Zhejiang Benyuan Plastic Paper Technology Co., Ltd. Supplier Evaluation

Supplier Evaluation Report

Supplier: Zhejiang Benyuan Plastic Paper Technology Co., Ltd.
Country/Province: China, Zhejiang

Executive Summary

Zhejiang Benyuan Plastic Paper Technology Co., Ltd. presents itself as a relatively large-scale manufacturing supplier, supported by a reported factory area of over 37,000㎡ and more than 530 staff. The supplier is listed as an audited supplier and has 9 years of Gold Supplier status, Trade Assurance support, and platform labels including Finished Product Inspection, Full Customization, ODM service available, and Minor Customization. These factors indicate a solid operational and platform credibility foundation.

However, its recent commercial performance data is limited, with only 5 orders and CN¥40.5K+ transaction value in the past six months. Store rating is not provided, and the review count is 0, which weakens customer feedback validation. The supplier may be suitable for buyers seeking plastic paper, transparent film, CPP, PP film roll, or self-adhesive film-related products with customization requirements, but initial cooperation should be controlled through sample checks, Trade Assurance, and clear quality inspection requirements.

Detailed Analysis

1. Company Strength — 20 Points

Basis

• Factory area: 37,000+㎡
• Employees: 530+ staff
• Audited supplier: True
• Location: Zhejiang, China

Elaboration

The supplier demonstrates a strong physical manufacturing base based on the reported factory size and workforce. A factory area exceeding 37,000㎡ and a staff size above 530 indicate that the company is not a small trading operation based on the available data. The audited supplier status further strengthens the basic reliability of the company profile, although the exact audit scope and audit organization are not provided in the dataset.

Scoring Rationale

The factory scale and staff count support classification as a large-scale supplier with stable production capacity. The audited supplier indication adds credibility to its operational foundation. However, because the dataset does not provide detailed production lines, annual output, machine quantity, capacity utilization, or specific factory audit documents, the score is not placed at the absolute maximum.

Final Score

18 / 20

2. Platform & Compliance Credibility — 20 Points

Basis

• Gold Supplier: True
• Gold Supplier duration: 9 years
• Trade Assurance: True
• Certification / industry tags:
• Finished Product Inspection
• Full Customization
• ODM service available
• Minor Customization

Elaboration

The supplier has a relatively long Gold Supplier history of 9 years, which is a positive signal for platform continuity. Trade Assurance support provides buyers with an additional transactional protection mechanism on the platform. The presence of labels such as Finished Product Inspection and customization-related capabilities further improves the supplier’s platform profile.

Scoring Rationale

A 9-year Gold Supplier record, Trade Assurance availability, and multiple platform tags indicate a strong platform credibility structure. The supplier also has an audited supplier status in the basic information, which supports verification credibility. However, the data does not provide detailed certificates, compliance documents, ISO certifications, third-party audit reports, or specific factory verification documentation beyond the available platform indicators. Therefore, the score is high but not perfect.

Final Score

19 / 20

3. Business Performance — 20 Points

Basis

• Orders in past 6 months: 5
• Transaction amount in past 6 months: CN¥40.5K+
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0

Elaboration

The supplier’s recent transaction data shows limited commercial activity on the platform. Five orders over six months and CN¥40.5K+ in transaction value indicate that some transactions have occurred, but the scale is relatively low compared with suppliers showing high order volumes and substantial transaction records. The lack of store rating and absence of reviews reduce the visibility of buyer satisfaction and repeat performance.

Scoring Rationale

Although the company has completed recent transactions, the order volume and transaction amount are not strong enough to demonstrate high commercial momentum. More importantly, the absence of store rating data and 0 reviews prevent a complete assessment of customer satisfaction. This creates a gap between operational scale and marketplace-verified business performance.

Final Score

10 / 20

4. Service Capability — 10 Points

Basis

• Response time: ≤6h
• Full Customization: Available
• ODM service: Available
• Minor Customization: Available

Elaboration

The supplier provides several customization-related services, including full customization, ODM service, and minor customization. This suggests flexibility for buyers requiring product adaptation. The response time of ≤6 hours is acceptable for normal business communication, although it is not within the fastest response bracket of ≤1 hour.

Scoring Rationale

The supplier shows strong customization capability based on the platform labels. However, the communication response time is not at the top-tier level defined by the scoring framework. Since there is no additional information on sample development speed, quotation efficiency, language capability, or dedicated account management, the service score remains in the upper-middle range.

Final Score

8 / 10

5. Delivery Performance — 10 Points

Basis

• On-time dispatch rate: 100.0%

Elaboration

The supplier reports a 100.0% on-time dispatch rate, which is the strongest available indicator under this dimension. This suggests that, based on the provided data, the supplier has met dispatch timing requirements for recorded platform orders.

Scoring Rationale

According to the scoring framework, an on-time dispatch rate above 90% qualifies for 9–10 points. Since the supplier’s reported rate is 100.0%, it earns the maximum score for this dimension. However, this should still be interpreted together with the relatively small recent order volume of 5 orders, as the delivery performance sample size is limited.

Final Score

10 / 10

6. Quality & Customer Feedback — 20 Points

Basis

• Finished Product Inspection: Available
• Audited supplier: True
• Store rating: Insufficient Data
• Review count: 0
• Factory Verification: Insufficient Data

Elaboration

The supplier has a Finished Product Inspection label, which is a positive quality-control indicator. The audited supplier status also supports basic credibility. However, customer-facing quality feedback is weak because the store rating is not provided and there are no reviews. The dataset does not confirm Factory Verification separately, so this must be treated as Insufficient Data.

Scoring Rationale

The presence of Finished Product Inspection provides some assurance that quality checks are available before shipment. Nevertheless, the lack of customer reviews and missing store rating significantly limit the ability to validate quality consistency through buyer feedback. Because quality assurance exists but customer feedback evidence is insufficient, the score remains in the lower-middle range rather than the high range.

Final Score

12 / 20

Total Score

Procurement Recommendation

Recommendation: Conditionally Recommended

Zhejiang Benyuan Plastic Paper Technology Co., Ltd. appears suitable for buyers seeking a supplier with relatively strong factory scale, long platform presence, Trade Assurance support, and customization capability. Its 37,000+㎡ factory area, 530+ staff, audited supplier status, 9-year Gold Supplier history, and 100.0% on-time dispatch rate are positive procurement indicators.

Suitable customer types:
- Buyers requiring plastic film, transparent film, CPP/PP film, or self-adhesive film-related products based on the listed product data
- Buyers needing customization, ODM, or minor customization support
- Importers or distributors willing to validate quality through samples and controlled trial orders

Main risks:
- Low recent platform transaction volume: only 5 orders in the past 6 months
- Limited transaction amount: CN¥40.5K+
- Store rating: Insufficient Data
- Review count: 0, limiting customer feedback validation
- Factory Verification details: Insufficient Data

Growth potential:
The supplier has a strong manufacturing and platform foundation, but its market validation on the provided platform data is limited. It may be a promising supplier for structured trial cooperation, provided that buyers use Trade Assurance, request samples, confirm product specifications in writing, and require finished product inspection before shipment.