high-waist pleated skirts. Its platform profile shows strong credibility, including 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status. Recent business performance is solid, with 600+ orders and CN¥17.5M+ transaction value over the past six months. The supplier is suitable for buyers seeking women’s fashion skirt production with low-to-medium MOQ flexibility and platform-backed transaction security. Key limitations include a moderate store rating of 4.5, only 60+ reviews, response time of ≤3 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection and Full Customization capability.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis

  • Factory location: Guangdong, China
  • Factory area: 3,000+㎡
  • Employees: 220+ staff
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Product scope provided: women’s skirts, including pleated skirts, faux suede skirts, casual skirts, tennis skirts, and high-waist pleated skirts

Elaboration

The supplier has a measurable manufacturing base, with a factory area above 3,000㎡ and more than 220 employees. This indicates a structured production operation rather than a very small workshop. The employee count suggests the company can potentially support multi-style apparel production and recurring order fulfillment. The supplier is also marked as a verified supplier, which adds credibility to its operating profile.

However, the provided data does not include detailed production lines, monthly capacity, machinery list, factory audit reports, or specific factory certifications. Therefore, while the company appears to have a stable mid-sized manufacturing foundation, there is insufficient data to classify it as a large-scale supply chain manufacturer.

Scoring Rationale

The combination of 3,000+㎡ factory area, 220+ staff, and verified supplier status supports a mid-sized stable factory assessment. The supplier is stronger than a small basic manufacturer, but the absence of detailed production capacity, factory certification documentation, or audit depth prevents a top-tier score.

Final Score

16 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis

  • Gold Supplier: True
  • Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
  • Trade Assurance: True
  • Verified supplier: True
  • Certification / industry tags:
  • Socially responsible
  • Low MOQ for customization
  • Warranty available
  • OEM for well-known brands

Elaboration

The supplier has a strong platform history, with 9 years as a Gold Supplier. This indicates long-term platform presence and relatively strong continuity. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with additional transaction protection through ’s platform mechanism. Verified supplier status further strengthens the supplier’s platform credibility.

The listed tags also indicate useful commercial positioning, including social responsibility, low MOQ customization, warranty availability, and OEM capability for well-known brands. However, the data does not provide names of certifications, third-party audit reports, compliance documents, or specific brand references. Therefore, these tags should be treated as platform-level indicators rather than independently verified certification evidence.

Scoring Rationale

A 9-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and verified supplier status form a strong credibility package. The supplier fits the category of a long-term, platform-backed supplier. The score is not full because the provided data does not include detailed compliance certificates, audit documents, or verifiable certification names.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis

  • Orders in the past 6 months: 600+
  • Transaction value in the past 6 months: CN¥17.5M+
  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 60+

Elaboration

The supplier shows strong recent commercial activity. More than 600 orders in six months indicates frequent buyer engagement and active order flow. A transaction value exceeding CN¥17.5M over the same period suggests that the supplier is not only receiving small sample orders but also handling meaningful commercial volume.

The store rating of 4.5 is positive but not exceptional. The review count of 60+ provides some customer feedback reference, though it is not a very large review base relative to the order volume. This means business performance is clearly validated by order and transaction data, but customer feedback depth is moderate.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier deserves a high score due to strong six-month order volume and transaction value. However, the 4.5 rating and 60+ reviews prevent a maximum score, as the customer feedback base is not large enough to fully confirm broad buyer satisfaction at scale.

Final Score

18 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis

  • Communication response time: ≤3h
  • Low MOQ for customization tag: Present
  • Full Customization capability: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier’s reported response time of ≤3 hours is acceptable for international sourcing communication. It indicates that the supplier is reasonably responsive, although it does not reach the strongest service level of ≤1 hour.

The supplier has a platform tag for “Low MOQ for customization,” and several listed products use “Custom” in their product descriptions. This suggests some customization-related service capability. However, the provided data does not explicitly confirm “Full Customization” support, nor does it provide details on design development, sampling support, private labeling, fabric sourcing, pattern-making, or technical package handling. Therefore, customization strength cannot be fully verified.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier demonstrates normal response efficiency and some customization-related positioning, but service capability is not fully proven. Because response time is ≤3 hours rather than ≤1 hour, and Full Customization is not explicitly confirmed, the score should remain in the medium range.

Final Score

7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis

  • On-time delivery rate: 91.7%

Elaboration

The supplier’s on-time delivery rate of 91.7% is above the 90% benchmark. This is a positive indicator for procurement planning, especially for fashion products where seasonality and delivery timing can be important.

