Dongguan Zhuohaoyang Paper & Plastic Products Co., Ltd Supplier Evaluation

Executive Summary

Dongguan Zhuohaoyang Paper & Plastic Products Co., LTD is a Guangdong, China-based supplier with a reported factory area of 13,000+㎡ and 330+ staff, indicating a relatively solid manufacturing base for paper and plastic product-related categories. The provided product data focuses on binders, trading card storage products, comic book frames, and coin binders, with MOQs ranging from 100 to 500 pieces. The supplier shows strong platform credibility, supported by 12 years as an Gold Supplier, Trade Assurance availability, verified supplier status, and labels including Finished Product Inspection, Warranty Available, Socially Responsible, and OEM for well-known brands. Business performance is moderate to strong, with 100+ orders and CN¥1.1M+ transaction value over the past six months, alongside a 4.8 store rating and 20+ reviews. Delivery performance is strong at 95.6% on-time shipment. This supplier appears suitable for buyers seeking established China-based sourcing partners for collectible storage and binder-related products, especially those valuing platform-backed transaction security.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength

Basis:
- Factory location: Guangdong, China
- Factory area: 13,000+㎡
- Employees: 330+ staff
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration:
The supplier demonstrates a meaningful physical production footprint with over 13,000㎡ of factory space and more than 330 employees. This scale suggests a structured manufacturing operation rather than a very small workshop. The verified supplier status further supports the credibility of its stated operational presence. However, the provided data does not include production lines, annual capacity, machinery details, or specific factory certification documents.

Scoring Rationale:
The combination of factory size, employee count, and verified supplier status supports a strong company strength score. While the supplier appears to have stable manufacturing capacity, the absence of detailed production capacity data prevents assigning a perfect score.

Final Score: 18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility

Basis:
- Gold Supplier: True
- Gold Supplier duration: 12 years
- Trade Assurance: True
- Certification / industry labels: Socially responsible, Warranty available, OEM for well-known brands, Finished product inspection

Elaboration:
The supplier has a long-standing presence, with 12 years as a Gold Supplier. Trade Assurance availability provides additional transaction protection for buyers. The listed platform labels indicate multiple credibility signals, including quality-related and service-related tags. However, the data does not provide independent third-party certification names or detailed audit reports beyond the platform-provided labels.

Scoring Rationale:
A 12-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance support, and multiple credibility labels create a strong platform trust profile. The score is high because the core credibility indicators are complete and mature, though not perfect due to limited detail on external compliance certifications.

Final Score: 19 / 20

3. Business Performance

Basis:
- Orders in past 6 months: 100+
- Transaction value in past 6 months: CN¥1.1M+
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 20+

Elaboration:
The supplier has generated over 100 orders and more than CN¥1.1M in transaction value within six months, indicating active commercial performance on the platform. The 4.8 store rating is strong, suggesting generally positive buyer satisfaction. However, the review count of 20+ is relatively limited compared with very high-volume suppliers, so the depth of public customer feedback is moderate rather than extensive.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier shows stable recent transaction activity and a high store rating. The order and transaction figures support commercial validation, but the relatively modest review count limits the score from reaching the highest band.

Final Score: 17 / 20

4. Service Capability

Basis:
- Communication response time: ≤5h
- Full Customization support: Insufficient Data

Elaboration:
The supplier’s reported response time of five hours or less indicates acceptable communication efficiency for international sourcing inquiries. However, the provided data does not state whether Full Customization is supported. Since customization capability is a key scoring factor, this missing information limits the assessment.

Scoring Rationale:
The response time is reasonable but not within the strongest ≤1 hour benchmark. Because Full Customization capability is not provided, the supplier should be assessed as having normal service responsiveness but incomplete evidence of advanced service capability.

Final Score: 7 / 10

5. Delivery Performance

Basis:
- On-time shipment rate: 95.6%

Elaboration:
A 95.6% on-time shipment rate is a strong delivery indicator. It suggests the supplier generally manages order fulfillment and shipment scheduling effectively. No additional data is provided on average lead time, delay handling, logistics methods, or seasonal capacity fluctuation.

Scoring Rationale:
The on-time shipment rate exceeds 90%, placing the supplier in the highest delivery performance band. The score is strong, though not automatically perfect because only one delivery metric is available.

Final Score: 10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback

Basis:
- Store rating: 4.8
- Reviews: 20+
- Finished Product Inspection: Listed
- Verified supplier / factory audit status: True

Elaboration:
The supplier has a high store rating of 4.8, which indicates positive customer feedback. The Finished Product Inspection label provides a quality-control signal, and verified supplier status adds further credibility. However, the review base is only 20+, which is not large enough to fully validate long-term quality consistency across many buyers or large order volumes.

Scoring Rationale:
The supplier has good quality-related indicators, including a high rating, finished product inspection, and verified status. The main limitation is the relatively small number of reviews, which reduces confidence compared with suppliers with broader customer feedback volume.

Final Score: 17 / 20

Total Score

88 / 100

Procurement Recommendation

Cooperation is recommended, especially for buyers sourcing trading card binders, comic book frames, coin binders, and related collectible storage products with moderate MOQs. The supplier is most suitable for small to medium-sized importers, e-commerce sellers, promotional product buyers, and brands that value platform credibility, Trade Assurance, and stable delivery performance.

Key risks include limited public review volume, insufficient data on Full Customization capability, and lack of detailed production capacity or third-party certification documentation. Growth potential appears positive based on its 12-year Gold Supplier history, verified supplier status, 330+ staff scale, CN¥1.1M+ recent transaction value, and 95.6% on-time shipment rate. For larger or highly customized procurement programs, buyers should request factory audit documents, product inspection procedures, customization confirmation, samples, and production lead-time details before placing bulk orders.