However, the data does not include average lead time, production cycle, shipping method, delay reasons, or performance consistency by order size. Therefore, while the on-time shipment rate is strong, the delivery evaluation is based only on one available metric.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring standard, an on-time delivery rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since 91.7% is above the threshold but not extremely high, a score of 9 is appropriate.

Final Score

9 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis

  • Store rating: 4.5
  • Reviews: 60+
  • Verified supplier / Factory Verification: True
  • Finished Product Inspection: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a positive store rating of 4.5 and more than 60 reviews, which provides a basic customer feedback foundation. Verified supplier status also supports a certain level of quality and operational credibility.

However, the provided data does not state whether the supplier has Finished Product Inspection, internal QC procedures, third-party inspection support, defect rate data, return rate data, or quality certifications. The review count is useful but not extensive, and the rating is good rather than outstanding. Therefore, the supplier appears to have acceptable quality credibility, but the quality assurance system is not fully documented in the provided data.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier qualifies for a solid score due to its 4.5 rating, 60+ reviews, and verified supplier status. However, the absence of Finished Product Inspection information and limited quality system details restrict the score from reaching the high-performance range.

Final Score

15 / 20

Total Score

Dimension Score
Company Strength 16 / 20
Platform & Compliance Credibility 19 / 20
Business Performance 18 / 20
Service Capability 7 / 10
Delivery Performance 9 / 10
Quality & Customer Feedback 15 / 20
Total Score 84 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Recommended for cooperation with controlled onboarding.

Dongguan Qiandao Industrial Co., Ltd. is suitable for buyers sourcing women’s skirt products, especially buyers who value platform credibility, Trade Assurance, moderate MOQ levels, and proven recent transaction activity. The supplier appears appropriate for small-to-medium fashion brands, online retailers, boutique apparel sellers, and buyers requiring women’s skirt styles with some customization flexibility.

Key strengths include 9 years as a Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance support, verified supplier status, 600+ orders in the past six months, CN¥17.5M+ recent transaction value, and a 91.7% on-time delivery rate.

Main risks include insufficient data on Finished Product Inspection, unclear Full Customization capability, moderate review volume, and a store rating of 4.5 that should be monitored. Before placing large-volume orders, buyers should request product samples, confirm QC procedures, clarify customization scope, and define inspection standards in writing.

Overall, the supplier shows strong platform credibility and solid commercial performance, with growth potential if it can provide more transparent quality control documentation and stronger customization service details.

  • Comments

Comments

Leave your comment
Cancel reply

Note: HTML is not translated!

Submit comment

Most popular Blog

Qiandao Industrial (Hongkong) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Qiandao Industrial (Hongkong) Co., Limited Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qiandao Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Qiandao Apparel Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yongshengyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Yongshengyuan Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Great Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Great Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lanxin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Lanxin Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiechuang Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Jiechuang Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Maidou Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Maidou Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cycle Tree Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Cycle Tree Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Booming Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Booming Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan New-Sail Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan New-Sail Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enhua Industrial Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Enhua Industrial Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Cnmi Industrial Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Cnmi Industrial Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Diwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Diwei Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Opled Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Clientop Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Clientop Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ganzhou Suifeng Industrial Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Ganzhou Suifeng Industrial Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Kimtex Industrial Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Zhenjiang Kimtex Industrial Inc. Supplier Evaluation
Victors Industrial (H.K.) Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Victors Industrial (H.K.) Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jinkung Industrial (Shandong) Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Jinkung Industrial (Shandong) Corporation Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Waterpro Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Waterpro Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Blog You May Like

Zhongshan Xieyuan Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhongshan Xieyuan Gifts Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiuzhou Automobile Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shandong Jiuzhou Automobile Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Infinitas Food Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Infinitas Food Technology Company Limited Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jiangxi Qingyunzhi Clothing Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shanghai Forests Packaging Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Xuzhou Datianxia Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sunhi-Mach Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Sunhi-Mach Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Yitong Filter Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shijiazhuang Yitong Filter Machinery Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinrong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Dongguan Xinrong Hardware Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feilong Home Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Feilong Home Electrical Group Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yongkang Mry Industry&Trade Co. Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Zhejiang Yongkang Mry Industry&Trade Co. Ltd Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Minglian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Minglian Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Luxun Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Xingwang Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Chaozhou Xingwang Stainless Steel Products Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Astouch Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Astouch Tech Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Newlight Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Newlight Industrial Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongcai Thermal Transfer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Guangzhou Hongcai Thermal Transfer New Material Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
General Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
General Electronics Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wins Novelty Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Shenzhen Wins Novelty Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jizhi Health Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation
Jizhi Health Technology (Guangzhou) Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Information

  • About Us

Store Info

Address:
4578 Marmora Road, Glasgow, D04 89GR
Phones:
800
We are open:

E-mail: kimibetters@gmail.com

Sign Up for Our Newsletter

Get all the latest information on Events, Sales and Offers. Sign up for newsletter today.

Powered By News Top © 2026